不同土石比的工程堆积体边坡径流侵蚀过程

    Runoff erosion process on slope of engineering accumulation with different soil-rock ratio

    • 摘要: 工程堆积体可在短时期内极大程度地改变原地貌地形、土壤和植被条件,使其在降雨径流作用下将发生严重土壤侵蚀,因此是生产建设项目区水土流失最为严重的地貌单元。该文采用土工试验方法及野外实地放水冲刷法研究不同物质来源和土石比的工程堆积体边坡物理性质、侵蚀动力及径流侵蚀过程。结果表明:1)2种松散工程堆积体的物质组成和入渗性能均较原土差异明显,其中黄沙壤工程堆积体以≤0.25mm颗粒为主,其颗粒变异系数为原土的1.2~2.0倍,稳定入渗率为原土1.70~4.07倍;而紫色土堆积体级配良好,颗粒变异系数是其原土的2.2倍,稳定入渗率为原土的7.02~11.59倍。2)各种工程堆积体边坡侵蚀动力学参数随放水流量变大而增加,黄沙壤工程堆积体边坡径流流速在0.155~0.318 m/s之间变化,径流剪切力变化在27.632~57.154 N/m2,土壤剥蚀率在0.337~77.071 g/(m2·s)之间;而紫色土工程堆积体边坡径流流速、剪切力和土壤剥蚀率分别在0.184~0.281 m/s,35.525~53.600 N/m2和1.445~61.910 g/(m2·s)。3)土石混合质边坡在产流9 min内存在不同程度突变或波动,在相同条件下边坡累积产流量均表现为偏土质>土石混合质,黄沙壤工程堆积体边坡累积产流量高于紫色土;而土石混合质边坡的产沙率呈连续性多峰多谷变化,边坡侵蚀沟壁土体崩塌脱落是造成产沙率波动的重要原因。该研究可为生产建设项目工程堆积体水土流失量预测和水土保持植物措施选择提供基本参数和技术支持。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: Engineering accumulation, a kind of loose soil-sock mixture consisted of soil, parent rock and stone caused by various artificial engineering during producing and constructing process, is the most serious erosion-landform in production and construction areas because it can greatly change the terrain, soil and vegetation conditions of original landform in a very short term, thereby causing great soil and water loss under a certain rainfall-runoff condition, and making more difficult for ecological restoration in these project areas. In order to revel the runoff erosion mechanism and its process for engineering accumulations with different slopes and soil-rock ratios, we carried out field scouring experiments from August to November 2012 at the Soil Erosion Experiment Site for production and construction projects in Southwestern University, Chongqing (29° 48' 50.2" N, 106° 24' 48.8 "E). The field scouring experiments were conducted under the simulated runoff conditions according to the regional rainstorm occurrence frequency with the 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 L/min for purple soil deposits and 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15 L/min for yellow sand deposits, respectively. In the experiment, some physical properties, hydraulic properties and runoff erosion process on underlying surfaces of engineering accumulations with different producing sources and soil-rock ratios were all comparatively studied. The results indicated that material composition and infiltration capacity of the two loose engineering accumulations were remarkably different from original landform. The yellow sand deposit was dominated by ≤0.25 mm particles with particles variation coefficient as high as 1.2-2.0 times than its original landform and its stable infiltration rate was 1.70-4.07 times than original landforms, respectively; while purple soil deposit was well-distributed, its' variation coefficient of particles was 2.2 times than original landform and the stable infiltration rate was 7.02-11.59 times than original landforms. The experiments also showed that soil-rock ratio change could influence the slope infiltration performance for the two engineering accumulations and the effects of engineering construction on the purple soil deposits were more powerful than that of the yellow sand deposits. Some dynamic parameters on underlying surfaces of engineering accumulations increased with increasing flow discharge, in which flow velocity of yellow sand deposits ranged from 0.155 to 0.318 m/s, flow shear stress varied between 27.632 and 57.154 N/m2, and soil detachment rate changed from 0.337 to 77.071 g/(m2·s); while the flow velocity, flow shear stress and soil detachment rate of purple soil deposits were 0.184-0.281 m/s,35.525-53.600 N/m2 and 1.445-61.910 g/(m2·s), respectively. For rocky underlying surfaces, runoff yield rate had continuously waving variations within 9 min after runoff yielded. When flow discharge increased gradually from 5 to 25 L/min, the average runoff yield rate of rock underlying surface from yellow sand deposit increased by 510.38%, 531.96 % and that of purple soil deposit increased by 73.20% and 57.61%, respectively; for same conditions, the cumulative runoff of underlying surfaces showed the similar trend of partial soil deposits larger than rocky deposits, and that of yellow sand deposit higher than purple soil deposit. For rocky underlying surfaces, sediment yield rate presented continuously multi-peak multi-valleys. When flow discharge increased from 5 to 25 L/min gradually, the average sediment production rate of rock underlying surface from yellow sand deposit were 0.001, 0.03, 0.542 kg/(m2·min), respectively, while that of purple soil deposit were 0.0003, 0.012, 0.034 kg/(m2·min), respectively. The collapse on gully wall caused by gravity from underlying surfaces was an important cause for the fluctuating variations of the sediment yield rate. These results provide essential parameters and technical supports for predicting soil water loss caused by production and construction projects and for selecting vegetation measures for soil and water conservation in similar areas.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回