徐立友, 吴依伟, 周志立. 基于人体测量学的拖拉机驾驶员工作空间设计[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(11): 124-129. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.11.018
    引用本文: 徐立友, 吴依伟, 周志立. 基于人体测量学的拖拉机驾驶员工作空间设计[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(11): 124-129. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.11.018
    Xu Liyou, Wu Yiwei, Zhou Zhili. Design of workplace for tractor operator based on anthropometry[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(11): 124-129. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.11.018
    Citation: Xu Liyou, Wu Yiwei, Zhou Zhili. Design of workplace for tractor operator based on anthropometry[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(11): 124-129. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.11.018

    基于人体测量学的拖拉机驾驶员工作空间设计

    Design of workplace for tractor operator based on anthropometry

    • 摘要: 针对中国拖拉机驾驶员工作空间设计在操纵性、舒适性、方便性和安全性等方面存在的不足,该文从人机工程学角度出发,基于中国成年男性人体测量尺寸,计算出设计所需的28项人体主要尺寸的平均值、标准差和百分位数值,建立了拖拉机驾驶员人体关节生物力学模型,确定了模型中连接与人体测量尺寸的数值关系。以乘坐基准点为参考,对驾驶员工作空间内的座椅、踏板、转向盘、变速杆、液压操纵杆和仪表盘等进行了设计布置。选取了5个国产拖拉机样机T1、T2、T3、T4、T5,针对样机T1,以驾驶员工作空间各相应部件位置的设计理论值为依据,对其驾驶员工作空间布置进行了评价分析,结果表明:样机T1的座椅靠背宽度与夹角分别偏离理论值130 mm和15°;离合器踏板及制动踏板在水平方向上分别偏离理论值131和145 mm;转向盘在垂直方向上偏离理论值114 mm;仪表盘在水平、垂直方向及其与水平面夹角分别偏离理论值121 mm、199 mm和23.2°,与理论值偏差较大。同理,对其他样机进行了评价分析,结果表明:样机之间同类部件参数值差异较大,样机驾驶员工作空间尺寸与通过人体测量尺寸数据计算得出的设计理论值差异明显,样机驾驶员工作空间设计布置不合理。该文为评价驾驶室工作空间布置是否合理提供了一定的参考依据,同时为拖拉机驾驶员工作空间的优化设计奠定了理论基础。

       

      Abstract: To deal with the problems of handling, comfort, convenience and safety for tractor operators in contemporary Chinese tractor operator workpace design, this paper describes the design principles of tractor operator workpace based on anthropometry. Referring to anthropometric data in "Human dimensions of Chinese adults" (GB/T 10000-1988), the 28 body dimensions of Chinese adult males needed in tractor operator workpace design and the values of the mean and standard deviation, and the 5th and 95th percentile values for each body dimension were presented. The simplied biomechanical model of seated tractor operator was built considering the Chinese operator's driving habits, and the model consisted of the straight links which stood for bones and the joints which stood for major articulations. The numerical relationship between standard anthropometric dimensions and link lengths was established, and the comfortable range of angles and the values used in design were determined. The design and layout scheme of seat and controls in operator workspace was developed with the seating reference point, and therefore the expressions of locating seat and controls were deduced. Then the design theoretical values of components' locations were computed. The location of the instrument panel should have an inclination angle not more than 45° and a distance of less than 700 mm from the ellipse center of operator' eyes considering the 95th percentile value in seated posture of operator. In order to accommodate tractor operator stature from 5th to 95th percentile, the provision of 112 mm horizontal and 78 mm vertical adjustment in seat is desirable. Five Chinese tractors, named T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5, were selected as the models, and T1 was chosen to be compared in respect of existing workpace dimensions on the basis of design theoretical values of components. It was found that for the T1, its backrest width and angle deviate from the theoretical values were 130 mm and 15° respectively; the clutch pedal and brake pedal deviate from the theoretical values were 131 and 145 mm in horizontal direction respectively; the steering wheel deviate from the theoretical values was 114 mm in vertical direction; the instrument panel deviate from the theoretical values was 121 mm, 199 mm and 23.2° in horizontal and vertical directions and angle respectively. These values for the T1 had a big deviation compared with the design theoretical ones, and the design of the T1 could not guarantee the operator's sitting comfort, affecting its manipulation of the steering wheel and pedals and normal reading of the instrument panel information, so the workpace design of T1 is not reasonable. The other models were analyzed with the same theory for T1. The result showed that the parameter values for the same components of the models were clearly different, and they also were widely different from the designed theoretical values calculated through anthropometric data. Meanwhile, steering column angles, hydraulic control lever locations, angle between instrument panel plane and horizontal plane, seat pan inclination and seat back angle parameters were quite different among tractor models. Thus, the design of models is unreasonable and it is necessary to be optimized on the basis of Chinese anthropometric data of the tractor operator's population. The paper provides a frame of reference for evaluating the rationality of the design in tractor operator workpace, and a theoretical basis for the optimization design in tractor operator workpace as well.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回