• EI
    • CSA
    • CABI
    • 卓越期刊
    • CA
    • Scopus
    • CSCD
    • 核心期刊

高速气流条件下标准扇形喷头和空气诱导喷头雾化特性

唐青, 陈立平, 张瑞瑞, 张斌, 伊铜川, 徐旻, 徐刚

唐青, 陈立平, 张瑞瑞, 张斌, 伊铜川, 徐旻, 徐刚. 高速气流条件下标准扇形喷头和空气诱导喷头雾化特性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(22): 121-128. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.22.017
引用本文: 唐青, 陈立平, 张瑞瑞, 张斌, 伊铜川, 徐旻, 徐刚. 高速气流条件下标准扇形喷头和空气诱导喷头雾化特性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(22): 121-128. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.22.017
Tang Qing, Chen Liping, Zhang Ruirui, Zhang Bin, Yi Tongchuan, Xu Min, Xu Gang. Atomization characteristics of normal flat fan nozzle and air induction nozzle under high speed airflow conditions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(22): 121-128. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.22.017
Citation: Tang Qing, Chen Liping, Zhang Ruirui, Zhang Bin, Yi Tongchuan, Xu Min, Xu Gang. Atomization characteristics of normal flat fan nozzle and air induction nozzle under high speed airflow conditions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(22): 121-128. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.22.017

高速气流条件下标准扇形喷头和空气诱导喷头雾化特性

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(31601228);国家重点研发计划-地面与航空高工效施药技术及智能化装备(2016YFD0200700);北京市自然科学基金项目(6164032)

Atomization characteristics of normal flat fan nozzle and air induction nozzle under high speed airflow conditions

  • 摘要: 标准扇形喷头与空气诱导喷头均为地面喷雾常用喷头,其在低速条件下的雾化特性已有较多研究,而在高速气流下的雾化特性尚不清楚。为了探究对比2种喷头在高速气流条件下的雾化特性,以及其用作航空喷头的可能性,基于北京农业智能装备技术研究中心自行设计制造的IEA-I型高速风洞,采用马尔文Spraytec喷雾粒度仪对德国Lechler公司生产的LU-120-03标准扇形压力喷头和IDK-120-03空气诱导喷头进行了测试。试验结果表明,两种类型喷头在距离出口0.15 m时,雾滴并未完全雾化。而在距离出口0.35 m时雾滴均已充分雾化。其中LU-120-03扇形压力喷头雾滴体积中径随风速增大从210 μm逐渐减小至130 μm,在管道压力达0.4 MPa以上时,其雾滴粒径分布跨度随风速增大逐渐从1.3增至1.5。而IDK-120-03空气诱导喷头产生的雾滴粒径相对较大,在风速为120 km/h时,达420~450 μm,但其随着风速进一步增加快速减小,在风速达305 km/h时,其产生的雾滴体积中径降低到150 μm。试验还发现管道压力变化对LU-120-03扇形压力喷头产生雾滴体积中径影响较大,而对IDK-120-03空气诱导喷头产生的雾滴体积中径影响较小。该研究可为固定翼有人机航空施药方案,如喷头选型、压力选择、作业速度选择等提供试验数据指导。
    Abstract: Abstract: Flat fan nozzles and air induction nozzles are often used in ground spraying. Although the atomization characteristics of these 2 kinds of nozzles in low speed flow were studied sufficiently, their high speed atomization characteristics were still not very clear. The objectives of this research were to assess the atomization characteristics of the LU-120-03 normal flat fan nozzle and the IDK-120-03 air induction nozzle, and their suitability in agricultural aerial spray application. The experiment was conducted in the IEA-I high speed wind tunnel at National Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Equipment for Agriculture (NERCIEA) with Marvern Spraytec laser diffraction system. The measurement point was set at 0.15, 0.25 and 0.35 m away from the orifice of the nozzle which was 0.1 m outside the exit of the tunnel. The wind speed range was from 121.7 to 305.5 km/h, and the tube pressure was set to be 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 MPa. The nozzle was installed on an electric lifting platform which could be traversed vertically so that the entire spray plume could be sampled by the laser diffraction system. Three replications for each nozzle/pressure tested were taken, and the standard deviation of volume middle diameter of droplets was required to be less than or equal to 5% of the mean. The results of the experiment to the LU-120-03 nozzle showed that when the wind speed increased from 150 to 305 km/h, the volume middle diameter of the droplets decreased from 210 to 130 μm. The relative span of the droplets was found to slightly increase from 1.3 to 1.5 with the increase of the wind speed when the tube pressure exceeded 0.4 MPa. The volume middle diameter of the droplets was also found to be related to the tube pressure. When the wind speed was less than 250 km/h, the increase of the tube pressure could decrease the volume middle diameter of the droplets. However, it would increase the volume middle diameter slightly when the wind speed exceeded 280 km/h. The main reasons of the droplet atomization were also discussed, and the aerodynamic shear stress was believed to be one of the most important reasons. Droplets generated by the IDK-120-03 nozzle had a different behavior. The volume middle diameter of the droplets decreased rapidly (by about 70%) when the wind speed increased from 120 to 305 km/h. Meanwhile, it was not affected by the tube pressure. The relative span of the droplets was mainly affected by the wind speed. When the wind speed was less than 220 km/h, the relative span of the droplets was in proportion to the wind speed. When the wind speed exceeded 220 km/h, the relative span of the droplets decreased slightly with the increase of the wind speed. The increase of the tube pressure could also increase the relative span of the droplets slightly. The measuring distance from the orifice of the nozzle was also found to be important to the diameter and relative span of the droplets. In our results, 0.35 m away from the orifice of the nozzle was a proper measuring point, at which the droplets were fully atomized.
  • [1] EPA. Pesticide registration notice 2001-x draft: Spray and dust drift label statements for pesticide products[EB/OL]. Washington.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. www.epa.gov/PR_Notices/prdraft-spraydrift801.htm.
    [2] 袁会珠,郑加强,何雄奎,等. 农药使用技术指南[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,2004.
    [3] Taylor W A, Womac A R, Miller P C H, et al. An attempt to relate drop size to drift risk[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Pesticide Application for Drift Management, 2004, 210-223.
    [4] Nuyttens D, Baetens K, Schampheleire M D, et al. Effect of nozzle type, size, and pressure on spray droplet characteristics[J]. Biosystems Eng, 2007, 97(3): 333-345.
    [5] Bouse L F. Effect of nozzle type and operation on spray droplet size[J]. Trans. ASAE, 1994, 37(5): 1389-1400.
    [6] Czaczyk Z. Influence of air flow dynamics on droplet size in conditions of air-assisted sprayers[J]. Atomization and Sprays, 2012, 22(4): 275-282.
    [7] Nuyttens D, Taylor W A, Schampheleire M D, et al. Influence of nozzle type and size on drift potential by means of different wind tunnel evaluation methods[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2009, 103(3): 271-280.
    [8] Teske M E, Thistle H W, Hewitt A J, et al. Rotary atomizer drop size distribution database[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2005, 48(3): 917-921.
    [9] Kirk I W. Measurement and prediction of atomization parameters from fixed-wing aircraft spray nozzles[J]. Trans. ASABE, 2007, 50(3): 693-703.
    [10] Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Bagley W E. Effects of spray aerial application on conditions and implication on drift[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2010, 26(1): 21-29.
    [11] Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C. Update to the USDA-ARS fixed-wing spray nozzle models[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2015, 58(2): 281-295.
    [12] Martin D E, Carlton J B. Airspeed and orifice size affect spray droplet spectrum from an aerial electrostatic nozzle for fixed-wing applications[J]. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2013, 29(1): 5-10.
    [13] Teske M E, Thistle H W, Hewitt A J, et al. Rotary atomizer drop size distribution database[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2005, 48(3): 917-921.
    [14] Hewitt A J. Droplet size spectra classification categories in aerial application scenarios[J]. Crop Protection, 2008, 27(9): 1284-1288.
    [15] 刘雪美,苑进,张晓辉,等. 气流辅助式喷雾工况参数对雾滴飘移特性的影响[J]. 农业机械学报,2012,43(增刊):67-72.Liu Xuemei, Yuan Jin, Zhang Xiaohui, et al. Effect of air-assisted spraying condition parameters on boom spray drift characteristics[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2012, 43(Supp.): 67-72. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [16] 张慧春,Gary D,郑加强,等. 扇形喷头雾滴粒径分布风洞试验[J]. 农业机械学报,2012,43(6):52-57.Zhang Huichun, Gary D, Zheng Jiaqiang, et al. Wind tunnel experiment of influence on droplet size distribution of flat fan nozzles[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2012, 43(6): 52-57. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [17] 张京,宋坚利,何雄奎,等. 扇形雾喷头雾化过程中雾滴运动特性[J]. 农业机械学报,2011,42(4):66-69.Zhang Jing, Song Jianli, He Xiongkui, et al. Droplets movement characteristics in atomization process of flat nozzle[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2011, 42(4) : 66-69. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [18] 张慧春,郑加强,周宏平,等. 转笼式生物农药雾化喷头的性能试验[J]. 农业工程学报,2013,29(4):63-70.Zhang Huichun, Zheng Jiaqiang, Zhou Hongping, et al. Performance experiments of rotary cage atomizer for biological pesticide application[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2013, 29(4): 63-70. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [19] 茹煜,金兰,周宏平,等. 航空施药旋转液力雾化喷头性能试验[J]. 农业工程学报,2014,30(3):50-55.Ru Yu, Jin Lan, Zhou Hongping, et al. Performance experiment of rotary hydraulic atomizing nozzle for aerial spraying application[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2014, 30(3): 50-55. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [20] 曾爱军,何雄奎,陈青云,等. 典型液力喷头在风洞环境中的飘移特性试验与评价[J]. 农业工程学报,2005,21(10):78-81.Zeng Aijun, He Xiongkui, Chen Qingyun, et al. Spray drift potential evaluation of typical nozzles under wind tunnel conditions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2005, 21(10): 78-81. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [21] Ellis M C B, Swan T, Miller P C H, et al. Design factors affecting spray characteristics and drift performance of air induction nozzles[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2002, 82(3):289-296.
    [22] Ferguson J C, O'Donnell C C, Chauhan B S, et al. Determining the uniformity and consistency of droplet size across spray drift reducing nozzles in a wind tunnel[J]. Crop Protection, 2015, 76: 1-6.
    [23] 吕晓兰,傅锡敏,吴萍,等. 喷雾技术参数对雾滴沉积分布影响试验[J]. 农业机械学报,2011,42(6):70-75.Lü Xiaolan, Fu Ximin, Wu Ping, et al. Influence of spray operating parameters on spray deposition[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2011, 42(6): 70-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [24] ASAE Standards. 2004. S572: Spray nozzle classification by droplet spectra[S]. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.
    [25] 唐青,陈立平,张瑞瑞,等. IEA-Ⅰ型航空植保高速风洞的设计与校测[J]. 农业工程学报,2016,32(6):73-81.Tang Qing, Chen Liping, Zhang Ruirui, et al. Design and test of IEA-I high speed wind tunnel for aerial plant protection[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(6): 73-81. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [26] 朱传银,王秉玺. 航空喷雾植保技术的发展与探讨[J]. 植物保护,2014(5):1-7.Zhu Chuanyin, Wang Bingxi. Development and discussion of aerial spray technology in plant protection[J]. Plant Protection, 2014(5): 1-7. ( in Chinese with English abstract)
    [27] 曹建明. 液体喷雾学[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2013.
    [28] Dodge L G, Rhodes D J, Reitz R D. Drop-size measurement techniques for sprays: comparison of malvern laser-diffraction and aerometrics phase/doppler[J]. Applied Optics, 1987, 26(11): 2144-2154.
    [29] Hoffmann W C, Fritz B K, Bagley W E, et al. Effects of air speed and liquid temperature on droplet size[J]. Journal of Astm International, 2011, 8(4): 1-9.
    [30] Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Bagley W E, et al. Measuring droplet size of agricultural spray nozzles-measurement distance and air speed effects[J]. Atomization & Sprays, 2014, 24(9): 747-760.
    [31] 谢晨,何雄奎,宋坚利,等. 两类扇形雾喷头雾化过程比较研究[J]. 农业工程学报,2013,29(5):25-30.Xie Chen, He Xiongkui, Song Jianli, et al. Comparative research of two kinds of flat fan nozzle atomization process[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE), 2013, 29(5): 25-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1940
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  794
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-10-20
  • 修回日期:  2016-09-20
  • 发布日期:  2016-11-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回