牛粪添加量对油菜秆半固态发酵产甲烷特性的影响

马旭光; 江滔; 唐琼; 杨娟

doi:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.z2.046

牛粪添加量对油菜秆半固态发酵产甲烷特性的影响

乐山师范学院化学学院，乐山 614004

基金项目: 国家自然基金项目（51508258）；四川省教育厅重点项目（15ZA0276）；乐山师范学院人才引进项目（Z1410）

计量
- 文章访问数: 1350
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 552
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-07-20
- 修回日期: 2016-09-29
- 发布日期: 2016-10-30

Effects of dairy manure addition from methane production under semi-solid state condition

College of Chemistry, Leshan Normal University, Leshan 614004, China

摘要

摘要: 为了提高油菜秸秆厌氧发酵产甲烷效率，该研究以油菜秸秆和牛粪为原料，采用批次发酵工艺，在半固态（含固率为15%）条件下，通过在油菜秸秆中添加不同量（0、20%、40%、60%、80%和100%）的牛粪（按挥发性固体的质量比计），系统研究不同添加量牛粪对油菜秸秆产甲烷效率的影响，并用修正的Gompertz 方程分析各处理产甲烷过程的动力学特性，旨在为油菜秸秆高效产甲烷提供可靠的工艺参数。结果表明，增加牛粪添加量有助于平衡发酵体系的C/N和提高缓冲性能，物料产甲烷效率随牛粪添加量的增加而增加，但单一牛粪的发酵物料产甲烷效率较低；当牛粪添加量为80%时，发酵物料的C/N为33.60，特殊产甲烷效率（239.87mL/g）和容积产甲烷效率（1.01L/(L·d))最高，分别是其他各处理的1.2～2.0倍和1.3～3.6倍；修正的Gompertz 方程能较好地反映各处理产甲烷动力学过程，在牛粪添加量为80%处理中，模拟预测的最大产甲烷速率Rm、延滞期λ和最短工艺发酵时间T80分别为31.19 mL/(d·g)、1.21d和8.59d，与实验值极其接近。该研究对实际产甲烷工程具有指导意义。
- 秸秆 /
- 甲烷 /
- 粪 /
- 厌氧发酵 /
- 特殊产甲烷效率 /
- 容积产甲烷效率 /
- 动力学参数
Abstract: Abstract: Anaerobic digestion (AD) technology has been given great attention recently for its important role in converting crops residues into methane-rich biogas in China. The methane content in biogas is a carbon-neutral source of renewable energy and has contribute to the reduction of pollution . However, the mono-digestion of crops straw as feedstocks has the low methane yield because it has a complexity and compactness of lignocellulosic biomass structure and the high carbon to nitrogen(C/N) ratio. Several previous studies showed that anaerobic co-digestion had the high methane yield due to the synergistic effect by adding dairy manure (DM) or cattle manure (CM) to crops straw. The synergistic effect was mainly attribute to shorten digestion period, more balanced nutrients and increased buffering capacity. Nevertheless, these studies have focused on improving methane production of anaerobic co-digestion of crops straw with livestock manures based on operating the low total solids (TS) content namely liquid AD (L-AD) with TS concentration of feedstocks less than 10%. Compared to L-AD, the semi-solid AD(S-AD) is ideal for agri-residues and manures with high solids organics, which has TS content between 10% and 20%, and has some advantages such as higher volumetric methane production, higher organic loading rate, lower biogas slurry production, minimized reactor volume, lower energy requirements for warming. There is no literature so far on the evaluation of AD stability and methane production of rape stalk (RS) and DM with different mix ratios in S-AD system. Therefore, in order to improve methane production and provide some reliable technical parameters to efficiently produce methane from rape stalk through AD, the bath anaerobic digestion tests were conducted at semi-solid state(15% total solids content ) using RS and DM at six addition amount (0, 20%, 40%,60%, 80% and 100%) of DM(based on mass ratio of volatile solid),effects of addition amount of DM on the methane production performance of RS were studied, and then the dynamic characteristics of producing methane process were analyzed by the modified Gompertz equation. The results showed that increasing addition amount of DM to RS would balance C/N of digestion feedstock and improve buffering capacity, methane production rate of mixing feedstock was increased with increasing addition amount of DM and pure DM was against to methane production. The highest special methane production rate(SMPR) and methane volumetric production rate(MVPR) of 239.87mL/g and 1.01L/(L·d) were obtained at 80% addition amount of DM and C/N ratio of 33.60, which was 1.2-2.0 times for SMPR and 1.3-3.6 times for MVPR higher than other treatments, respectively. The analysis results of modified Gopermpertz equation indicated that the model had feasibility to describe the dynamic process of AD. Some dynamic parameters were achieved at 80% addition amount of DM and the maximum methane production rate(Rm), the lag phase(λ) and the shortest technical digestion time(T80) was separately 31.19 mL/(d·g), 1.21d and 8.59d. These simulated parameters were very close to the experimental values and had guiding significance in the scale of biogas production from co-digestion with RS and DM.
- straw /
- methane /
- manures /
- anaerobic digestion /
- special methane production rate /
- methane volumetric production rate /
- dynamic parameter

HTML全文

参考文献(34)

[1]	BP公司. BP世界能源统计年鉴（2015年6月）[EB/OL].http: // www. bp.com/statisticalreview.2015-07-02.
[2]	中国石油经济技术研究院. 2014年国内外油气行业发展报告[R].北京:石油工业出版社,2015.
[3]	程序, 崔宗均, 朱万斌. 呼之欲出的中国生物天然气战略性新兴产业[J].天然气工业, 2013, 33(9): 141－148.Cheng Xu, Cui Zongjun, Zhu Wanbin. The upcoming bio-natural gas in China: A strategic emerging industry[J]. Natural gas industry, 2013,33(9):141－148. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	程序,朱万斌. 创建若干10×108 m3级的生物天然气"气田"可行性分析[J].中外能源, 2012,17(7):24－28.Cheng Xu, Zhu Wanbin. Feasibility study into building 10×108m3 biogas fields[J]. Sino-Global energy, 2012, 17(7): 24－28. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2015
[6]	万楚筠, 黄凤洪, 刘睿,等. 微生物预处理油菜秸秆对提高沼气产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(6):267－271.Wan Chuyun, Huang Fenghong, Liu Rui, et al. Effect on increasing biogas production using rape straw by microbiological pretreatment[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2010, 26(6): 267－271. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	韩娅新, 张成明, 陈雪兰,等.不同农业有机废弃物产甲烷特性比较[J].农业工程学报, 2016, 32(1):258－264.Han Yaxin, Zhang Chengming, Chen Xuelan, et al. Methane production performance comparison of different agricultural residues[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(01): 258－264. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	赵蒙蒙, 姜曼, 周祚万. 几种农作物秸秆的成分分析[J]. 材料导报, 2011, 25(16):122－125.Zhao Mengmeng, Jiang Man, Zhou Zuowan. The components analysis of several kinds of agricultural residues[J].Materials review, 2011, 25(16):122－125. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Lehtom?ki A, Huttunen S, Rintala J A. Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: effect of crop to manure ratio [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2007, 51(3): 591－609.
[10]	Li X, Li L, Zheng M, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure with corn stover pretreated by sodium hydroxide for efficient biogas production[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(9): 4635－4639.
[11]	Zheng Z, Liu J, Yuan X, et al. Effect of dairy manure to switchgrass co-digestion ratio on methane production and the bacterial community in batch anaerobic digestion[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 151:249－257.
[12]	马旭光，李传友，袁旭峰，等. 高含固率秸秆和牛粪混合物料发酵产甲烷工艺[J].农业工程学报，2014，30(14):227－235.Ma Xuguang, Li Chuanyou, Yuan Xufeng, et al. Fermentation technology for methane production using high solid content materials with straw and dairy manure[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE), 2014, 30(14): 227－235. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	Amel A G, Doris B, Eric T, et al. Total solids content drives high solid anaerobic digestion via mass transfer limitation[J]. Bioresource technology, 2012, 111(2): 55－61.
[14]	Cui Z, Shi J, Li Y. Solid-state anaerobic digestion of spent wheat straw from horse stall[J]. Bioresource technology, 2011, 102(20): 9432－9437.
[15]	Jha A K, Li J Z, Nies L, et al. Research advances in dry anaerobic digestion process of solid organic wastes[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2011, 10(65): 14242－14253.
[16]	APHA.Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater [M]. 20st ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 2005.
[17]	Guo P, Zhu W, Wang H, et al. Functional characteristics and diversity of a novel lignocelluloses degrading composite microbial system with high xylanase activity[J]. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology, 2010, 20(2): 254－264.
[18]	Wen B, Yuan X, Cao Y, et al. Optimization of liquid fermentation of microbial consortium WSD-5 followed by saccharification and acidification of wheat straw[J]. Bioresource technology, 2012, 118(4): 141－149.
[19]	Herrmann C, Heiermann M, Idler C. Effects of ensiling, silage additives and storage period on methane formation of biogas crops[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(8): 5153－5161.
[20]	Nopharatana A, Pullammanappallil P C, Clarke W P. Kinetics and dynamic modelling of batch anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a stirred reactor [J]. Waste management, 2007, 27(5): 595－603.
[21]	Zhang T, Liu L, Song Z, et al. Biogas production by co-digestion of goat manure with three crop residues[J]. Plos One, 2013, 8(6):e66845.
[22]	Deublein D, Steinhauser A. Biogas from waste and renewable resources: an introduction [M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
[23]	Chandra R, Takeuchi H, Hasegawa T. Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: A review in context to second generation of biofuel production [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(3): 1462－1476.
[24]	El-Shinnawi M M, El-Tahawy B S, El-Shimi S A, et al. Fractionation of organic substances during anaerobic digestion of farm wastes for biogas generation[J]. Mircen Journal of Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 1989, 5(1):27－42.
[25]	South C R, Hogsett D A L, Lynd L R. Modeling simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulose to ethanol in batch and continuous reactors[J]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 1995, 17(9): 797－803.
[26]	罗娟，董宝成，陈羚，等. 畜禽粪便与玉米秸秆厌氧消化的产气特性试验[J]. 农业工程学报，2012，28(10): 219－224.Luo Juan, Dong Baocheng, Chen Ling, et al. Experiments on aerogenesisi characteristics of anaerobic digestion of animal manure and corn straw[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CASE), 2012, 28(10): 219－224. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	Demirbas M F, Balat M, Balat H. Potential contribution of biomass to the sustainable energy development [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2009, 50(7): 1746－1760.
[28]	Forster-Carneiro T, Pérez M, Romero L I. Influence of total solid and inoculum contents on performance of anaerobic reactors treating food waste [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(15): 6994－7002.
[29]	Demirel B, Scherer P. The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: a review [J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2008, 7(2): 173－190.
[30]	Amani T, Nosrati M, Sreekrishnan T R. Anaerobic digestion from the viewpoint of microbiological, chemical, and operational aspects-a review[J]. Environmental Reviews, 2010, 18(1): 255－278.
[31]	Li Y, Park S Y, Zhu J. Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste [J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2011, 15(1): 821－826.
[32]	孙志岩, 张君枝, 刘翌晨,等. 牛粪和玉米秸秆厌氧消化产甲烷潜力及动力学[J].环境工程学报，2016,10(3):1468－1474.Sun Zhiyan, Zhang Junzhi, Liu Yichen,et al. Biochemical methane potential and kinetics of anaerobic digestion of cattle manure campared with corn stover[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016,10(3):1468－1474. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	成喜雨, 李强, 王静,等. 典型秸秆废弃物与猪粪共发酵过程碳氮比的影响研究[J]. 可再生能源, 2014, 32(6):848－853.Cheng Xiyu, Li Qiang, Wang Jing, et al. Effect of carbon/nitrogen ratio on anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with model stalk wastes[J]. Renewable Energy Resources, 2014, 32(6):848－853. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	Kavitha S, Jayashree C, Kumar S A, et al. The enhancement of anaerobic biodegradability of waste activated sludge by surfactant mediated biological pretreatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 168(3):159－166.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

计量

文章访问数: 1350
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 552
被引次数: 0

牛粪添加量对油菜秆半固态发酵产甲烷特性的影响

计量

出版历程

Effects of dairy manure addition from methane production under semi-solid state condition

计量

出版历程

目录