夏季鸡舍屋顶隔热改善舍内热环境及蛋鸡生产性能

    Roof insulation improving thermal environment and laying performance of poultry houses in summer

    • 摘要: 鸡舍屋顶夏季所接收辐射热最多,屋顶内表面与舍内空气对流换热作用较强,舍内垂直温差加剧,造成局部热应激影响蛋鸡生产性能。为探究屋顶隔热对蛋鸡舍内热环境及蛋鸡生产性能的影响,该文对比研究试验舍(100 mm保温玻璃棉毡彩钢板屋顶)与对照舍(200 mm加气混凝土屋顶)2种不同材料屋顶对鸡舍内环境及生产性能的影响,并讨论鸡舍屋顶成本与养鸡经济效益的关系。结果表明:1)试验舍内温湿度波动比对照舍内小,试验舍内平均温度比对照鸡舍低2.3 ℃,对照舍内温度空间上呈垂直分布且温差大于3 ℃,由地面向屋顶逐渐升高且距离地面3.2 m高度水平面温度与0.8、1.6、2.4 m高度水平面温度差异极显著(P<0.01);2)试验舍内热应激程度低于对照舍,对照舍内温湿指标正常水平比试验舍内低15.7%,轻度热应激程度高12.1%,中度热应激程度高1.7%,高度热应激程度高0.9%。对照舍内3.2 m平面上蛋鸡受到不同程度的热应激,高度热应激占2.5%;3)试验舍蛋鸡产蛋率比对照鸡舍高1.5 %,平均蛋质量高1.9 g。对照舍3.2 m平面上蛋鸡产蛋率与距离地面0.8、1.6、2.4 m平面蛋鸡产蛋率差异极显著(P<0.01),周死淘率差异显著(P<0.05);试验舍和对照舍0.8 m平面上蛋鸡平均蛋质量最高,对照舍底层0.8 m平面上蛋鸡平均蛋质量与距离地面1.6、2.4、3.2 m平面蛋鸡的平均蛋质量差异极显著(P<0.01),但破蛋率之间差异不显著(P>0.05);4)对照舍屋顶的冷负荷峰值是试验舍屋顶冷负荷峰值的2.1倍,对照舍屋顶内表面温度比试验舍高3 ℃。试验鸡舍采用隔热屋顶1~1.5 a可收回投入成本,维持舍内热环境以提高蛋鸡养殖户的收入。该研究可为集约化密集型饲养模式下蛋鸡舍的环境调控及节能措施提供参考。

       

      Abstract: In confined poultry buildings, the thermal insulation performance of poultry building construction can have positive impacts on the housing comfortable temperature environment. The ceiling as the main part of poultry house building envelope receives the most radiant heat under high solar insolation. Stronger convection heat transfer between roof inner surface and air increased temperature variations along vertical directions in poultry houses, and higher temperature occurs near the roof of poultry house, resulting in heat stress for the birds near the ceiling. Heat stress usually negatively influences the poultry health, welfare of layers and their production performance. Heat stress has resulted in significant economic losses in large-scale egg productions due to the decrease of egg production rate, the increase of hen mortality and the cost of thermal environment control. Experiments were conducted in 2 poultry houses with different roof types, to determine the effects of roof insulation on thermal environment of poultry houses and egg production rate in hot weather. And the relationship between the roof input cost and the economic benefits of the egg production was discussed. The results showed that: 1) Temperature and humidity fluctuations in experimental poultry house were smaller than that in control poultry house, and temperature in control poultry house was 2.3 ℃ higher than that in experimental poultry house. Temperature was in vertical distribution on the space, and the temperature rose gradually from the ground to the roof. At the height of 3.2 m above the ground air temperature difference was significant (P<0.01), and the vertical temperature difference was greater than 3 ℃. The air temperature also showed vertical distribution in experimental house, but the air temperature difference was not significant at the altitude of 1.6, 2.4 and 3.2 m (P>0.05). 2) Heat stress degree in control poultry house was serious than that in experimental poultry house, and the normal level of temperature and humid in the former was lower by 15.7% compared with that in the latter, alert level was higher by 12.1%, danger level was higher by 1.7% and emergency level was higher by 0.9%. There was no emergency heat stress in experiment poultry house. But the control poultry house was suffered from different degrees of heat stress, and the emergency thermal stress accounted for 2.5% at the altitude of 3.2 m. 3) The average egg production rates in control poultry house and experimental poultry house were 92.5% and 94.0%, respectively, and the average egg weight in control poultry house was 1.9 g less than that in experimental poultry house. Egg production rate at the 3.2 m level was significantly reduced to various degrees compared with the level of 0.8, 1.6 and 2.4 m, respectively (P<0.01), and the mortality rate was very significantly different (P<0.05). There was significant difference of average egg weight between bottom level and other levels (P<0.01), but no significant difference of broken egg rate (P>0.05), and at the bottom level, there was the highest average egg weight. 4) The peak cooling load in control poultry house roof was 2.1 times that in experimental poultry house roof, and the temperature of roof inner surface in the former was 3 ℃ higher than that in the latter. The period of recovery of input cost was 1-1.5 years with insulated roof of experimental poultry house, effectively raising the income of the farmers. This study is expected to provide the theory basis for environmental control and energy saving measures.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回