热源井填砾抽灌同井流/热贯通及温度锋面运移数值模拟

    Numerical simulation on flow/thermal transfixion and temperature front migration of thermal well of pumping & recharging well filled with gravel

    • 摘要: 针对填砾抽灌同井流贯通、热贯通及温度锋面运移研究的不足,该文在已验证的数值模型中建立监测点、线、面和体对以上问题进行量化分析,并将热源井回水经过回填砾石直接流入抽水管的流量占总回水流量的百分比定义为流贯通强度。研究结果表明,填砾抽灌同井回水进入含水层后的流速可以用某一方向的分速度代替;该模型中的流贯通强度为1.2%,热贯通发生与完全形成的时间分别为模型运行2.5和12 min,抽水温度变化较剧烈的时刻与热贯通形成发展的时刻基本一致。在地下水渗流速度大于1×10-3 m/s的区域,速度锋面运移较温度锋面运移快;反之,温度锋面运移快于速度锋面运移。通过对填砾抽灌同井流贯通、热贯通及温度锋面运移的量化分析,为进一步探索填砾抽灌同井最优运行策略和更高换热效率提供了理论基础。

       

      Abstract: The system of pumping & recharging well filled with gravel (PRWFG) is a specific type of the single thermal well used as ground heat exchanger. The heat efficiency of PRWFG is higher than that of the standing column well (SCW) or the traditional pumping & recharging well (PRW). The inlet water of the PRWFG converges and seeps toward the thermal well both horizontally and longitudinally as combined impacts of the positive recharging pressure, the negative pumping pressure and the gravity. During the procedure of seepage, the heat transfers between the inlet water and the water/solids in the aquifer via conduction, convection and thermal dispersion. The amount of heat transferred directly affects the efficiency and the capacity of the thermal well. Due to the low velocity of underground water, heat conduction occurs between the fluid and the solids, as well as between the solids. The heat transfer coefficient is relatively stable if there are certain hydrogeological conditions. Heat convection and thermal dispersion occur in the pores among the solids and the heat transfer coefficients depend on the flow rate of groundwater. A small amount of inlet water enters the outlet water pipe after heat exchanged with the gravel zone and the wall of the thermal well. Considering the facts that normally the porosity of the gravel zone is larger than that of the aquifer, the pressure difference between inlet and outlet water pipes is high and the distance between them is short, flow transfixion is more commonly happened in the thermal well than in the aquifer. Flow transfixion is a process that the inlet water in the thermal well enters the outlet water pipe through the gravel zone and the zone near the wellbore. The flow transfixion leads to a thermal transfixion by mixing water at different temperatures and mixed flow moves to the outlet water pipe. The formation of flow/thermal transfixion reduces the heat transfer efficiency and load-carrying capacity of thermal well. Currently, the bleeding strategy is usually used for decreasing flow/thermal transfixion. With the rapid development of computational fluid dynamics, numerical simulation is widely applied to the field of ground source heat pump. However, lots of researches focus on the aspects such as the thermal response radius of the pumping and recharging wells, the effect of groundwater seepage on the ground heat exchangers, and the characteristic of aquifer thermal energy storage. Considering the fact that there is insufficient research to predict the flow/thermal transfixion and the temperature migration of PRWFG, this paper provides a fundamental study in order to better understand the operation mechanism. The dynamic characteristics of PRWFG are quantitatively studied by establishing observation point, lines, surfaces and volumes based on the validated numerical model. The strength of flow transfixion is defined as the portion of the inlet water flow from the thermal well directly enters the outlet-water pipe through the gravel zone. Results show that the resultant velocity of PRWFG inlet water which flows back to the aquifer can be replaced by the component velocity in a specific direction. In this model, the strength of flow transfixion strength is 1.2 %. The time for the thermal transfixion to start and completely developed is 2.5 and 12 minutes respectively for the model running. It is also observed that during the same period when there are severe variations of the outlet water temperature, the thermal transfixion occurs and develops. In the area within 100 mm from the axis of thermal well, where the seepage velocity of groundwater is higher than 1×10-3 m/s, the velocity front migration is faster than the temperature front migration. On the contrary, the temperature front migration is greater than the velocity front migration. The quantitative analysis of flow transfixion, thermal transfixion and temperature front migration of PRWFG will provide a theoretical basis for further exploration of the optimized operation of the PRWFG system with higher efficiency.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回