王少伟, 李善军, 张衍林, 万强, 陈红, 孟亮. 鼹鼠趾仿生及表面热处理提高齿形开沟刀减阻耐磨性能[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(12): 10-20. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.12.002
    引用本文: 王少伟, 李善军, 张衍林, 万强, 陈红, 孟亮. 鼹鼠趾仿生及表面热处理提高齿形开沟刀减阻耐磨性能[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(12): 10-20. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.12.002
    Wang Shaowei, Li Shanjun, Zhang Yanlin, Wan Qiang, Chen Hong, Meng Liang. Mole toe bionics and surface heat treatment improving resistance reduction and abrasion resistance performance of toothed ditching blade[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(12): 10-20. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.12.002
    Citation: Wang Shaowei, Li Shanjun, Zhang Yanlin, Wan Qiang, Chen Hong, Meng Liang. Mole toe bionics and surface heat treatment improving resistance reduction and abrasion resistance performance of toothed ditching blade[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(12): 10-20. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.12.002

    鼹鼠趾仿生及表面热处理提高齿形开沟刀减阻耐磨性能

    Mole toe bionics and surface heat treatment improving resistance reduction and abrasion resistance performance of toothed ditching blade

    • 摘要: 为提高农用开沟机械开沟刀的减阻耐磨性能,该文针对课题组前期研制的齿形开沟刀,利用仿生结构和不同表面热处理对原齿形开沟刀进行优化。以鼹鼠前爪第3趾为仿生对象,设计了仿生开沟刀。使用EDEM软件进行模拟仿真试验,通过分析齿形开沟刀和仿生开沟刀的开沟功耗,对比2种刀片的减阻性能;进行台架磨损试验,利用金相显微镜、显微硬度仪、摩擦磨损试验机分析5种表面热处理仿生开沟刀的耐磨性能。单齿仿真试验发现,仿生开沟刀刀齿的整体三维表面结构特征有利于减阻。仿真试验结果表明沟深为150、200、250、300和350 mm时,仿生开沟刀比齿形开沟刀的开沟功耗分别降低9.68%、10.44%、10.22%、10.70%和10.95%,仿生开沟刀的减阻性能更优。台架磨损试验结果表明,渗铬淬火高温回火(Ⅱ型刀)、渗碳淬火低温回火(Ⅲ型刀)、激光熔覆WC/Ni60A粉末合金(Ⅳ型刀)和氧乙炔火焰堆焊铸造WC焊条(Ⅴ型刀)比淬火中温回火(Ⅰ型刀)处理的仿生开沟刀的磨损质量分别降低14.17%、42.05%、66.98%和75.96%,Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ和Ⅴ型刀的耐磨性能依次提高,Ⅴ型刀最优。5种刀片组织结构、显微硬度和摩擦系数的分析结果表明,Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ型刀的硬化层显微组织主要为淬火和回火马氏体,Ⅳ和Ⅴ型刀主要为WC硬质相,Ⅳ和Ⅴ型刀的组织结构更优;Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ和Ⅴ型刀的平均显微硬度为558、700、888、1 195和1 441 HV0.1;平均摩擦系数为0.67、0.57、0.26、0.25和0.22,Ⅴ型刀的显微硬度和摩擦系数最优,与台架磨损试验结果相一致。田间试验结果表明,优化后的Ⅲ型和Ⅴ型刀比原来齿形开沟刀的开沟功耗分别降低11.45%和5.41%,磨损质量分别降低28.26%和82.63%,仿生结构优化与表面热处理能够提高齿形开沟刀的减阻耐磨性能。该研究可为提高开沟刀减阻耐磨性能提供参考。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: In the process of agricultural ditching machinery operation, the ditching blade contacts directly with soil. The quality and efficiency of ditching operation are closely related to the performance of ditching blade. Among them, resistance reduction and abrasion resistance performance are the most important. Improving the resistance reduction and abrasion resistance ditching blade can reduce trenching power consumption and improve operation quality, which is beneficial to increasing the service life of the blade, improving operation efficiency and saving economic costs. Moles live underground in most time of their life and have amazing soil-ditching skills. The studys show that third toe of mole's front paw is the most critical tool to ditching soil. In this paper, the third toe of mole's fore paw is taken as an object, and the whole tooth of the toothed ditching blade is replaced by the bionic model of the third toe of mole's fore paw. Firstly, the point cloud data of the third toe of the mole fore paw are obtained by 3D laser scanner. Then, the point cloud data are sparsely processed, spliced and encapsulated, smoothed and denoised by Geomagic studio 2017 software, and the bionic model of the third toe of the mole fore paw is obtained. Then the bionic cutter tooth is used to replace all the teeth of toothed ditching blade. Bionic ditching blades are manufactured using a 3D metal printer. The simulation of ditching process is achieved using EDEM software. Power consumptions of bionic ditching blade are 9.68%, 10.44%, 10.22%, 10.70% and 10.95% less than that of toothed blade separately when ditch depths are 150, 200, 250, 300 and 350 mm. In order to improve the abrasion resistance of bionic ditching blade, five surface heat treatment methods are selected to strengthen the surface of bionic ditching blade: quenching tempering at medium temperature(Blades I), chromizing quenching at high temperature(Blades Ⅱ), carburizing quenching at low temperature(Blades Ⅲ), laser cladding WC/Ni60A powder alloy (WC mass fraction 40%, BladesⅣ) and oxygen-acetylene flame surfacing casting WC electrode (WC mass fraction 60%, Blades V). Abrasion weight of 5 kinds of blades are measured by bench abrasion test. Abrasion weight of Blades II to Blade V are 14.17%, 42.05%, 66.98% and 75.96% less than that of Blade I separately. Hardened layer microstructure of Blades I to Blade III are all martensite, and that of Blades IV and Blasé V are both WC hard phase. Aerage microhardness of Blades I to Blade V are 558, 700, 888, 1 195 and 1 441 HV0.1 respectivly. And average microhardness of Blade II to Blade V are 25.41%, 59.11%, 114.08% and 158.17% higher than that of Blade I. Abrasion types of Blade I and Blade II are both adhesive abrasion, and average friction factors are 0.67 and 0.57 respectivly. Abrasion types of Blade III and Blade V are abrasive abrasion, and average friction factors are 0.26, 0.25 and 0.22. Field test is completed to compare differences between resistance reduction and abrasion resistance performance of 3 blades. Power consumption of Blade III and Blade V are 11.45% and 5.41% lower than that of toothed blade. Average abrasion weight of Blade III and Blade V are 28.26% and 82.63% less than that of toothed blade. The results can provide references for improving resistance reduction and abrasion resistance performance of ditching blades.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回