杨鸿琨, 苏正安, 朱大鹏, 何周窈, 周涛, 熊东红, 方海东, 史亮涛. 集水区耕作对干热河谷冲沟沟头溯源侵蚀过程的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(21): 151-157. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.21.018
    引用本文: 杨鸿琨, 苏正安, 朱大鹏, 何周窈, 周涛, 熊东红, 方海东, 史亮涛. 集水区耕作对干热河谷冲沟沟头溯源侵蚀过程的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(21): 151-157. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.21.018
    Yang Hongkun, Su Zheng’an, Zhu Dapeng, He Zhouyao, Zhou Tao, Xiong Donghong, Fang Haidong, Shi Liangtao. Effect of cultivation in upstream catchment on gully headcut erosion process in dry-hot valley[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(21): 151-157. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.21.018
    Citation: Yang Hongkun, Su Zheng’an, Zhu Dapeng, He Zhouyao, Zhou Tao, Xiong Donghong, Fang Haidong, Shi Liangtao. Effect of cultivation in upstream catchment on gully headcut erosion process in dry-hot valley[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(21): 151-157. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.21.018

    集水区耕作对干热河谷冲沟沟头溯源侵蚀过程的影响

    Effect of cultivation in upstream catchment on gully headcut erosion process in dry-hot valley

    • 摘要: 为探明集水区耕作对金沙江干热河谷冲沟沟头溯源侵蚀过程的影响,该文选取一条仍处于发育阶段的冲沟沟头及其集水区构建了4个原位试验小区,集水区分别为裸地(无人类活动且植被盖地低于5%)和一年3次耕作2种处理,然后进行原位放水冲刷试验来模拟冲沟沟头溯源侵蚀过程。结果表明:1)随着冲刷时间的持续,两种处理下原位试验小区各部位的土壤侵蚀速率时间变化趋势一致,均呈先减少后逐渐趋于稳定趋势,耕作活动会显著增加集水区的土壤侵蚀速率(约为裸地的1.62倍),耕作对沟壁、沟床部位的土壤的侵蚀速率并无显著影响。2)耕作后,冲沟沟头不同部位的径流阻力系数均出现了显著增加,与裸地相比,耕作后集水区、沟床的阻力系数分别提高了约6.96倍和2倍。与此同时,随着冲刷时间的增加,裸地冲沟的径流阻力系数呈现出先增大后逐渐趋于稳定的趋势,而耕作后冲沟的径流阻力系数则呈现出先减小后逐渐趋于稳定的趋势。3)随着冲刷时间的持续,两种处理下冲沟沟头的径流能耗、侵蚀单位土体的径流能耗均呈现出先增加后趋于稳定的趋势;集水区农耕活动并未对冲沟各部位的径流总能耗产生明显影响,但耕作会对侵蚀单位土体的径流能耗产生显著影响,耕作状态下集水区侵蚀单位土体径流能耗比裸地降低了约50%。因此,在集水区部位进行耕作活动,会导致集水区径流阻力系数增加和侵蚀单位土体径流能耗降低,并显著增加坡沟系统的侵蚀量,但是对冲沟溯源侵蚀速率影响有限。

       

      Abstract: Abstract:The development of gully erosion has seriously threatened the local ecological environment and social and economic development in dry-hot valley region of Jinsha River. In order to explore the influence of catchment cultivation on the headstream erosion process in the dry-hot valley, an active gully head was selected to construct four in-situ experimental plots, which is located in the Gully Erosion and Collapse Experimental Station in Yuanmou Dry-Hot Valley. Along the vertical section from the gully catchment area to the gully bed, the gully was divided into 4 test plots, each of which was divided into three parts: the gully catchment area, the gully wall and the gully bed. A series of in-situ scouring experiments were carried out. The flow rates were set at 30, 60, 90 and 120 L/min based on local rainfall intensity. The runoff and erosion characteristics of different parts of gully head under bare land and cultivated land in the upstream catchment area were researched. For the bare land in the upstream catchment area, it was considered as bare land gully. For the cultivated land in the upstream catchment area, it was considered as cultivated land gully. The results showed that: The soil erosion rate of upstream catchment area of cultivated land was higher than that of bare land, while no significant difference in soil erosion rate could be found at gully wall between bare land gully and cultivated land gully. Meanwhile, no significant difference in soil erosion rate could be found at gully bed between bare land gully and cultivated land gully. As the experiment progressed, temporal variation in soil erosion rates of bare land gully was similar with that of cultivated land gully. Compared to the bare land, the resistance coefficient of runoff (f) was higher in the cultivated land in upstream catchment of bank gully. Compared to bare land gully, the resistance coefficients of upstream catchment area and gully bed in cultivated land gully increased by 6.96 times and 2 times, respectively. For bare land gully, a gradually increasing trend in f was observed in the upstream catchment areas and downstream gully beds. However, a decreasing trend in f was observed in the cultivated land gully over time. For different parts of the gully, cultivation had no significant effect on the energy consumption of runoff, but it had a significant effect on the energy consumption of runoff per unit soil loss. Runoff energy consumption per unit soil loss in upstream catchment area of cultivated land gully decreased by about 50% compared with that of bare land gully. As a result, cultivation could increase soil resistance coefficient and soil erosion rate, while decrease energy consumption of runoff per unit soil loss in the upstream catchment area of gully. It should be noted that no significant differences in soil erosion rate and the energy consumption of runoff in the gully wall and gully bed could be found between cultivated land gully and bare land gully.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回