刘玉, 唐林楠, 潘瑜春. 村域尺度的不同乡村发展类型多功能特征与振兴方略[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(22): 9-17. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.22.002
    引用本文: 刘玉, 唐林楠, 潘瑜春. 村域尺度的不同乡村发展类型多功能特征与振兴方略[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(22): 9-17. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.22.002
    Liu Yu, Tang Linnan, Pan Yuchun. Multifunctional characteristics and revitalization strategies of different types of rural development at village scale[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(22): 9-17. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.22.002
    Citation: Liu Yu, Tang Linnan, Pan Yuchun. Multifunctional characteristics and revitalization strategies of different types of rural development at village scale[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(22): 9-17. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.22.002

    村域尺度的不同乡村发展类型多功能特征与振兴方略

    Multifunctional characteristics and revitalization strategies of different types of rural development at village scale

    • 摘要: 村域是中国农村社会经济活动的基本单元,科学划分乡村发展类型是分区分类推进乡村振兴的基础和关键。该研究在考虑规划约束的前提下,从经济条件、交通区位、资源禀赋和生态环境质量4个维度构建密云区乡村综合发展评价指标体系,并借助SOFM网络模型和地理探测器工具系统划分乡村发展类型。结果表明:1)在经济发展、交通区位等综合影响下,密云区乡村发展的空间分异特征明显,其发展水平总体呈现"水库南部>水库北部"的特点。其中,密云镇、穆家峪镇和十里堡镇内的乡村发展最为突出,其乡村发展均处于较高级别以上;古北口镇和新城子镇的乡村发展弱。2)将密云区乡村划分为经济交通主导高水平区、交通生态主导高水平区、资源生态主导中高水平区等7大类,其中交通生态主导高水平区和经济生态主导中高水平区是主要的乡村发展类型,集中分布在不老屯、大城子、巨各庄、穆家峪、西田各庄、冯家峪和溪翁庄等镇。交通生态主导高水平区村庄生态环境质量较高,交通区位优势明显,叠加上较强的经济实力,乡村综合发展水平高。经济生态主导中高水平区村庄具有较强的经济发展水平和生态环境质量,乡村综合发展水平也较高。3)基于多功能视角梳理各类型区的功能特征,遵循"重点发展优势功能、适度提升弱势功能"的思路提出村庄振兴建议,以期为制订差异化的乡村振兴策略提供依据。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: Village is the basic unit of rural social and economic activities in China. In accordance with the law of village development and the trend of evolution, it's of great significance to carry forward rural revitalization by zoning and classification on the basis of scientific recognition of suitable development types for various villages. Considering planning constraints, in this study, a comprehensive development evaluation index system was established in four dimensions of economic conditions, traffic location, resources and ecological environment. Among the index system, indicators such as the proportion of construction land area during the planning period and the distance from the urban core area belonged to the type of planning constraints, which reflected the impact of planning and the urban core area on the future development of the countryside; the rest were the status quo description category ones, representing the status quo level of rural development. After calculating and analyzing the status of integrated rural development, rural development types and multi-functional characteristics were identified by use of tools and systems such as SOFM network model and GeoDetector. In the process above, the SOFM model was used to obtain scientific and objective classification results which ranged from 2 to 16 categories, and then, the GeoDetector was used to obtain the number of best rural areas. The results showed that Under the influence of economic development, traffic location and other factors, development of villages in Miyun District differentiate largely in space, and the development level of area on the south of reservoir was generally better than the area on the north of reservoir. Miyun Town, Mujiayu Town and Shilipu Town thrived best and their rural developments were at a high level while Gubeikou and Xinchengzi Town developed most slowly. Our results also showed that villages in Miyun District were divided into seven zones such as traffic and ecology dominant high-level zone and resource and ecology dominant medium-high level zone. Traffic and ecology dominant and economy & ecology dominant high-level zones were the primary types of rural development. These two zones were mainly located in Bulaotun, Dachengzi, Jugezhuang, Mujiayu, Xitiangezhuang, Fengjiayu and Xiwengzhuang. With high quality of ecological environment, advantageous traffic location and strong economic development, villages in traffic and ecology dominant high-level zone showed high-level comprehensive development. Villages in economy and ecology dominant medium-high level zone had a strong economic development and great ecological environment, so they also achieved high-level comprehensive development. In addition, the results showed functional characteristics of different types of zone were summarized from a multi-functional prospective and suggestions for rural revitalization were proposed in accordance with the idea of "focusing on advantageous functions and properly improving disadvantageous functions" in order to guide the establishment of differential rural revitalization strategy. Overall, the results of the classification of rural development types based on SOFM and GeoDetector generally accorded with the regional reality, and can reflect the development differences of different dimensions of seven zones, as well as the impact of planning constraints on rural development. The conclusions can provide evidence for the rural revitalization practice in Miyun District.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回