方一舒, 艾东, 祖健, 孙玮健. 基本农田保护区共同体活力评价研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(22): 90-98. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.22.010
    引用本文: 方一舒, 艾东, 祖健, 孙玮健. 基本农田保护区共同体活力评价研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(22): 90-98. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.22.010
    Fang Yishu, Ai Dong, Zu Jian, Sun Weijian. Vitality evaluation of basic farmland protection zone community[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(22): 90-98. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.22.010
    Citation: Fang Yishu, Ai Dong, Zu Jian, Sun Weijian. Vitality evaluation of basic farmland protection zone community[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(22): 90-98. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.22.010

    基本农田保护区共同体活力评价研究

    Vitality evaluation of basic farmland protection zone community

    • 摘要: 当前,中国进行基本农田保护区建设时较多关注基本农田自身的功能质量,而忽略基本农田与配套基础设施、生态用地之间的关系,缺乏"共治共建、同管同护"的意识,为实现基本农田保护区的效率最大化,该文将基本农田保护区看作一个生命共同体,从概念内涵、理论框架、生命活力评价、生命体征识别和措施建议等方面开展研究,并以河北省曲周县进行实证研究。主要结论如下:1)针对当前基本农田保护存在的问题,在国内外研究的基础上,将基本农田保护区共同体的内涵界定为以基本农田保护区为主体,对基本农田、基础配套设施以及小块生态用地进行共同保护的生命共同体;2)通过构建共同体活力评价体系,从生存力、发展力、稳定力和环境压力4个方面进行评价,得出2009-2017年曲周县基本农田保护区共同体活力状态较为稳定,在Ⅱ级与Ⅲ级状态之间波动;3)从乡镇的空间分布来看,年际间呈现出活力水平先上升后下降的趋势,2013年活力评价水平处于Ⅱ级状态的乡镇最多,并呈现活力水平较高的乡镇沿路网分布的规律。研究结果可为加强基本农田保护区生命共同体建设,保持基本农田可持续发展提供有力支撑。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: At present, when constructing basic farmland protection zone in China, they always pay more attention to the functional quality of basic farmland itself, while ignoring the relationship between basic farmland and supporting infrastructure and ecological land, and lack of awareness of "co-governing, co-construction, and management". There is an increasingly intensified contradiction between the agricultural production and the development of construction land.The quantity,landscape and ecological systerm of basic farmland protection zone have been affected. In order to solve this main contradiction, this paper analyzes the theoretical framework system of the basic farmland protection community, and builds the basic farmland protection zone community vitality evaluation index system, taking Quzhou county, a typical agricultural county in the Huanghuaihai Plain, as the case zone.According to the research path of the basic farmland protection zone community "factor status analysis-community vitality assessment-damaged living body identification-comprehensive management and protection recommendations", the community has conducted a more deep research in the three basic time points of 2009, 2013 and 2017. On this basis, the main conclusions of this paper are as follows:1)In view of the problems existing in the current basic farmland protection, on the basis of domestic and foreign research, the meaning of the basic farmland protectionzone community is defined as a community of life for mutual protection includes basic farmland, basic supporting facilities and small ecological space; 2)Based on the theory of life community, the indicators in the evaluation index system of the basic farmland protection community are divided into four aspects: survivability, development, stability and environmental pressure.Then the analytic hierarchy process is used to determine the level of the indicator system weights; 3)The basic farmland protection zone community is relatively stable and fluctuates between Level II and Level III. In 2009, the evaluation level of Quzhou county basic farmland protection zone community vitality was in the state of Grade III. Except Quzhou Town was in Grade II state, and the rest of the towns and villages were in Grade III state. In 2013, the evaluation of Quzhou county basic farmland protection zone community vitality is in the state of II, Quzhou town, Houcun town, Yanqiao township and Dahedao township are in grade II state, and the remaining townships are in Grade III state; in 2017, the evaluation of Quzhou county basic farmland protection zone community vitality is in Level III, except Quzhou town and Dahedao township are in the second-level state, and the rest of the townships are in the state of Grade III; 4)From the perspective of the spatial distribution of towns and villages, the trend of the level of vitality first rises and then declines during the inter-annual period. In 2013, the level of vitality evaluation was the highest in the township level II, and the distribution pattern of townships along the road network with higher vitality level was presented. The research results can provide a strong basis for strengthening the construction of the basic farmland life community knowledge system and comprehensive land improvement.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回