射流三通产生的脉冲波对灌水器水力与抗堵塞特性的影响

王新坤; 靳彬彬; 樊二东; 姚吉成; 张晨曦; 王轩; 薛子龙

doi:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.02.014

射流三通产生的脉冲波对灌水器水力与抗堵塞特性的影响

江苏大学流体机械工程技术研究中心，镇江 212013

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51579116）；江苏省科技计划项目（BE2018373）

计量
- 文章访问数: 939
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 309
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-07-16
- 修回日期: 2019-12-07
- 发布日期: 2020-01-14

Effects of high frequency pulse produced by jet tee on hydraulic and anti-clogging characteristics of emitters

Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China

摘要

摘要: 该文应用CFD两相流模拟与水力试验相结合的方法，研究射流三通产生的脉冲水流对灌水器流道水力性能和抗堵塞性能的影响。进行射流三通水力性能试验，获取其脉冲参数（振幅、周期），用以生成波动压力，为数值模拟提供参考；对比射流三通、普通三通下定制灌水器出口流量的模拟值与实测值，验证模拟方法的可行性；数值模拟研究不同时刻脉冲条件下含沙量在流道的分布情况和不同密度、不同粒径颗粒的运动路径及速度变化。结果表明，射流三通产生的波形与同参数正弦波波形类似，可由正弦波代替射流三通波进行模拟。射流三通波形压力和恒压下的流量的实测值与模拟值之间的相对误差在7%以内；脉冲条件下灌水器流道的主流区和漩涡区都具有脉冲性能。脉冲条件下流道最大含沙量低于恒压条件下的22%。同一密度不同粒径条件下，恒压条件高于脉冲水流下颗粒路径的1.21%～26.9%，同一粒径不同密度条件下，恒压高于脉冲水流条件颗粒路径的3.25%～9.6%。综上，射流三通产生的脉冲波能够提高水流的挟沙能力和抗堵塞性能。
- 颗粒 /
- 流量 /
- CFD /
- 灌水器 /
- 射流三通 /
- 脉冲波 /
- 水沙两相流 /
- 抗堵塞
Abstract: Abstract: The anti-clogging mechanism of pulsed water produced by jet tee in drip irrigation system is unclear. In this study, the influence of pulse wave generated by jet tee on hydraulic and anti-clogging properties was investigated. The flow depth of emitter used by the simulation and test was 1.87 mm, the dentation height was 2.17 mm, the tooth tip distance was 2.07 mm and the corner of runner was 16o. The hydraulic performance test of jet tee was carried out to obtain its pulse parameters (amplitude, period) and to verify the predictions of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The fluctuating pressure with the same pulse frequency as the jet tee was as the pressure inlet boundary condition of CFD. The internal flow of the emitter was described by CFD based on solid-liquid two-phase turbulent model established. The sediment concentration distribution and particles motion path in the emitter channels were obtained by CFD. The waveform produced by the jet tee was similar to the sine wave with the same parameters. A sine wave instead of a jet ternary wave was used for simulation. The relative error between the measured value and the simulated value of the pressure and constant pressure of the jet three-way waveform was samller than 7%. When the inlet water pressure was the same, the average flow rate of the dripper under pulsed water pressure was always smaller than that under constant water pressure. Under the pulse condition, the main flow area and the vortex area of the irrigation channel had pulse performance, and the maximum particle content of the flow channel was lower than 22% under constant pressure. Under the same particle density and different particle size conditions, the particle path in the constant pressure flow was from 1.21% to 26.9%, which was higher than that in the pulse flow. With the increase of particle size, the number of times of the minimum velocity increased, and the instantaneous velocity decreased with the same distance of particle movement. Under the same particle size and different particle density conditions, the particle path in the constant pressure flow was from 3.25% to 9.6%, which was higher than that in the pulse flow. The increase of particle path under the different particle density conditions was smaller than that under the particle size conditions. The comparative analysis above shows that the pulse wave generated by the jet tee would improve the sand-holding ability and anti-blocking performance of the water flow.
- particles /
- flow rate /
- computational fluid dynamics /
- emitter /
- jet tee /
- pulse /
- water-sediment two-phase flow /
- anti-clogging

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	曹建生，张万军. 微灌节水技术与机理研究[J]. 节水灌溉，2000(6)：5－7，18.Cao Jiansheng, Zhang Wanjun. Study on WS technique and mechanism for micro-irrigation[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2000(6): 5－7, 18. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	李久生，栗岩峰，王军，等. 微灌在中国：历史、现状和未来[J]. 水利学报，2016，47(3)：372－381.Li Jiusheng, Dai Yanfeng, Wang Jun, et al. Microirrigation in China:History,current situation and prospects[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2016, 47(3): 372－381. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	王聪. 波动水压对灌水器水力性能影响的实验研究[D]. 武汉：华中科技大学，2011.Wang Cong. Research on Experiment of the Effect of Dynamic Pressure on the Hydraulic Properties of Drip Emitters[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	李云开，周博，杨培岭. 滴灌系统灌水器堵塞机理与控制方法研究进展[J]. 水利学报，2018，49(1)：103－114.Li Yunkai, Zhou Bo, Yang Peiling.Research advances in drip irrigation emitter clogging mechanism and controlling methods[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2018, 49(1): 103－114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	魏正英，赵万华，唐一平，等. 滴灌灌水器迷宫流道主航道抗堵设计方法研究[J]. 农业工程学报，2005，21(6)：1－7.Wei Zhengying, Zhao Wanhua, Tang Yiping, et al. Anti-clogging design method for the labyrinth channels of drip irrigation emitters[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2005, 21(6): 1－7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	牛文全，吴普特，喻黎明. 基于含沙量等值线的迷宫流道结构抗堵塞设计与模拟[J]. 农业工程学报，2010，26(5)：14－20.Niu Wenquan, Wu Pute, Yu Liming. Anti-clogging experimental investigation and optimized design of micro-channels of emitter based on isoline of sand content[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2010, 26(5): 14－20. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	芦刚，史玉升，魏青松，等. 基于两相流模拟的高抗堵滴灌灌水器开发方法[J]. 华中科技大学学报：自然科学版，2007，35(7)：118－121.Lu Gang, Shi Yusheng, Wei Qingsong, et al. A development method for high anti-clogged drip emitters based on two-phase flow simulations[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Nature Science Edition, 2007, 35(7): 118－121. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	魏正英，唐一平，温聚英，等. 灌水器微细流道水沙两相流分析和微PIV及抗堵实验研究[J]. 农业工程学报，2008，24(6)：1－9.Wei Zhengying, Tang Yiping, Wen Juying, et al. Two-phase flow analysis and experimental investigation of micro-PIV and anti-clogging for micro-channels of emitter[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2008, 24(6): 1－9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	葛令行，魏正英，曹蒙，等. 微小迷宫流道中的沙粒沉积规律[J]. 农业工程学报，2010，26(3)：20－24.Ge Lingxing, Wei Zhengying, Cao Meng, et al. Deposition law of sand in labyrinth-channel of emitter[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2010, 26(3): 20－24. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	喻黎明，邹小艳，谭弘，等. 基于CFD-DEM耦合的水力旋流器水沙运动三维数值模拟[J]. 农业机械学报，2016，47(1)：126－132.Yu Liming, Zou Xiaoyan, Tan Hong, et al. 3D numerical simulation of water and sediment flow in hydrocyclone based on coupled CFD-DEM[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultultural Machinery, 2016, 47(1): 126－132. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	郑超，吴普特，张林，等. 不同动态水压模式下迷宫流道内颗粒物运动特性研究[J]. 农业机械学报，2017，48(3)：294－301.Zheng Chao, Wu Pute, Zhang Lin, et al. Particles movement characteristics in labyrinth channel under different dynamic water pressure modes[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(3): 294－301. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	郑超，吴普特，张林，等. 动态水压下迷宫流道水流运动特性研究[J]. 农业机械学报，2015，46(9)：167－172.Zheng Chao, Wu Pute, Zhang Lin, et al. Flow characteristics in labyrinth channel under dynamic water pressure[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultultural Machinery, 2015, 46(9): 167－172. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	芦刚. 工作水压对滴灌灌水器水力性能影响规律的研究[D]. 武汉：华中科技大学，2010.Lu Gang. Search on Influence Laws of the Operating Water Pressure on Hydraulic Properties of Drip emitters[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2010. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	王新坤. 一种射流三通：CN103203293A[P]. 2013-07-17.
[15]	杨玉超. 射流脉冲三通振荡特性影响因素研究[D]. 镇江：江苏大学，2016.Yang Yuchao. Study on Influence Factors of Oscillation Performance of Jet-pulse Tee[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	许鹏，王新坤，高世凯，等. 射流振荡三通与滴灌毛管脉冲初步试验研究[J]. 节水灌溉，2014(3)：1－4，8.Xu Peng, Wang Xinkun, Gao Shikai, et al. Preliminary test of jet oscillation tee and pulse flow in drip irrigation lateral pipe[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2014(3): 1－4,8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	杨玉超，王新坤，朱燕翔，等. 基于射流脉冲三通的滴灌带试验研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电，2015(9)：111－114.Yang Yuchao, Wag Xinkun, Zhu Yanxiang, et al. An experimental study of the jet pulse tee based on drip irrigation pipes[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2015(9): 111－114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	樊二东，王新坤，肖思强，等. 基于喷嘴宽度对射流三通水力性能试验与模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报，2018，36(9)：836－840.Fan Erdong, Wang Xinkun, Xiao Siqiang, et al. Experiment and simulation of hydraulic performance of three-way pulse jet tee with various nozzle widths[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2018, 36(9): 836－840. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	王新坤，肖思强，樊二东，等. 滴灌毛管首部射流脉冲三通及水力特性试验研究[J]. 农业工程学报，2017，33(12)：116－121.Wang Xinkun, Xiao Siqiang, Fan Erdong, et al. Hydraulic performance experiment of lateral pipe jet-pulse tee[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2017, 33(12): 116－121. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	肖思强，王新坤，徐胜荣，等. 射流脉冲三通毛管灌水均匀性试验研究[J]. 排灌机械工程学报，2018，36(7)：632－638.Xiao Siqiang, Wang Xinkun, Xu Shengrong, et al. Experimental study on irrigation uniformity of lateral pipe with jet-pulse tees[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2018, 36(7): 632－638. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	王新坤，靳彬彬，樊二东，等. 高频脉冲条件下灌水器水沙两相流数值模拟[J/OL].农业机械学报，2020. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1964.S.20191211.1517.014.html.Wang Xinkun, Jin Binbin, Fan Erdong, et al. Numerical simulation of water-sediment two-phase flow in emitter under high frequency pulse[J/OL]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultultural Machinery, 2020. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1964.S.20191211.1517.014. html. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	王新坤，樊二东，徐胜荣，等.射流三通对灌水器抗堵塞特性的影响[J]. 农业机械学报，2019，50(3)：281－287.Wang Xinkun, Fan Erdong , Xu Shengrong, et al. Effect of jet tee on anti-clogging characteristics of emitters[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultultural Machinery, 2019, 50(3): 281－287. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	骆志文. 水动比例注入泵性能参数研究[D]. 镇江：江苏大学，2017.Luo Zhiwen. Research on Performance Parameters of Water-powered Proportional Dosing Pump[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	马峥，黄少锋，朱德祥. 湍流模型在船舶计算流体力学中的适用性研究[J]. 水动力学研究与进展：A辑，2009，24(2)：207－216.Ma Zheng, Huang Shaofeng, Zhu Dexiang. Study on applicability of turbulence model in ship computational fluid dynamics[J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 24(2): 207－216. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	李云开，刘世荣，杨培岭，等. 滴头锯齿型迷宫流道消能特性的流体动力学分析[J]. 农业机械学报，2007，38(12)：49－52.Li Yunkai, Liu Shirong, Yang Peiling, et al. Hydrokinetics analysis on the pressure losses in sawtooth-labyrinth path drip irrigation emitters[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultultural Machinery, 2007, 38(12): 49－52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	喻黎明，徐霞，杨启良，等. 滴灌灌水器迷宫流道结构对泥沙运动的影响[J]. 农业机械学报，2017，48(2)：255－261.Yu Liming, Xu Xia, Yang Qiliang, et al. Influence of geometrical parameters of labyrinth passage of drip irrigation emitter on sand movement[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultultural Machinery, 2017, 48(2): 255－261. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	魏正英，唐一平，温聚英，等. 灌水器微细流道水沙两相流分析和微PIV及抗堵实验研究[J]. 农业工程学报，2008，24(6)：1－9.Wei Zhengying, Tang Yiping, Wen Juying, et al. Two-phase flow analysis and experimental investigation of micro-PIV and anti-clogging for micro-channels of emitter[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2008, 24(6): 1－9. (in Chinese with English abstract)

施引文献(49)

期刊类型引用(28)

1.	林娜，陈宏，谢骞，赵健. 基于决策融合的南方复杂地区覆膜农田信息快速提取研究. 安徽农业科学. 2025(03): 229-235+242 . 百度学术
2.	曾世伟，侯学会，王宗良，骆秀斌，巫志雄，王宏军. 基于无人机遥感的作物表型参数获取和应用研究进展. 山东农业科学. 2024(04): 172-180 . 百度学术
3.	孙月平，刘勇，郭佩璇，李自强，孟祥汶，赵德安. 基于改进YOLOv8n-seg的蟹塘水草区域分割与定位方法. 农业工程学报. 2024(17): 224-233 . 本站查看
4.	王宝龙，刘建. “无人机多光谱”技术在园艺生产装备与技术课程案例教学中的应用. 热带农业工程. 2024(06): 157-160 . 百度学术
5.	张新长，黄健锋，宁婷. 高分辨率遥感影像耕地提取研究进展与展望. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). 2023(10): 1582-1590 . 百度学术
6.	孙智虎，张锦水，洪友堂，杨珺雯，朱爽. GF-7卫星多角度特征作物识别. 遥感学报. 2023(09): 2127-2138 . 百度学术
7.	胡敏，周波. 基于图像分割的无人机遥感影像目标提取技术. 黑龙江工业学院学报(综合版). 2022(01): 93-97 . 百度学术
8.	郑文慧，王润红，曹银轩，靳宁，冯浩，何建强. 基于Google Earth Engine的黄土高原覆膜农田遥感识别. 农业机械学报. 2022(01): 224-234 . 百度学术
9.	段晨阳，冯建中，全斌，白林燕，王盼盼. 利用深度学习进行GF-6影像枣园检测识别. 测绘通报. 2022(03): 54-59 . 百度学术
10.	刘莹，朱秀芳，徐昆. 用于灌溉耕地制图的特征变量优选. 农业工程学报. 2022(03): 119-127 . 本站查看
11.	张超，陈畅，徐海清，薛琳. 基于XGBoost算法的多云多雾地区多源遥感作物识别. 农业机械学报. 2022(04): 149-156 . 百度学术
12.	翟志强，陈学庚，邱发松，孟庆建，王海渊，张若宇 . 基于像素块和机器学习的播前棉田地表残膜覆盖率检测. 农业工程学报. 2022(06): 140-147 . 本站查看
13.	卢征. 基于特征点匹配的无人机遥感图像快速拼接系统. 电子设计工程. 2022(12): 83-87 . 百度学术
14.	王亚妮，周银朋. 基于无人机测绘的复杂地形图像特征提取方法. 电子设计工程. 2022(19): 149-152+158 . 百度学术
15.	李安琦，马丽，于合龙，张涵博. 改进的U-Net算法在遥感图像典型农作物分类研究. 红外与激光工程. 2022(09): 428-434 . 百度学术
16.	邱晓磊. 基于局部加权拟合算法的无人机遥感影像多尺度检测技术. 计算机测量与控制. 2021(02): 25-29 . 百度学术
17.	朱松松，陈至坤. 基于K均值聚类的棉田地膜无人机图像分割. 现代计算机. 2021(02): 73-77 . 百度学术
18.	杨蜀秦，宋志双，尹瀚平，张智韬，宁纪锋. 基于深度语义分割的无人机多光谱遥感作物分类方法. 农业机械学报. 2021(03): 185-192 . 百度学术
19.	张学军，黄爽，靳伟，鄢金山，史增录，周鑫城，张朝书. 基于改进Faster R-CNN的农田残膜识别方法. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(08): 161-168 . 百度学术
20.	邓泓，杨滢婷，刘兆朋，刘木华，陈雄飞，刘鑫. 基于深度学习的无人机水田图像语义分割方法. 中国农机化学报. 2021(10): 165-172 . 百度学术
21.	赵静，闫春雨，杨东建，温昱婷，黎文华，鲁力群，兰玉彬. 基于无人机多光谱遥感的台风灾后玉米倒伏信息提取. 农业工程学报. 2021(24): 56-64 . 本站查看
22.	唐雅娜，史春笑. 基于大数据的遥感图像智能识别方法研究. 计算机产品与流通. 2020(04): 139 . 百度学术
23.	李志铭，赵静，兰玉彬，崔欣，杨焕波. 基于无人机可见光图像的作物分类研究. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(06): 137-144+154 . 百度学术
24.	吴雪梅，梁长江，张大斌，喻丽华，张富贵. 基于无人机遥感影像的收获期后残膜识别方法. 农业机械学报. 2020(08): 189-195 . 百度学术
25.	王小芹，张志梅，邵烨，王常颖，张小峰. 词袋模型在高分遥感影像地物分类中的应用研究. 现代电子技术. 2020(17): 56-59 . 百度学术
26.	张天柱，张凤荣，黄敬文，李超，张佰林. 工业化区域撂荒耕地空间格局演变及影响因素分析. 农业工程学报. 2019(15): 246-255 . 本站查看
27.	景云鹏，刘刚，金志坤. GNSS双天线结合AHRS测量农田地形. 农业工程学报. 2019(21): 166-174 . 本站查看
28.	杨勇强，王振锡，师玉霞，连玲，高亚利. 基于无人机遥感的天山云杉林密度估测研究. 新疆农业大学学报. 2019(03): 194-201 . 百度学术