• EI
    • CSA
    • CABI
    • 卓越期刊
    • CA
    • Scopus
    • CSCD
    • 核心期刊

基于两维图论聚类的辽宁省土地利用多功能性分区

张露洋, 雷国平, 郭一洋

张露洋, 雷国平, 郭一洋. 基于两维图论聚类的辽宁省土地利用多功能性分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(13): 242-249. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.13.028
引用本文: 张露洋, 雷国平, 郭一洋. 基于两维图论聚类的辽宁省土地利用多功能性分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(13): 242-249. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.13.028
Zhang Luyang, Lei Guoping, Guo Yiyang. Graph-theoretic clustering for zoning of multifunctional land use in Liaoning Province, China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(13): 242-249. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.13.028
Citation: Zhang Luyang, Lei Guoping, Guo Yiyang. Graph-theoretic clustering for zoning of multifunctional land use in Liaoning Province, China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(13): 242-249. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.13.028

基于两维图论聚类的辽宁省土地利用多功能性分区

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(41671520)

Graph-theoretic clustering for zoning of multifunctional land use in Liaoning Province, China

  • 摘要: 辽宁省土地利用功能间的矛盾相对突出,明晰区域土地利用多功能的现状、进行土地利用多功能性分区可为促进区域土地利用功能的协调发展提供依据。选取2017年辽宁省县域土地利用生活、生产、生态方面22个典型指标构建区域土地利用多功能性评价指标体系,运用熵权法和两维图论聚类法进行土地利用多功能性评价及分区研究。研究发现:1)研究区生活功能高值区于中部呈斜"X"状分布,生产功能值主要呈现以沈阳为中心的"环状"递减蔓延结构,生态功能值由外至内逐渐减少。2)区域县域生产功能和生活功能呈显著正相关,生产功能和生态功能呈显著负相关。3)根据区域土地利用多功能值和两维图论聚类法可将研究区划分为辽东生态功能优势区、辽北功能欠协调区、辽南功能相对均衡区以及辽西功能欠发展区。研究结果可为县域尺度国土空间规划的制定与实施等提供技术支撑和科学依据。
    Abstract: Unbalanced land use and multifunctionality have posed a great challenge in Liaoning Province, northeast China. There is an urgent need to conduct a multifunctional evaluation system for regional land use, particularly on zoning assessment. In this study, 22 typical indicators were selected from the three aspects of land use, including living, production, and ecology function. An entropy weighting method was applied to calculate the weights of indicators, and then to obtain the mean values of land use life, production, and ecological function in the study area in 2017. A two-dimensional graph-theoretic clustering method was used to integrate the spatial connectivity and indicator similarity between the zoning units. In a weighted connectivity vectorless map G = (V, E, D), the clustering data was achieved using a graph-theoretic minimal tree method. According to the main functional area planning, an optimal construction of each zoning district was proposed for spatial planning in county-level land. The research shows that: 1) The Pearson correlation coefficient of living function and production function was 0.343, whereas, that of production function and ecological function was -0.518. There was no significant correlation between living function and ecological function. 2) The high-value areas of living function were mainly distributed in an oblique "X" shape in the middle of Liaoning province, with low functional values on the east and west areas. There was no significant spatial autocorrelation of living function. The production function value presented a ring-shaped distribution in the center of Shenyang city, while decreased gradually from the center to the edge areas. In the production function, there was a positive and weak autocorrelation with high-high aggregation in the middle, while low-low aggregation in the east. High-value areas of ecological function were mostly distributed in the east and west areas, indicating the function value decreased gradually from the outside to the inside. In the ecological function, there was a positive and strong autocorrelation with high-high aggregation in the east, and a low-low aggregation in the middle. 3) According to the multifunctional features of land use, the study area was divided into, a) the east, the demonstration area of ecological function, b) the north, the function less coordination area, c) the south, the relatively balanced area, and d) the west, the function less development area. The east of Liaoning Province can be strengthened in the construction of public service facilities and economic development. Much attention can be paid to the development of inferior functions in the functional undercoordinated area of northern Liaoning, in order to achieve the goal of coordinated development. In the south of Liaoning, the spatial structure of land use can be optimized in the relatively balanced functional area, thereby to improve the land use function and competitiveness. In the west of Liaoning, the regional advantages can be enhanced in the underdeveloped functional areas, to gradually strengthen the function of land use.
  • [1] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Multifunctionality: Towards an analytical framework[M]. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Publications, 2001.
    [2] Pérez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, et al. Land use functions-a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability[M]//Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008: 375-404.
    [3] 黄安,许月卿,卢龙辉,等."生产-生活-生态"空间识别与优化研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(3):503-518.Huang An, Xu Yueqing, Lu Longhui, et al. Research progress of the identification and optimization of production- living-ecological spaces[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(3): 503-518. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [4] Kalantari Z, Santos Ferreira C S, Page J, et al. Meeting sustainable development challenges in growing cities: Coupled social-ecological systems modeling of land use and water changes[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 245: 471-480.
    [5] Xie Gaodi, Zhen Lin, Zhang Caixia, et al. Assessing the multifunctionalities of land use in China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2010, 1(4): 311-318.
    [6] 甄霖,曹淑艳,魏云洁,等. 土地空间多功能利用:理论框架及实证研究[J]. 资源科学,2009,31(4):544-551.Zhen Lin, Cao Shuyan, Wei Yunjie, et al. Land use functions: Conceptual framework and application for China[J]. Resources Science, 2009, 31(4): 544-551. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [7] Sulewski P, K?oczko-Gajewska A, Sroka W. Relations between agri-environmental, economic and social dimensions of farms' sustainability[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(12), 4629.
    [8] Van Broekhoven S, Vernay A L. Integrating functions for a sustainable urban system: A review of multifunctional land use and circular urban metabolism[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(6): 1875.
    [9] Godtman Kling K, Dahlberg A, Wall-Reinius S. Negotiating improved multifunctional landscape use: Trails as facilitators for collaboration among stakeholders[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(13): 3511.
    [10] Bretagnolle V, Berthet E, Gross N, et al. Towards sustainable and multifunctional agriculture in farmland landscapes: Lessons from the integrative approach of a French LTSER platform[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 627: 822-834.
    [11] Sieber S, Amjath-Babu T S, Reidsma P, et al. Sustainability impact assessment tools for land use policy advice: A comparative analysis of five research approaches[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 71: 75-85.
    [12] Stockdale A, Barker A. Sustainability and the multifunctional landscape: An assessment of approaches to planning and management in the Cairngorms National Park[J]. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26: 479-492.
    [13] 黄安,许月卿,郝晋珉,等. 土地利用多功能性评价研究进展与展望[J]. 中国土地科学,2017,31(4):88-97.Huang An, Xu Yueqing, Hao Jinmin, et al. Progress review on land use functions evaluation and its prospects[J]. China Land Sciences, 2017, 31(4): 88-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [14] 段建南,刘思涵,李萍,等. 土地功能研究进展与方向的思考[J]. 中国土地科学,2020,34(1):8-16.Duan Jiannan, Liu Sihan, Li Ping, et al. Study on research progress and directions of land functions[J]. China Land Sciences, 2020, 34(1): 8-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [15] 张路路,郑新奇,原智远,等. 基于全排列多边形综合图示法的唐山市土地利用多功能性评价[J]. 中国土地科学,2016,30(6):23-32.Zhang Lulu, Zheng Xinqi, Yuan Zhiyuan, et al. Assessment on multi-functionality of land use based on the entire-array-polygon indictor method in Tangshan[J]. China Land Sciences, 2016, 30(6): 23-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [16] 黄安,许月卿,刘超,等. 基于土地利用多功能性的县域乡村生活空间宜居性评价[J]. 农业工程学报,2018,34(8):252-261.Huang An, Xu Yueqing, Liu Chao, et al. Evaluation on livability of living space based on multiple functions of land use at county level[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2018, 34(8): 252-261. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [17] 戴文远,江方奇,黄万里,等. 基于"三生空间"的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究:以福州新区为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2018,33(12):2098-2109.Dai Wenyuan, Jiang Fangqi, Huang Wanli, et al. Study on transition of land use function and ecosystem service value based on the conception of production, living and ecological space: A case study of the Fuzhou new area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(12): 2098-2109. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [18] 张晓琳,金晓斌,范业婷,等. 1995-2015年江苏省土地利用功能转型特征及其协调性分析[J]. 自然资源学报,2019,34(4):689-706.Zhang Xiaolin, Jin Xiaobin, Fan Yeting, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics and coordination status of the land use function transition in Jiangsu province from 1995 to 2015[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(4): 689-706. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [19] 张一达,刘学录,范亚红,等. 甘肃省土地利用多功能性空间差异及影响因素分析[J]. 云南农业大学学报:自然科学,2019,34(3):544-552.Zhang Yida, Liu Xuelu, Fan Yahong, et al. The analysis of spatial difference and influencing factors on land use multifunctionality in Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University: Natural Science, 2019, 34(3): 544-552. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [20] 王枫,董玉祥. 广州市土地利用多功能的空间差异及影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学,2015,37(11):2179-2192.Wang Feng, Dong Yuxiang. Spatial differences and influencing factors of land use function in Guangzhou[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(11): 2179-2192. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [21] 张红梅,宋戈,王思琢. 基于"质量-产出-效率"的辽宁省耕地利用分区[J]. 农业工程学报,2019,35(13):234-242.Zhang Hongmei, Song Ge, Wang Sizhuo. Zoning of cultivated land use in Liaoning Province based on "quality-output-efficiency"[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(13): 234-242. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [22] 路昌,雷国平,周浩,等. 基于两维图论聚类法的东北地区土地利用分区研究[J]. 农业机械学报,2017,48(12):155-164.Lu Chang, Lei Guoping, Zhou Hao, et al. Land use zoning in Northeast China based on two-dimension graphics cluster methods[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(12): 155-164. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [23] 周浩,雷国平,杨雪昕,等. 基于两维图论的县域尺度耕地后备资源利用分区研究[J]. 农业机械学报,2017,48(6):116-124.Zhou Hao, Lei Guoping, Yang Xuexin, et al. Utilization zoning of reserve resources for cultivated land based on two-dimensional graph theory clustering method at county scale[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(6): 116-124. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [24] 杜国明,孙晓兵,王介勇. 东北地区土地利用多功能性演化的时空格局[J]. 地理科学进展,2016,35(2):232-244.Du Guoming, Sun Xiaobing, Wang Jieyong. Spatiotemporal patterns of multi-functionality of land use in Northeast China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(2): 232-244. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [25] 徐凯,房艳刚. 乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型识别:以辽宁省78个区县为例[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(3):482-495.Xu Kai, Fang Yangang. Spatial differentiation and type identification of rural territorial multi-functions in Liaoning Province[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 482-495. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [26] 信桂新,杨朝现,杨庆媛,等. 用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应[J]. 农业工程学报,2017,33(1):238-249.Xin Guixin, Yang Chaoxian, Yang Qingyuan, et al. Post-evaluation of well-facilitied capital farmland construction based on entropy weight method and improved TOPSIS model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2017, 33(1): 238-249. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [27] 王鹏,况福民,邓育武,等. 基于主成分分析的衡阳市土地生态安全评价[J]. 经济地理,2015,35(1):168-172.Wang Peng, Kuang Fumin, Deng Yuwu, et al. Assesment of land eco-security of the Hengyang City on the principal component[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(1): 168-172. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [28] 钱龙霞,张韧,王红瑞,等. 基于Logistic回归和DEA的水资源供需月风险评价模型及其应用[J]. 自然资源学报,2016,31(1):177-186.Qian Longxia, Zhang Ren, Wang Hongrui, et al. Monthly risk assesment model of water supply and demand based on logistic regression DEA and its application[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(1): 177-186. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [29] 唐启义. DPS数据处理系统:实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘(第二版)[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2010:719-743.
    [30] Mak K, Coulson M R C. Map-user response to computer-generated choropleth maps: Comparative experiments in classification and symbolization[J]. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 1991, 18(2): 109-124.
  • 期刊类型引用(12)

    1. 王乐,熊昌盛,田宇,周斌雄. 中国“三生”空间功能异质性评价、时空演变及分区调控. 农业工程学报. 2024(10): 265-275 . 本站查看
    2. 奉婷,余筱东,董仁玲. “两山”理论视角下县域“三生”功能评价与分区研究——以广西为例. 广西经济. 2024(02): 5-19 . 百度学术
    3. 阚瑶川,徐磊,郭宇,杨静园,孟凡迪,张长春. 土地利用多功能远程耦合特征及空间聚类分析——基于京津冀地区县域的SNA模型实证. 世界地理研究. 2024(09): 133-146 . 百度学术
    4. 杨柳,王晨颖,冯畅,李慧仪,彭璐璐,宣润泽. 考虑水系演变的湘江流域洪水风险四维评价体系构建. 农业工程学报. 2023(03): 92-101 . 本站查看
    5. 李伊彤,荣丽华. “三生”视角下牧区县域国土空间功能评价及分区优化——以锡林郭勒盟镶黄旗为例. 工业建筑. 2023(S1): 123-127 . 百度学术
    6. 宋复蓉,曾向阳. 基于两维图论聚类的矿粮复合区“三生”空间适宜性分区——以湖北省大冶市陈贵镇为例. 资源与产业. 2023(04): 55-66 . 百度学术
    7. 夏敏,刘岩,邹伟. “三生空间”相互作用视域下的南京市溧水区乡村宜居性评价. 农业工程学报. 2023(16): 245-255 . 本站查看
    8. 杨亚丽,王培俊,林子奇,范胜龙,刘旗,林晓岚. 安徽省“三生”功能空间特征及分区调控. 自然资源情报. 2023(12): 46-52 . 百度学术
    9. 吴宇斌,徐进才,郝润梅,王考,庞颖. 呼和浩特市国土空间功能评价及优化分区研究. 干旱区资源与环境. 2022(04): 56-63 . 百度学术
    10. 成筱溪,李效顺,和伟康,倪衡,赵子龙. 河南省县域土地利用适宜度空间格局特征及分区调控. 西南大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(11): 153-165 . 百度学术
    11. 张玉臻,陈阳,王洁,叶剑平,张蚌蚌. 黄河流域“三生”功能协调性测度及其差异性优化调控. 农业工程学报. 2021(12): 251-261+321 . 本站查看
    12. 孙进,张全景,王世清. 山东省县域土地利用多功能时空演变及影响因素. 资源开发与市场. 2021(11): 1309-1315 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(13)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  775
  • HTML全文浏览量:  5
  • PDF下载量:  313
  • 被引次数: 25
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-03-06
  • 修回日期:  2020-05-19
  • 发布日期:  2020-06-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回