湄公河流域生态系统服务与利益补偿机制

    Ecosystem services and benefit compensation mechanism in the Mekong River Basin

    • 摘要: 湄公河流域是中国"一带一路"沿线的重要门户,核算流域各国的生态系统服务价值(Ecosystem Service Value,ESV)与利益补偿量,对建立各国资源利用与经济补偿的联动关系、促进流域协调发展具有重要意义。基于生态足迹理论,对湄公河流域1995-2015年的ESV和生态盈余(或赤字)状况进行了动态评估,结合流域各国的实际经济发展水平对生态补偿优先级进行量化分析,初步建立了各国ESV与实际生态补偿量的转化关系,并对"生态消费型"国家在现状年(2015年)的实际生态补偿量进行了确定。结果表明:1)湄公河流域ESV由1995年的1 289.76亿美元下降至2015年的1 259.21亿美元,各国ESV从大到小依次为:泰国、老挝、柬埔寨、越南、缅甸;各国林地ESV的比重最大(>60.0%),水域和湿地ESV比重的增幅最快,近20 a增加了4.5%。2)1995-2015年间,流域境内的缅、老两国为生态盈余状态,其他3国为生态赤字状态,且赤字水平呈逐年加重趋势,其中泰、越两国对全流域生态足迹(Ecological Footprint,EF)的贡献比重高达80.1%。3)流域上游的缅、老两国为"生态输出型"国家,下游的3个国家为"生态消费型"国家,其中泰、越两国经济发展水平较好且生态补偿优先级系数(Ecological Compensation Priority Sequence,ECPS)更低(分别为0.05和0.09),均低于其他3个湄公河流域国家(缅甸:2.67,老挝:1.16,柬埔寨:0.55),应率先进行生态支付。4)结合流域各国的实际经济发展水平,初步确定下游"生态消费型"国家应支付实际生态补偿合计680.63亿美元,泰国、越南和柬埔寨分别支付507.73、167.61和5.29亿美元。该研究结果可为湄公河流域资源管理和生态补偿政策的建立提供理论支撑,并为其他跨境流域相关的研究提供借鉴与参考。

       

      Abstract: The Mekong river basin is bringing great economic and ecological values in the world, expecting to support the scheme of China’s Belt Road Initiative. Taking the sharing of Mekong River Basin as a case study, this study aims to calculate the Ecosystem Service Value (ESV) and compensation benefits for countries in the Mekong River Basin, in order to maintain the linkage between benefit sharing and economic compensation in Mekong River Basin. A biophysical approach based on the Ecological Footprint (EF) was used to measure the ESV and ecological surplus (or deficit) in the Mekong River Basin in 1995 and 2015. The relationship between ESV and actual compensatory payment for ecosystem services was initially investigated to quantitatively analyze the priority of ecological compensations. The results showed that: 1) The ESV decreased 3 billion dollars (from 128.976 to 125.921 billion dollars) during 1995-2015 in the Mekong River Basin. Specifically, Thailand presented the maximum ESV, followed by Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, and Myanmar. The qualitative assessment revealed that the highest levels of ESV were derived from forest in every country (>61.7%). There was a 4.5% increase in the ecosystem service that provided by water provisioning and wetlands in the past 20 years. 2) Myanmar and Laos were in the state of “ecological surplus”, while the other three countries were in the state of “ecological deficit”, indicating an increase deficit level. Thailand and Vietnam showed more than 80.1% of the total ecological footprint (EF) of the basin. 3) Myanmar and Laos were also the “ecological export” countries, whereas, the three countries in the lower reaches were the “ecological consumption” countries. Thailand and Vietnam can give a priority on the payment for ecosystem services because of its better economic outcomes and lower Ecological Compensation Priority Sequence (ECPS) values of 0.05 and 0.09, respectively, indicating that lower than the other three countries in the Mekong River Basin (Myanmar: 2.67, Laos: 1.16, Cambodia: 0.55). 4) In the course of economic growth of the countries in Mekong River Basin, the total ecological compensation required 68.063 billion dollars from the “ecological consumption” countries in the lower reaches. Thailand, Vietnam, and Cambodia can be required 50.773, 16.761 and 0.529 billion dollars, respectively. This finding can provide a theoretical support to establish the policies for resource management and compensatory payment in the Mekong River Basin and other transboundary river basins.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回