孙道宗, 占旭锐, 刘伟康, 薛秀云, 谢家兴, 李震, 宋淑然, 王卫星. 侧风影响下喷头倾斜角度对雾滴飘移补偿[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(21): 80-89. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.21.010
    引用本文: 孙道宗, 占旭锐, 刘伟康, 薛秀云, 谢家兴, 李震, 宋淑然, 王卫星. 侧风影响下喷头倾斜角度对雾滴飘移补偿[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(21): 80-89. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.21.010
    Sun Daozong, Zhan Xurui, Liu Weikang, Xue Xiuyun, Xie Jiaxing, Li Zhen, Song Shuran, Wang Weixing. Compensation of spray angle to droplet drift under crosswind[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2021, 37(21): 80-89. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.21.010
    Citation: Sun Daozong, Zhan Xurui, Liu Weikang, Xue Xiuyun, Xie Jiaxing, Li Zhen, Song Shuran, Wang Weixing. Compensation of spray angle to droplet drift under crosswind[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2021, 37(21): 80-89. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.21.010

    侧风影响下喷头倾斜角度对雾滴飘移补偿

    Compensation of spray angle to droplet drift under crosswind

    • 摘要: 为研究植保喷雾作业中在不同风速和喷头倾斜角度下对水平喷雾的雾滴飘移的影响,设置3个风速水平(1、2、3 m/s)与4个喷头倾斜角度水平(0°、15°、30°、45°)进行喷雾试验,测定了不同水平的雾滴分布,以风速为0、喷头倾斜角度为0°的常规作业水平作为对照组,对垂直和水平两个方向的雾滴质量分布中心与变异系数进行分析。结果表明,垂直方向上,侧风风速与喷头倾斜角度对垂直雾滴质量分布中心的影响在±3 cm范围内整体影响较小,而侧风风速与喷头倾斜角度的增大都会使垂直方向变异系数减小,在1~3 m/s的风速下垂直方向变异系数减小的最大值分别为12.3、6.0、16.0个百分点,提高了雾滴在垂直方向上的均匀性。水平方向上,不同风速和喷头倾斜角度都会对雾滴飘移产生影响,随着喷头倾斜角度的增大,雾滴受风速的影响程度会减小,当喷头倾斜角的补偿量超过了当前风速下对雾滴的飘移量,会使雾滴飘移产生过补偿,在高风速时喷头倾斜角度的改变会带来更大的雾滴飘移改变。侧风风速与喷头倾斜角度对水平方向上变异系数会产生较大影响:随着喷头倾斜角度的增大,水平变异系数也随之增大,而风速的变化使水平变异系数呈现先增大后减小的趋势。拟合了喷头倾斜角度与风速对雾滴飘移的影响模型,并计算出在1、2、3 m/s风速条件下,最佳补偿的喷头倾斜角度分别为3°、7°、11°。该研究为植保作业中雾滴飘移改善技术提供参考。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: This study aims to explore the effects of side spray in the plant protection spraying on the droplet drift under different wind speeds and nozzle tilt angles. A sprayed test was performed on the three wind speed levels (1, 2, and 3 m/s), and four nozzle tilt angles (0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°). The droplet distribution was also measured under different levels. The control group was also set as a wind speed of 0 m/s, and the nozzle tilt angle of 0°. The mass distribution center of droplet and the coefficient of variation were then determined in the vertical and horizontal directions. The results show that there was a relatively small influence of crosswind wind speed and nozzle tilt angle on the droplet mass distribution center in the range of ±3 cm in the vertical direction. Specifically, the increase of crosswind wind speed and nozzle tilt angle caused the new variation in the vertical direction. The maximum decrease of coefficient of variation in vertical direction at 1-3 m/s wind speed is 12.3, 6.0 and 16.0 percentage points respectively. By contrast, there was a greatly different influence of the wind speeds and nozzle tilt angles on the droplet drift in the horizontal direction. The influence of the fog droplets on the wind speed decreased, as the tilt angle of the nozzle increased toward the negative direction of the wind speed. The fog droplets drifted excessively, when the compensation amount of the nozzle tilt angle exceeded the drift amount of the fog droplets under the current wind speed. The tilt angle of the nozzle at high wind speeds was greatly contributed to a greater change in the droplet drift. The speed of crosswind wind and the tilt angle of the nozzle presented a greater impact on the coefficient of variation in the horizontal direction. Furthermore, the horizontal coefficient of variation increased, whereas, the change of wind speed caused the horizontal coefficient of variation to increase first and then decrease, as the tilt angle of the nozzle increased. Consequently, the best compensated nozzle tilt angles were 3°, 7° and 11° under the conditions of 1, 2, and 3 m/s. This finding can provide a strong reference for the improvement technology of droplet drift in plant protection spraying.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回