• EI
    • CSA
    • CABI
    • 卓越期刊
    • CA
    • Scopus
    • CSCD
    • 核心期刊

基于不同农业经营主体的农业绿色生产机械购置行为

张兆同, 熊燕华, 李颖卓, 彭露

张兆同, 熊燕华, 李颖卓, 彭露. 基于不同农业经营主体的农业绿色生产机械购置行为[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(24): 46-55. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.24.006
引用本文: 张兆同, 熊燕华, 李颖卓, 彭露. 基于不同农业经营主体的农业绿色生产机械购置行为[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(24): 46-55. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.24.006
Zhang Zhaotong, Xiong Yanhua, Li Yingzhuo, Peng Lu. Purchase behavior of agricultural green production machinery based on different agricultural operation entities[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2021, 37(24): 46-55. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.24.006
Citation: Zhang Zhaotong, Xiong Yanhua, Li Yingzhuo, Peng Lu. Purchase behavior of agricultural green production machinery based on different agricultural operation entities[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2021, 37(24): 46-55. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.24.006

基于不同农业经营主体的农业绿色生产机械购置行为

基金项目: 国家社科基金一般项目(20BGL168)

Purchase behavior of agricultural green production machinery based on different agricultural operation entities

  • 摘要: 农业绿色生产是农业绿色发展的重要内容,而绿色生产机械的购置与运用是农业绿色生产的关键,基于不同农业经营主体的农业绿色生产机械购置行为研究,有助于提升相关政策的有效性和针对性。该研究基于计划行为理论,提出了理论假设,构建了结构方程模型,通过社会调查获得数据,运用AMOS软件,对模型进行了检验,对假设进行了验证。计算结果显示,"行为态度"、"主观规范"、"知觉行为控制"3个潜变量和"购置意愿"潜变量之间的路径系数分别为-0.208、0.5、0.434,"购置意愿"和"购置行为"之间的路径系数为0.693,"身份"、"经营规模"个体特征变量和"购置意愿"之间的路径系数分别为0.146、0.053。研究认为,农业经营主体购置农业绿色生产机械的行为意愿受主观规范影响最大;感知行为控制的影响次之,行为态度和购置意愿关系失调。购置意愿和购置行为呈显著正向关系。农业经营主体的个性特征对购置意愿的影响存在差异,其中,身份和经营规模显著影响购置意愿,文化程度和年龄对购置意愿的影响不显著。因此,应培育农业绿色生产机械购置与使用主体,强化绿色生产宣传和典型示范,完善绿色生态导向的补贴政策,形成绿色生产机械有效需求和有效供给,推动绿色生产机械的购置与使用,助力农业绿色发展。
    Abstract: Abstract: Green development has been a pressing requirement to the practical need of agricultural development in the national strategy. Green production machinery has also been one of the most important parts of agricultural green development. Therefore, the purchase and application of green production machinery have become a realistic activity in modern agriculture in recent years. However, there was an outstandingly insufficient matching between the purchase and use of agricultural green production machinery in practice. It is thus necessary to explore the purchase intention and behavior of agricultural operation entities, thereby promoting the application of green production machinery. Particularly, the existing research was mostly focused on the purchase of traditional agricultural machinery, rather than green production machinery. In this study, a theoretical framework was constructed to determine the purchase intention and behavior of green production machinery using different agricultural operation entities, according to the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Six theoretical hypotheses were also proposed in terms of the relationships between the purchase intention and the personality characteristics of agricultural operation entities, attitude toward behavior, subjective norms, perceived behavior control, as well as the relationship between purchase intention and purchase behavior. A structural equation was then established for the purchase behavior of green production machinery. Several economically developed regions in Jiangsu Province of China were selected as sample areas, and the social survey data was collected by means of questionnaire distribution, symposium, and household survey. The reliability and validity of the model were verified, as well as the theoretical hypotheses using AMOS software. The results support five hypotheses, but one hypothesis was rejected, namely, the relationship between attitude toward behavior and purchase intention. Among them, the intention of agricultural operation entities to purchase agricultural green production machinery was most affected by subjective norms, where the path coefficient was 0.5. The Followed was the perceived behavior control, where the path coefficient was 0.434. It was found that the relationship between the attitude toward behavior and purchase intention was maladjusted as a path coefficient of -0.208. There was a significant positive relationship between purchase intention and purchase behavior, where the path coefficient was 0.693. All the relationships above passed the 1% significance test. In addition, the personality characteristics of agricultural operation entities presented the different effects on the purchase intention. Specifically, the identity and operation scale presented a significant but small effect on the purchase intention, which were 0.146 and 0.053, respectively. The education level and age showed no significant effect on the purchase intention. Consequently, the theoretical framework and structural equation can be widely expected to explain the characteristics and influential factors of purchase behavior for the green production machinery in the agricultural operators. Some suggestions were also made to further strengthen the publicity of green production in a social atmosphere of green production, in order to guide the restrictive role of social norms. More importantly, it is necessary to improve the subsidy policy and guidance for the purchase of agricultural machinery, to encourage large-scale land operation, and to enhance the actual demand of agricultural production and operation entities for purchasing green production machinery. Moreover, it also requires the R & D capacity of manufacturers and the effective supply of agricultural green production machinery. The final goal is to achieve more and better use of agricultural green production machinery.
  • [1] 罗锡文,廖娟,胡炼,等. 提高农业机械化水平促进农业可持续发展[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(1): 1-11.Luo Xiwen, Liao Juan, Hu Lian, et al. Improving agricultural mechanization level to promote agricultural sustainable development[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(1): 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [2] 刘慧. 解决低端产能过剩,新技术、新产品供给不足等难题:农机补贴新规支撑农业绿色发展[N]. 经济日报,2019-03-27.
    [3] Ji Y Q, Yu X H, Zhong F N. Machinery investment decision and off-farm employment in rural China[J]. China Economic Review, 2011, 23(1): 71-80.
    [4] Muller M. Leadership in agricultural machinery circles: experimental evidence from Tajikistan[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2020, 64(2): 533-554.
    [5] 张标,张领先,傅泽田,等. 农户农机需求及购买行为分析:基于18省的微观调查数据实证[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2017,22(11):208-223.Zhang Biao, Zhang Lingxian, Fu Zetian, et al. Analysis on farmers' requirement for agricultural machinery and purchasing behavior: Based on the survey data of 18 provinces[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2017, 22(11): 208-223. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [6] 曹光乔,周力,易中懿,等. 农业机械购置补贴对农户购机行为的影响:基于江苏省水稻种植业的实证分析[J].中国农村经济,2010,(6): 38-48.
    [7] 王许沁,张宗毅,葛继红. 农机购置补贴政策、效果与效率:基于激励效应与挤出效应视角[J]. 中国农村观察,2018(2):60-74.Wang Xuqin, Zhang Zongyi, Ge Jihong. The effects and efficiency of agricultural machinery purchase subsidies: From the perspective of incentive effect and crowding-out effect[J]. China Rural Survey, 2018(2): 60-74. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [8] 冷博峰,冯中朝,周晓时,等. 农机购置补贴对农户购机投入模型与影响分析[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(23):324-334.Leng Bofeng, Feng Zhongchao, Zhou Xiaoshi, et al. Modeling and analysis of the effects of agricultural machinery purchase subsidies on farmers' agricultural machinery investment[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(23): 324-334. (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [9] 路玉彬,周振,张祚本,等. 改革开放40年农业机械化发展与制度变迁[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:社会科学版,2018,18(6):18-25.Lu Yubin, Zhou Zhen, Zhang Zuoben, et al. Institutional change during development process of agricultural mechanization in 40 years of reform and opening up in China[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University: Social Science Edition, 2018, 18(6): 18-25. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [10] 张露,罗必良. 小农生产如何融入现代农业发展轨道:来自中国小麦主产区的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(12): 144-160.Zhang Lu, Luo Biliang. How can small farmers be incorporated into modern agricultural development? Evidence from wheat: producing areas of China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2018, 53(12): 144-160. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [11] Sok J, Borges J R, Schmidt P, et al. Farmer behaviour as reasoned action: A critical review of research with the theory of planned behaviour[J]. Journal of Agriculture Economics, 2021, 72(2): 388-412.
    [12] Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.
    [13] Genovaite L, Renta D, Romualdas G. The determinants of renewable energy usage intentions using theory of planned behavior approach[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 170: 587-594.
    [14] Damalas C A. Farmers' intention to reduce pesticide use: the role of perceived risk of loss in the model of the planned behavior theory[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2021, 28(26): 35278-35285.
    [15] 杨志海. 老龄化、社会网络与农户绿色生产技术采纳行为:来自长江流域六省农户数据的验证[J]. 中国农村观察,2018(4):44-58.Yang Zhihai. Aging, social network and the adoption of green production technology: Evidence from farm households in six provinces in the Yangtze River basin[J]. China Rural Survey, 2018(4): 44-58. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [16] 张高亮,张璐璐,邱咸,等. 基于计划行为理论的渔民参与专业合作组织行为的产生机理[J]. 农业经济问题,2015,36(8): 97-104.
    [17] Warner L A, Diaz J M, Silvert C, et al. Predicting intentions to engage in a suite of yard fertilizer behaviors: integrated insights from the diffusion of innovations, theory of planned behavior, and contextual factors[J]. Society & Natural Resources, 2021, 34(3): 373-392.
    [18] 俞振宁,谭永忠,练款,等. 基于计划行为理论分析农户参与重金属污染耕地休耕治理行为[J]. 农业工程学报,2018,34(24):266-273.Yu Zhenning, Tan Yongzhong, Lian Kuan, et al. Analysis on fallow governance behavior of farmers in heavy metal polluted region based on theory of planned behavior[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2018, 34(24): 266-273. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [19] Wang Y D, Liang J P, Yang J, et al. Analysis of the environmental behavior of farmers for non-point source pollution control and management: an integration of the theory of planned behavior and the protection motivation theory[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 237: 15-23.
    [20] 刘伟,童洪志,丁卡尼. BOP战略背景下影响农机扩散的政府补贴因素分析:基于多Agent建模的仿真研究[J].管理评论,2017,29(7):200-212.Liu Wei, Tong Hongzhi, Ding Kani. Analysis of governmental subsidy factors influencing agri-machinery diffusion under the background of BOP strategy: Simulation research based on multi-agent modeling[J]. Management Review, 2017, 29(7): 200-212. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [21] 黄祖辉,钟颖琦,王晓莉. 不同政策对农户农药施用行为的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(8):148-155.Huang Zuhui, Zhong Yingqi, Wang Xiaoli. Study on the impacts of government policy on farmers' pesticide application behavior[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(8): 148-155. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [22] Paudel G P, Bahadur K C D, Rahut D B, et al. Smallholder farmers' willingness to pay for scale-appropriate farm mechanization: evidence from the mid-hills of Nepal[J]. Technology in Society, 2019, 59: 1-10.
    [23] 王文信,徐云,王正大. 农机购置补贴对农户购机行为的影响[J]. 农业机械学报,2020,51(5):151-155.Wang Wenxin, Xu Yun, Wang Zhengda. The influence of agricultural machinery purchase subsidies on farmers' purchase behavior[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(5): 151-155. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [24] Liang L, Ridoutt B G, Lal R, et al. Nitrogen footprint and nitrogen use efficiency of greenhouse tomato production in North China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 208: 285-296.
    [25] Davis G W, Bailey D, Chudoba K M. Defining and meeting the demand for agricultural machinery in China: A case study of John Deere[J]. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2010, 13(3): 97-120.
    [26] Diao X S, Cossar F, Houssou N, et al. Mechanization in Ghana: emerging demand, and the search for alternative supply models[J]. Food Policy, 2014, 48: 168-181.
    [27] 曹海英. 消费者绿色购买行为影响因素的实证分析[J]. 统计与决策,2018,34(14):112-114.
    [28] Cialdini R B, Kallgren C A, Reno R R. A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1991, 24(1): 201-234.
    [29] Mohr S, Kühl R. Acceptance of artificial intelligence in German agriculture: An application of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior[J]. Precision Agriculture,2021, 22(6): 1-29.
    [30] 李宁,汪险生,王舒娟,等. 自购还是外包:农地确权如何影响农户的农业机械化选择?[J]. 中国农村经济,2019(6):54-75.Li Ning, Wang Xiansheng, Wang Shujuan, et al. Self purchase or outsourcing: how does farmland right confirmation affect farmers' choice of agricultural mechanization?[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(6): 54-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [31] Safa L, Saghinsara V M. Understanding rural people's engagement in pro-environmental behaviors: An integrated conceptual framework[J]. Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology, 2020, 22(5): 1205-1217.
    [32] 许秀川,李容,李国珍. 小规模经营与农户农机服务需求:一个两阶段决策模型的考察[J], 农业技术经济,2017(9):45-57.
    [33] 陈新建,黄嘉升. 生产风险、风险规避与农户农业生产机械投资:购买机械还是购买服务?[J]. 农业现代化研究,2020,41(5):803-812.Chen Xinjian, Huang Jiasheng. Production risk, risk aversion and farmers' agricultural machinery investment choice: Buy machinery or buy services?[J]. Research on Agricultural Modernization, 2020, 41(5): 803-812. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [34] Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach[Z]. New York: Psychology Press, 2010.
    [35] 王春晓,陈姝彤,徐坤. 研究生科学数据共享态度与共享意愿关系研究[J]. 情报科学,2020,38(12):78-84.Wang Chunxiao, Chen Shutong, Xu Kun. The relationship between postgraduates' attitude and willingness to share scientific data[J]. Information Science, 2020, 38(12): 78-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [36] 陈劼绮,李桂莎,陆林. 旅游纪念品:买还是不买?基于矛盾态度理论的消费者购买意愿研究[J]. 旅游科学,2021,35(4):108-127.Chen Jieqi, Li Guisha, Lu Lin. Souvenirs: To buy or not to buy? A study on consumers' purchase intention based on the theory of ambivalent attitude[J]. Tourism Science, 2021, 35(4): 108-127. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [37] 畅倩,颜俨,李晓平,等. 为何"说一套做一套":农户生态生产意愿与行为的悖离研究[J]. 农业技术经济,2021(4):85-97.Chang Qian, Yan Yan, Li Xiaoping, et al. Why "say one thing and do another": A study on the deviation of willingness and behavior of farmers' ecological production[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2021(4): 85-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  469
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  721
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-07-08
  • 修回日期:  2021-11-30
  • 发布日期:  2021-12-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回