方会敏, 牛萌萌, 薛新宇, 姬长英. 玉米田间机械-化学协同除草的杂草防除效果[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(6): 44-51. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.06.005
    引用本文: 方会敏, 牛萌萌, 薛新宇, 姬长英. 玉米田间机械-化学协同除草的杂草防除效果[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(6): 44-51. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.06.005
    Fang Huimin, Niu Mengmeng, Xue Xinyu, Ji Changying. Effects of mechanical-chemical synergistic weeding on weed control in maize field[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(6): 44-51. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.06.005
    Citation: Fang Huimin, Niu Mengmeng, Xue Xinyu, Ji Changying. Effects of mechanical-chemical synergistic weeding on weed control in maize field[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(6): 44-51. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.06.005

    玉米田间机械-化学协同除草的杂草防除效果

    Effects of mechanical-chemical synergistic weeding on weed control in maize field

    • 摘要: 施用除草剂和机械除草是目前杂草控制的两种主要手段,受农田环境、机具作业能力等限制,单一机械或化学防治均存在一定的局限性。该研究以玉米田为研究对象,设置机械除草协同减量化学除草策略,选取2种机械除草方式(行间与株间)和3种化学减量比例(减量25%、50%、75%)及2种化学施药方式(全幅和苗行)组合进行除草试验。从除草效果和玉米生长方面综合研究了机械-化学协同除草方式的杂草防除效果。试验结果表明:机械除草方式能够疏松土壤,使除草区域的土壤紧实度降低64.4%以上。除草处理后2周,行间机械除草的株防效为83.4%,优于株间机械除草的株防效46.7%;玉米吐丝期,机械-化学协同处理的除草效果优于单一机械除草,行间机械除草协同除草剂减施处理的除草效果优于同水平施药量下的株间机械除草协同除草剂减施处理;无论是在吐丝期还是成熟期,机械-化学协同除草处理的玉米叶面积和干物质量大于单一机械除草或化学除草,机械-化学协同除草模式可促进植株营养元素累积和作物生长;行间机械-化学协同除草处理的平均产量分别高出单一机械和化学除草模式29.0%和20.4%,株间机械-化学协同除草处理的平均产量分别高出单一机械和化学除草模式55.9%和5.1%;从玉米产量及其构成来看,机械除草协同除草剂减施25%处理的增产效果最优,该处理下的千粒质量和产量均高于其他协同处理。该研究明确了机械-化学协同除草策略对农田杂草防除和作物生长的影响,机械协同除草剂减施处理能在不降低除草效果的前提下减少除草剂施用和增加玉米产量。该研究为杂草绿色防控提供了新思路,研究结果可为玉米田除草剂减施提供参考。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: Weed control has been the agricultural component of pest control, in order to reduce the presence of weeds on a farm. Weeds generally compete with the crops for the nutrients and water, leading to a parasitic environment for the pests and diseases, thus directly detrimental to the crop yield and quality. Herbicide application and mechanical weeding are two current means of weed control in China. However, the mechanical weeding cannot completely break the agglomeration of weed roots in the soil, whereas, the herbicides cannot evenly and fully be deposited on weeds, due to the limitations of the field environment and machine operation capacity. It is a high demand for the higher performance of weed control with less environmental pollution, according to the current national standard of "chemicals reduction and efficiency enhancement" and "weed control environment-friendly". One individual improvement in weeding machinery or chemicals cannot balance the harsh requirement of weed control in modern agriculture. Taking the maize field as the research object, the mechanical-chemical synergistic weeding strategy was proposed to determine the efficacy of weeding control during the growth period. A synergistic weeding experiment was also carried out using two mechanical weeding approaches (inter- and intra-row weeding), three chemical reduction ratios (25%, 50%, and 75%), and two chemical applications (full width and only rows). Some parameters were measured, including the conventional weeding index, such as the control efficacy, and the growth indexes of maize at the silking and mature period. The results showed that the improved mechanical weeding significantly reduced the soil compactness of the weeding area by more than 64.4% than before, indicating the loose soil in the maize field. The control efficiency of the weed plant was 83.4% under the inter-row weeding machinery after two-week treatment, which was better than that under the intra-row weeding machinery (46.7%). The weed status in the silking period of maize showed that the efficacy of the inter-row weeding with the herbicide reduction was better than that of the intra-row weeding with herbicide reduction, while, the weeding efficacy of mechanical-chemical synergistic treatment was better than that of single mechanical weeding. The leaf area and dry matter weight of maize under the mechanical-chemical synergistic weeding treatment were greater than those under the single mechanical or chemical weeding treatment. It infers that the mechanical-chemical synergistic treatment was conducive to the accumulation of plant nutrients for the better promotion of crop growth. Furthermore, the average yields of intra-row mechanical-chemical synergistic weeding treatment were 55.9% and 5.1% higher than those of single mechanical and chemical ones, respectively, while, those of inter-row one were only 29.0% and 20.4% higher. The best yield of maize was achieved under the synergistic treatment of mechanical weeding and herbicide application reduction of 25%, where the 1 000 grain weight and yield were higher than the rest. In the inter-row mechanical weeding, the 1 000 grain weight and yield were the highest under the full-width application of 75% herbicide amount and mechanical-chemical synergistic treatment. In the intra-row mechanical weeding, the grain number per ear, 1000 grain weight and yield were the highest under only the row application of 75% herbicide amount and mechanical-chemical synergistic treatment. Therefore, the mechanical weeding synergized with the chemical reduction strategy can be widely expected to reduce the number of chemical herbicides without the loss of weeding efficacy for the high yield of maize. This finding can provide a new approach for herbicide reduction and weed control in an environmentally friendly way in the maize field.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回