基于产量-品质-碳排放的加工番茄适宜水肥气滴灌耦合模式

    Suitable water-fertilizer-gas-drip irrigation coupling model for processing tomato based on yield quality and carbon emission

    • 摘要: 为探究基于腐植酸施加和微纳米加气的水肥气耦合滴灌模式对加工番茄产量、品质和CO2排放量的影响,于2023年在新疆石河子市石河子大学现代节水灌溉重点实验室开展田间试验,采用灌水量、腐植酸添加量和加气方式三因素完全随机试验,设置3 800 m3/hm2(W1)和4 500 m3/hm2(W2)2个灌水水平,0(H0)、0.25%(H1)和0.5%(H2)3个腐植酸添加水平,常规膜下滴灌(A0,对照)和微纳米加气滴灌(A1)2种加气方式,研究水肥气耦合对加工番茄产量、品质、温室气体排放和净利润的影响。结果表明,W2处理下CO2累积排放通量和净固碳量较W1处理分别显著增大17.14%和25.36%;H2处理较H1处理两者分别显著增大12.23%和12.26%,较H0处理分别显著增大24.59%和25.18%;H1处理较H0分别显著增大11.02%和12.66%(P<0.05);A1处理各指标较A0各指标分别显著增大12.28%和12.64%。相比于A0处理,A1处理能显著提高加工番茄整体产量、品质及灌溉水分利用效率(P<0.05),但对加工番茄结果数影响不显著(P>0.05)。通过优劣解距离法、秩和比法和主成分分析3种评价方法,从产量指标、品质指标、经济效益指标和环境指标(碳排碳固)4个方面选取12个评价指标进行综合评价,结论表明,3 800 m3/hm2的灌水水平与0.5%的腐植酸施加量和微纳米加气的耦合滴灌模式综合评价综合得分最高,建议作为加工番茄高产-优质-减排-增效的最优水肥气耦合模式。研究可为北疆干旱区滴灌加工番茄高产优质减排生产提供理论依据和技术支撑。

       

      Abstract: In order to investigate the effects of water-fertilizer-gas coupled drip irrigation on processing tomato yield, quality and CO2 emissions from processing tomato land, and to screen out better treatments that take into account high yield and quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve economic efficiency. This study was conducted in a 4-month field trial in 2023 at the Key Laboratory of Modern Water-saving Irrigation, Shihezi University, Shihezi City, Xinjiang. This experiment was a three-factor completely randomised trial using irrigation level, humic acid addition and aerating method, and the local conventional irrigation level was 4500 m3/hm2 , so the irrigation level was set at 4500 m3/hm2 (W2) and 3800 m3/hm2 (W1), humic acid addition was set at three levels, 0% (H0), 0.25% (H1) and 0.5% (H2), and the aerating method was conventional sub-film drip (A0) and micro-nano aerated drip (A1), to study the effects of water-fertilizer-gas coupling on the yield, quality, GHG emissions, and net profit of processing tomatoes. The results showed that, in terms of carbon emission and carbon sequestration, the cumulative CO2 emission flux, initial carbon productivity and net carbon sequestration under W2 treatment were significantly increased by 17.14%, 23.91% and 25.36%, respectively, compared with W1 treatment; and the indicators of each index under H2 treatment were significantly increased by 12.23%, 11.48%, and 12.26%, respectively, compared with H1 treatment, and by 24.59%, 26.47%, 25.18%, 24.59%, 24.59%, 26.47%, and 25.18%, respectively, compared with H0 treatment, 26.47% and 25.18%, respectively; H1 treatment was significantly larger than H0 by 11.02%, 12.29% and 12.66%, respectively; and the indicators of A1 treatment were significantly larger than those of A0 by 12.28%, 13.02% and 12.64%, respectively. In terms of yield quality, processing tomato yield, number of fruits, quality of single fruit and IWUE were significantly increased by 19.87%, 9.98%, 8.86% and 17.30% (P<0.05) in the W2 treatment compared to the W1 treatment, but vitamin C, soluble sugar, titratable acid, soluble solids, and lycopene content of processing tomatoes were significantly reduced by 14.58%, 7.99%, 10.18%, 4.77%, and 12.89% (P<0.05).Tomato yield, number of fruits, quality of single fruit, IWUE, vitamin C, soluble sugar, soluble solids, and lycopene were increased by 15.86%, 5.25%, 10.59%, and 15.63%, 29.32%, and 10.91%, respectively, in H2 treatment compared with H0 treatment, 6.92%, 26.03% (P<0.05).Tomato yield, number of fruits, quality of single fruit, IWUE, and vitamin C were significantly improved in H2 treatment compared to H1 treatment by 9.10%, 4.19%, 4.71%, 8.95%, and 9.89%, respectively (P<0.05). However, it is noteworthy that titratable acid content was significantly reduced by 11.21% (P<0.05) in H2 treatment as compared to H0 treatment.Tomato yield, single fruit mass, IWUE, vitamin C, soluble sugar, soluble solids, and lycopene were increased by 29.76%, 15.23%, 29.76%, 35.65%, and 22.28%, respectively, in A1 treatment as compared to A0 treatment, 10.50%, and 41.95% (P<0.05). By means of three evaluation methods, namely the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) method, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), 12 evaluation indicators were selected for a comprehensive evaluation from four aspects: yield indicators, quality indicators, economic benefit indicators, and environmental indicators (carbon emissions and carbon sequestration). The conclusion indicates that the coupling drip irrigation mode combining an irrigation level of 3,800 m³/hm², an application rate of 0.5% humic acid, and micro-nano aeration achieved the highest comprehensive evaluation score. It is recommended as the optimal water-fertilizer-gas coupling mode for high-yield, high-quality, emission reduction, and efficiency enhancement of processing tomatoes. This research can provide theoretical basis and technical support for the high-yield, high-quality, and emission reduction production of drip-irrigated processing tomatoes in the arid area of northern Xinjiang.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回