基于四象限法的江西省南丰县耕林园置换潜力测算

    Potential calculation of farmland replacement of rarmland with forests and gardens in Nanfeng County, Jiangxi Province using the four quadrant method

    • 摘要: 针对以“山下园林地、山上耕地”为典型的农用地土地资源错配问题,推进耕林园置换、优化农用地空间布局,对于促进耕地保护、实现农用地可持续利用具有重要意义,而科学测算耕林园置换潜力是根本基础。该研究以江西省耕地“山上换山下”试点南丰县为例,从土地质量、地理区位、生态条件、空间形态4个方面构建宜耕性评价指标体系,并运用四象限法,以坡度和宜耕性为主导因素进行潜力测算。结果表明:1)评价区域内耕地适宜性总体良好,但局部耕地适宜性水平较低;评价区域内林地宜耕性相对较差,宜耕性Ⅳ级、Ⅴ级林地占评价面积的65.39%;评价区域内园地宜耕性相对较好,宜耕性Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级园地占评价面积的84.73%。2)宜置换为耕地的潜力和宜置换为林地的潜力分别为15437.86 hm2和778.91 hm2,在数量上分布不均衡。3)置换潜力表现出明显的空间分异特征。其中,宜置换为耕地的潜力主要分布在桑田镇、白舍镇、莱溪乡等地,主要集中在中部河谷平原;宜置换为林地的潜力主要分布在傅坊乡、三溪乡、太和镇和紫霄镇等丘陵山区,整体上东西多,中部少。4)建议基于不同的地类调整情形,在因地制宜和稳慎推进的前提下,制定差别化的推进策略。研究结果可为农用地布局优化提供依据。

       

      Abstract: The use of land is the fundamental requirement of the rational use of land by local conditions. Given the mismatch of agricultural land resources, which is typified by the problem of garden land under the mountain and farmland on the hill, the promotion of the replacement of farmland with forests and gardens and the optimization of the spatial distribution of agricultural land is of great significance for the promotion of arable land preservation and sustainable use of farmland, and the scientific calculation of the potential of replacement of farmland with forests is the fundamental basis for this. The study takes Nanfeng County, Jiangxi Province as an example, and constructs a system of evaluation indexes of arable land suitability from four aspects: land quality, geographical location, ecological conditions, and spatial pattern, and uses the four-quadrant method to measure the potential with slope and arable land suitability as the dominant factors. The results show that: 1) The suitability of farmland in the evaluation area is generally good, but the suitability level of local farmland is low, which makes it difficult to realize the best use of land; the arable nature of forests in the evaluation area is relatively poor, with the arable nature of Class IV and Class V forests accounting for 65.39 per cent of the evaluation area; the arable nature of fields in the evaluation area is relatively good, with the arable nature of Class Ⅰ, Class Ⅱ and Class Ⅲ fields accounting for 84.73 per cent of the evaluation area; and the conditions of agricultural production are favorable, but some of the fields have poor arable land, which makes it difficult to develop and utilize them. 2) The potential for replacement with farmland and the potential for replacement with forest are unevenly distributed. Specifically, the potential for replacement with farmland total of 15,437.86 hm2, of which 6,548.17 hm2 was forest land under the mountain and 8,889.69 hm2 was field under the hill; The total potential of forest land to be replaced is 778.91 hm2, of which 69.70 hm2 is farmland on the‘mountain’and 709.21 hm2 is garden land on the‘mountain’to be adjusted. 3) The replacement potential shows obvious spatial differentiation. Among them, the potential suitability for replacement with farmland is mainly distributed in Sangtian Township, Baishe Township and Laixi Township, which are mainly concentrated in the central Valley plain; the potential suitability for replacement with the forest is mainly distributed in the hilly and mountainous areas of Fufang Township, Sanshi Township, Taihe Township and Zixiao Township, which are more in east and west and less in the center as a whole. 4) It is recommended that differentiated promotion strategies be formulated based on different land-type adjustment scenarios, on the premise of adapting to local conditions and prudent promotion. This study differs from the past potential measurement based on suitability evaluation by constructing a potential identification mechanism for farmland, forest and field replacement that combines slope and farm ability, identifying the mismatch space of farmland, forest and field through slope, and screening replacement plots based on the results of farm ability evaluation, which can effectively clarify the direction, potential and path of optimizing the layout of agricultural land. However, this identification mechanism assesses the replacement potential of farmland, forests, and fields on a broader scale, necessitating further verification through field surveys and explorations. Additionally, the conversion of farmland into forests and gardens encounters various challenges, including inadequate policy support, conflicts over land ownership, unequal distribution of benefits, and low willingness among farmers. Relying solely on theoretical assessments of potential makes it difficult to achieve optimal adjustments in the layout of agricultural land.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回