微型指数振子低频超声雾化喷头的研制及喷雾试验

    Development and spray test of micro index low-frequency ultrasonic nozzle

    • 摘要: 针对现有低频超声雾化喷头存在驱动电压高、工作效率低、电路和喷头发热严重以及体积较大等缺点,该文研制了一种工作频率为60kHz的微型指数振子超声雾化喷头及喷头的驱动电路。根据频率方程确定了喷头的基本尺寸,建立了喷头的有限单元模型,根据该模型进行了喷头的模态分析和谐响应分析,该喷头的谐振频率计算值为61550Hz,驱动电压为36V时雾化面振幅计算值为8 μm;应用阻抗分析仪Pvc70A和激光微位移传感器CD5-L25对该喷头样机的谐振频率和雾化面的振幅进行了测试,喷头谐振频率的测试值为59699 Hz,与设计频率的相差0.5%,与有限元模态计算的频率相差3.0%,驱动电压为36V时振幅的测试值为8.63 μm,与有限元谐响应分析结果相差7.8%;应用Winner318B工业喷雾激光粒度分析仪对驱动电压分别为36和30 V喷头所产生的雾滴尺寸进行了测量,测量结果表明,电压对雾滴粒径分布没有显著影响,但是对最大雾化量影响较大;与28 kHz的超声雾化喷头相比,喷头的最大雾化量基本一致,体积和质量分别仅为28kHz超声雾化锥状喷头的5.54%和9.81%,并且其产生的雾滴更细。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: Because the present low-frequency ultrasonic nozzles have such existing disadvantages as follows: high driving voltage,low working efficiency, serious heating of the driving circuit and nozzle,a large volume of low-frequency ultrasonic atomizers, a novel micro index ultrasonic nozzle whose working frequency was 60kHz was designed. According to the frequency equations, the basic sizes of the nozzle were determined. A finite element model of this nozzle was established too. Based on this nozzle's finite element model, a modal analysis, and a harmonious response analysis of this nozzle were conducted. The analysis and calculation results showed that the resonance frequency of the nozzle was 61550Hz and the amplitude of the atomization surface was 8 microns with a 36V driving voltage. Based on ARM9.0, a driving circuit of this nozzle was developed. This nozzle's working frequency as measured by Pvc70A and the atomization surface's amplitude that was generated by 36V driving voltage and measured by CD5-L25 were 59699Hz and 8.63 microns respectively. Compared with this nozzle's working frequency, this nozzle's frequency errors of design and as calculated by FEM were less than 0.5% and 3.0% respectively. The actual amplitude of the atomizing surface of this nozzle was 7.8% less than the harmonic response amplitude calculated by the finite element model. Winner 318B was applied to measure the sizes of the droplets generated by this nozzle driven by 36V and 30V voltage respectively, and the results showed that the voltage had no significant influence on the distribution of the droplets' sizes but on the maxim atomization quantity. Compared with a 28 kHz ultrasonic atomizer, the maxim atomization quantity of the atomizer was nearly identical, but the size and weight were 5.54% and 9.81% of the 28 kHz ultrasonic nozzle's respectively. Droplets generated by this nozzle were finer than those generated by a 28 kHz ultrasonic nozzle.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回