马仁会, 李小波, 李强, 任向宁. 农用地定级因素法与修正法比较分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2004, 20(6): 277-281.
    引用本文: 马仁会, 李小波, 李强, 任向宁. 农用地定级因素法与修正法比较分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2004, 20(6): 277-281.
    Ma Renhui, Li Xiaobo, Li Qiang, Ren Xiangning. Comparison and analysis of factor method and modifying method for agricultural land gradation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2004, 20(6): 277-281.
    Citation: Ma Renhui, Li Xiaobo, Li Qiang, Ren Xiangning. Comparison and analysis of factor method and modifying method for agricultural land gradation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2004, 20(6): 277-281.

    农用地定级因素法与修正法比较分析

    Comparison and analysis of factor method and modifying method for agricultural land gradation

    • 摘要: 以广东省惠阳市农用地定级研究为例,对因素法和修正法两种定级方法进行比较分析,论述了因素法和修正法的定级过程、应用特点、适用范围,以及定级成果的合理性。通过空间区分度(分异性)分析、空间重叠度(相同性)分析、级差收益分析和农用地等、级、价衔接分析,从不同方面论证了两种定级方法的可行性,认为修正法定级结果较符合当地实际。

       

      Abstract: Taking Huiyang City in Guangdong Province as an example for agricultural land gradation, factor method was compared with modifying method, and the process of gradation, the characteristics and scope of applications, and the rationality of the results of those two gradation methods were discussed. By the analysis of the space distinction(difference), space superposition (sameness), the incomes from different gradations and the correlation of classification, gradation and evaluation, the feasibilities of factor method and modifying method were studied. The gradation result of modifying method is in good agreement with the local practical conditions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回