胡志斌, 何兴元, 李月辉, 朱教君, 李小玉, 穆阳, 关竹心. 岷江上游农林复合景观管理优先度评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(12): 63-69.
    引用本文: 胡志斌, 何兴元, 李月辉, 朱教君, 李小玉, 穆阳, 关竹心. 岷江上游农林复合景观管理优先度评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(12): 63-69.
    Hu Zhibin, He Xingyuan, Li Yuehui, Zhu Jiaojun, Li Xiaoyu, Mu Yang, Guan Zhuxin. Priority evluation of the agroforest landscape management of the upper reaches of Min River[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2007, 23(12): 63-69.
    Citation: Hu Zhibin, He Xingyuan, Li Yuehui, Zhu Jiaojun, Li Xiaoyu, Mu Yang, Guan Zhuxin. Priority evluation of the agroforest landscape management of the upper reaches of Min River[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2007, 23(12): 63-69.

    岷江上游农林复合景观管理优先度评价

    Priority evluation of the agroforest landscape management of the upper reaches of Min River

    • 摘要: 结合前期研究共辨识出10项景观管理影响因子,依据其作用的性质和特点,将其分为4大类参数,通过NetWeaver模型构建了基于模糊逻辑的优先度评价知识库,在EMDS(Ecosystem Management Decision Support system)和ARCGIS9.x环境下,对4类景观管理影响因子的优先度进行了评价。结果显示:1)可行性因子综合优先度评价结果为除ws3、ws6、ws8和ws9 4个子流域的优先度为低外,其余6个子流域优先度居于中等优先水平;2)有效性因子优先度综合评价结果,ws1、ws9和ws10 3个子流域优先度为强,ws8优先度最低,其余子流域为中等优先;3)景观综合结果除ws1~ws3 3个子流域属于强外,其余子流域优先度为低;4)所有影响因子的综合结果为ws8子流域优先度最低,其余部分优先度居于中等。

       

      Abstract: Ten influencing factors of agroforest landscape management were identified and classified into four classes based on their characteristics. Using the EMDS(Ecosystem Management Decision Support system) model embed in ARCGIS9.x platform, the priorities of all of the influencing factors were analyzed with assessment knowledge-base that was built by NetWeaver based on fuzzy logic theory. The results show that 1) in the integrity assessment of feasibility factors, four sub-watersheds, i.e., ws3, ws6, ws8 and ws9, are low priorities, the others six sub-watersheds are in moderate priorities; 2) in the integrity assessment of efficiency factors, the priorities of ws1, ws9 and ws10 are strongly supported, however ws8 is low supported. The other sub-watersheds are moderately supported; 3) The priorities analyses for landscape of all sub-watersheds are low supported except ws1-ws3, which are strongly supported; 4) The final assessment for all of the influencing factors show that all of the sub-watersheds are in the moderate support priorities except ws8, which is low priority.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回