彭世彰, 魏 征, 徐俊增, 缴锡云, 李盼盼. 参考作物腾发量支持向量回归机实时预报模型[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(10): 45-49.
    引用本文: 彭世彰, 魏 征, 徐俊增, 缴锡云, 李盼盼. 参考作物腾发量支持向量回归机实时预报模型[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(10): 45-49.
    Peng Shizhang, Wei Zheng, Xu Junzeng, Jiao Xiyun, Li Panpan. Real-time forecasting model of reference crop evapotranspiration based on support vector regression machines[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2009, 25(10): 45-49.
    Citation: Peng Shizhang, Wei Zheng, Xu Junzeng, Jiao Xiyun, Li Panpan. Real-time forecasting model of reference crop evapotranspiration based on support vector regression machines[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2009, 25(10): 45-49.

    参考作物腾发量支持向量回归机实时预报模型

    Real-time forecasting model of reference crop evapotranspiration based on support vector regression machines

    • 摘要: 为了实现高精度的实时预报作物需水量,利用结构风险最小化准则的思想以及核函数的非线性变换把空间变换到高维寻求全局最优解的方法,以最高温度、最低温度、日平均温度、天气阴晴指数和风力等级为输入因子,建立基于支持向量回归机的参考作物腾发量实时预报模型。以江苏南京站2003至2005年的日气象资料进行模型训练和预测,并将各输入因子进行±20%增噪后建立的支持向量回归机模型与传统BP网络模型作为对照。结果表明,支持向量回归机实时预报模型不仅精度高(有效性指数87.93%,平均误差0.2609,合格率87.4%),较传统BP网络模型(有效性指数78.91%,平均误差0.3526,合格率76.8%)有更优的泛化能力,且泛化能力不会因为增噪处理而降低,有较强的适应性及参数可移植性。

       

      Abstract: A support vector regression machines model for real-time forecasting of reference evapotranspiration was developed, based on the ideas of structural risk minimization of support vector machines, as well as the global optimum capacity via the nonlinear mapping to the high-dimensional space of the kernel function. The model input included maximum, minimum and average daily temperatures, weather index and wind scale. The observation data during the period from 2003 to 2005 at Nanjing, Jiangsu Province were used as training and validating data set. A support vector regression model and an add noised support vector regression model by noise were presented, and were compared with a BP neural network model. The results showed that the proposed model had high accuracy (effectiveness index is 87.93%, the average error is 0.2609, the passing rate is 87.4%), compared with the BP neural model (effectiveness index was 78.91%, the average error was 0.2609, the passing rate was 76.8%), it has superior generalization capacity, the generalization ability will not reduce by noise, it has a strong adaptability and portability parameters.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回