自由式分娩猪栏设计及应用效果

    Design of freedom farrowing pen and application effects

    • 摘要: 为克服分娩限位栏和传统分娩猪栏固有缺点,增加母猪运动量,降低仔猪死胎率和压死率,该研究设计了一种自由式分娩猪栏,并对其生产使用效果进行了评价。结果表明:分娩限位栏、传统分娩猪栏和自由式分娩猪栏的死胎率分别为(10.5±3.2)%,(4.1±2.5)%和(4.2±2.6)%(P<0.001)。无仔猪防压构件的传统分娩猪栏母猪从站立到躺卧时的后驱下落时间为3.9 s,产后24 h的翻滚频次高,仔猪被压死的风险较高,其仔猪压死率达(25.5±9.8)%,而分娩限位栏与自由式分娩猪栏的仔猪压死率相对较低,分别为(10.8±3.6)%和(9.24±5.5)%。与分娩限位栏相比,自由式分娩猪栏及传统分娩猪栏的仔猪断奶质量和日增质量都较好(P<0.05)。该研究认为自由式分娩猪栏有利于改善母猪及仔猪的健康与福利。

       

      Abstract: To overcome the inherent drawbacks of farrowing crate and traditional farrowing pen (without crate), a freedom farrowing pen was designed to decrease pre-weaning piglet mortality, and to increase sow locomotion space and litter performance. Application effects in practice were examined. Results indicated that the stillbirth rate was (10.5±3.2)%, (4.1±2.5)% and (4.2±2.6)% for freedom farrowing pens, traditional farrowing pens and farrowing crates, respectively (P<0.001). As compared to the counterparts from farrowing crates and freedom farrowing pens sows from traditional farrowing pens demonstrated shorter transition (falling) time (3.9 s) from standing to lying and higher frequencies of rolling behaviours after farrowing (24 h), due to no anti-crushing bars. Piglets from traditional farrowing pens encountered higher crushing risks, and the crushing mortality ((25.5±9.8)%) was higher than that of farrowing crate ((10.8±3.6)%) and freedom farrowing pen litters ((9.24±5.5)%). Moreover, piglet weaning weight and average daily gains was greater in freedom farrowing pens and traditional farrowing pens than those from farrowing crates (P<0.05). This research showed that the supply of freedom farrowing pen was conducive to enhancing health and welfare of the sow and litter.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回