赵云龙, 于贤昌, 李衍素, 贺超兴, 闫 妍. 碳晶电地热系统在日光温室番茄生产中的应用[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(7): 131-138.
    引用本文: 赵云龙, 于贤昌, 李衍素, 贺超兴, 闫 妍. 碳晶电地热系统在日光温室番茄生产中的应用[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(7): 131-138.
    Zhao Yunlong, Yu Xianchang, Li Yansu, He Chaoxing, Yan Yan. Application of electric carbon crystal soil-warming system for tomato production in greenhouse[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2013, 29(7): 131-138.
    Citation: Zhao Yunlong, Yu Xianchang, Li Yansu, He Chaoxing, Yan Yan. Application of electric carbon crystal soil-warming system for tomato production in greenhouse[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2013, 29(7): 131-138.

    碳晶电地热系统在日光温室番茄生产中的应用

    Application of electric carbon crystal soil-warming system for tomato production in greenhouse

    • 摘要: 针对中国节能型日光温室冬季土壤温度低而传统加温设备能耗高的特点,将碳晶电地热系统引入设施番茄栽培中。以不加温处理和发热电缆加温为对照,设碳晶电热板全掩埋、半掩埋、平放式3个处理,研究碳晶电地热系统不同加温方式对番茄生长、生理、产量影响,并结合设备前期投入、运行成本进行经济性评估。研究结果表明,碳晶电地热系统能显著(P<0.05)提高地温,但对气温影响不显著。与不加温相比,碳晶电地热系统全掩埋加温处理能显著提高番茄根系活力和光合速率,前期产量、总产量分别增加38.7%和28.2%,但与发热电缆相比差异不明显;半掩埋、平放式加温方式的番茄产量与不加温对照无显著差异。设备前期投入成本比较结果如下,燃煤锅炉(27元/m2)>碳晶电地热系统(19元/m2)>发热电缆(9元/m2);运行费用比较,发热电缆(12.51元/m2)>碳晶电地热系统(9.38元/m2)>燃煤锅炉(5.37元/m2),研究结果为碳晶电地热系统在日光温室番茄冬春季节加温栽培中的推广应用提供参考。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: The soil temperature is one of the most important and direct factors for vegetables, but it was often below the optimum growing temperature of vegetables in a Chinese solar greenhouse during the winter. There are some warming facilities in a greenhouse such as a warming cable, warm air oil furnace, water or ground-source heat pump and traditional coal-fired boiler but their installation cost or power consumption are priced beyond an affordable level. An electric carbon crystal soil-warming system, a new warming device applied in winter heating for civil architecture, was introduced and redesigned into solar greenhouse tomato production in this experiment. A carbon crystal board was fully buried, half buried and laid flat on the top of substrate (not buried) to heat the 10 cm-depth-substrate to or over 17 ℃. The soil and air temperature, the amount of growth, some physiological characteristics such as root activity etc., production of tomato and power consumption were detected.The results showed that the electric warming facilities, including electric carbon crystal soil-warming system and warming cable, significantly (P<0.05) enhanced the soil temperature, but had no influence on air temperature. Differences of soil temperature fields between the electric carbon crystal soil-warming system and warming cable were quite obvious as the result of their different heating area. Root activity and leaf photosynthetic rate of tomatos were improved remarkably by both the whole buried method and warming cable. Moreover, the early and total yields of tomato by the whole buried method were 38.7% and 28.2% higher than those of CK respectively. However, the tomato yield of half-buried and no-buried method had no difference from those of CK. Comparing with the energy consumption,the whole buried method is better than warming cable because the level of tomato production was enhanced the highest and its power consumption was 25.1% lower than those of warming cable. But nowadays, the installation cost of an electric carbon crystal soil-warming system equals twice cost of warming cable. Both the electric carbon crystal soil-warming system and warming cable share a higher running cost than heating by the traditional coal-fired boiler. There is also a promising prospect for the electric carbon crystal soil-warming system to applied in protected vegetable production because of its outstanding energy saving and cost-reduction with the technology innovation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回