杨歆歆, 赵庚星, 李涛, 万广华, 李萍. 山东省土壤酸化特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(z2): 155-160. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.z2.021
    引用本文: 杨歆歆, 赵庚星, 李涛, 万广华, 李萍. 山东省土壤酸化特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(z2): 155-160. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.z2.021
    Yang Xinxin, Zhao Gengxing, Li Tao, Wan Guanghua, Li Ping. Characteristics of soil acidification and its influencing factors in Shandong province[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(z2): 155-160. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.z2.021
    Citation: Yang Xinxin, Zhao Gengxing, Li Tao, Wan Guanghua, Li Ping. Characteristics of soil acidification and its influencing factors in Shandong province[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(z2): 155-160. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.z2.021

    山东省土壤酸化特征及其影响因素分析

    Characteristics of soil acidification and its influencing factors in Shandong province

    • 摘要: 为弄清山东省土壤酸化状况,采用统计分析和空间分析方法,对山东省测土配方施肥项目数据进行分析,并与第2次全国土壤普查的部分数据作比较,分析山东省不同区域、不同土地利用类型、不同土类的土壤酸化状况。结果表明:1)山东省的酸化土壤面积为126.4万hm2,占全省土壤面积的8.13%,与第2次全国土壤普查相比,酸化面积增加了8.07%;2)山东省土壤pH值呈现自西向东、由北向南逐渐减小的趋势,酸化土壤集中分布在鲁东和鲁南地区的威海市、烟台市、日照市、青岛市和临沂市;3)不同土地利用类型中,园地中的茶园酸化程度较重,耕地酸化程度最轻;4)不同土类中,棕壤酸化程度最重,潮土酸化程度最轻。山东省土壤酸化呈现严重的趋势,其自然地理气候条件、不同土地利用方式以及施肥管理等是可能导致土壤酸化的主要原因。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: Soil acidification can change the configuration of soil nutrients, affect soil biological activity, so as to affect the growth and development of crops, and bring a series of ecological environmental problems. Soil acidification was a major problem in intensive Chinese agriculture systems. This research was carried out to investigate the soil acidification in Shandong province and provide scientific basis for improving the soil quality using statistical and spatial analytical methods. The soil data collected from the soil testing formula fertilization program in Shandong province were compared with those collected from the second national soil survey. Soil acidification of Shandong province was showed with pH spatial distribution map using inverse distance weighted in ArcGIS. Soil acidification in different regions, land use types, and soil types was analyzed. Results showed that the soil in Shandong province was mainly weak-acidic, neutral and weak-alkaline. The average of pH value was 7.1 and the acidified soil area was 1.26 million hectares accounted for 8.13% of the province. Compared to the second national soil survey data, the percentage of soil acidification area was increased by 8.07%. The soil pH value of Shandong province decreased from west to east and from north to south gradually. The acidification soil was mainly located in the eastern and southern regions of the province, especially in Weihai, Yantai, Rizhao, Qingdao and Linyi city. The soil acidification of Weihai city was the most serious, accounting for 67.94% of the city's soil area. Under different agricultural land use, the soil pH averages of farmland, garden and forestry decreased in turn. The soil acidification of tea garden was the most serious in garden, while the mulberry garden was the least. The soil acidification of vegetable field was the most serious in farmland, while the cropland was the least. As to different soil groups, the fluvio-aquatic soil was mainly weak-alkaline, accounting for 67.87% of this soil group points. The cinnamon soil, lime concretion black soil, paddy soil were mainly neutral, accounting for 50.66%, 36.54% and 54.07% of these three soil group points, respectively. The skeletal soil and brown earth were mainly weak-acidic, accounting for 38.90% and 41.22% of these two soil group points, respectively. The soil pH averages of fluvio-aquatic soil, cinnamon soil, lime concretion black soil, paddy soil, skeletal soil and brown earth decreased in turn. The soil acidification of brown earth was the most serious, while fluvio-aquatic soil was the least acid. The soil acidification in Shandong province showed an increasingly serious trend may due to the natural geographic and climatic conditions of local environment. Additionally, other possible factors such as different land use types, unreasonable fertilizations and managements were also accountable. By adjusting soil pH value, the contents of soil nutrients could be controlled and the growth of crops could be promoted.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回