刘善梅, 李小昱, 钟雄斌. 考虑品种差异的冷鲜猪肉含水率高光谱信号补正算法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(4): 272-278. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.04.033
    引用本文: 刘善梅, 李小昱, 钟雄斌. 考虑品种差异的冷鲜猪肉含水率高光谱信号补正算法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(4): 272-278. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.04.033
    Liu Shanmei, Li Xiaoyu, Zhong Xiongbin. Hyperspectral signal correction algorithm for water content of cold fresh pork with considering difference between varieties[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2014, 30(4): 272-278. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.04.033
    Citation: Liu Shanmei, Li Xiaoyu, Zhong Xiongbin. Hyperspectral signal correction algorithm for water content of cold fresh pork with considering difference between varieties[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2014, 30(4): 272-278. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.04.033

    考虑品种差异的冷鲜猪肉含水率高光谱信号补正算法

    Hyperspectral signal correction algorithm for water content of cold fresh pork with considering difference between varieties

    • 摘要: 为提高含水率高光谱校正模型对不同品种冷鲜猪肉样本的适用性,该文提出了1种品种敏感波段选择结合分段直接校正的高光谱信号补正方法。首先用主品种偏最小二乘回归模型和添加了7个从品种样本后更新模型的模型回归系数相对差异值,以此选出对品种敏感的波段,然后采用分段直接校正算法对选中波段的光谱信号补正,以消除品种差异对模型预测效果的影响。以猪肉含水率为检测指标,以零号土猪肉为主品种,以恩施山黑猪为从品种,经该算法补正后,主品种模型对从品种样本的预测均方根误差从补正前的1.42%减小到0.50%,预测决定系数从0.20提高到0.84, 预测偏差比率(residual prediction deviation,RPD)从0.91提高到2.58。结果表明,该文提出的补正算法能显著提高零号土猪肉含水率模型对恩施山黑猪含水率的预测能力。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: In order to improve the generality of the water content hyperspectral calibration model for different varieties of cold fresh pork, a new hyperspectral signal correction algorithm called a variety sensitive wavelength selection combining with piecewise direct standardization (VSWS-PDS) is proposed. The variety sensitive wavelengths were first selected, based on a regression coefficient of the partial least square regression (PLSR) model, then the piecewise direct standardization(PDS) algorithm was utilized to correct the selected wavelengths and to eliminate the impact of variety difference on model prediction results. The detailed process of the VSWS-PDS algorithm is illustrated as follows: (1) The samples of the "master" variety were divided into calibration set mC and prediction set mP by utilizing the Kennard and Stone(KS) algorithms. (2) A PLSR model named PLSR1 was built with a calibration set mC. (3) A small quantity of representative "slave" variety samples selected from "slave" variety samples by utilizing sample set partitioning based on a joint X-Y distances (SPXY) algorithm were added to mC,and then a new PLSR model named PLSR2 was built. (4) The variety sensitive wavelengths were selected on the basis of the relative difference between the regression coefficients of model PLSR1 and PLSR2. (5) The standardization samples mTC were selected among the calibration samples mC by utilizing the KS algorithm, then the Euclidean distances between the physical or chemical reference values of the sample set mTC and all of the "slave" variety samples were calculated one by one, the "slave" variety samples with the minimum distance from mTC were chosen as standardization samples, yielding sTC, and the rest, yielding sP. (6) The average spectrum of mTC and sTC was calculated, yielding mTmean and sTmean. If wavelength i was variety sensitive, a new spectrum matrix Zi was reconstructed from sTmean in a small window from i-k to i+k, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model was built between the spectral intensity mTmeani and the corresponding spectrum matrix Zi, then the regression coefficient vector bi was obtained. If wavelength i was not variety sensitive, then bi was equal to 1. (7) The regression coefficient vectors were placed in a banded diagonal transfer matrix F. (8) The "slave" variety samples sP are chosen to evaluate the correction effect of the VSWS-PDS algorithm. First of all, spectrum matrix was obtained from sP, yielding XStest. Subsequently, matrix XStest was multiplied by the transfer matrix F, yielding XStesttrans, and then the "master" variety calibration model PLSR1 was utilized to predict the physical or chemical values corresponding to XStesttrans directly. The prediction results of PLSR1 were used to evaluate the correction effect of the VSWS-PDS algorithm. The No. 0 indigenous pork was selected as the "master" variety and the Enshi mountain pork was selected as the "slave" variety. The spectra of the "slave" variety samples sP were corrected by the VSWS-PDS algorithm, water content was then predicted by the "master" variety calibration model PLSR1 with the cross validation determination coefficients () of 0.91, cross validation root mean square error (RMSECV) of 0.29% ,and cross validation residual prediction deviation (RPD) of 3.3, with prediction determination coefficients () of 0.84, prediction root mean square error(RMSEP) of 0.50%, and prediction RPD of 2.58. Meanwhile, the experimental results without the VSWS-PDS correction process were of 0.20, RMSEP of 1.42%, and prediction RPD of 0.91. Obviously, the VSWS-PDS algorithm can significantly improve the prediction ability of the model built with No. 0 indigenous pork samples to predict water content of the Enshi mountain pork samples. Finally, a comparative study between direct standardization (DS), PDS, and the VSWS-PDS is conducted. It is shown that the transfer results obtained with the proposed method VSWS-PDS were better than those obtained by DS or PDS.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回