周 萍, 刘国彬, 侯喜禄. 黄土丘陵区退耕前后典型流域农业生态经济系统能值分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(6): 266-273.
    引用本文: 周 萍, 刘国彬, 侯喜禄. 黄土丘陵区退耕前后典型流域农业生态经济系统能值分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(6): 266-273.
    Zhou Ping, Liu Guobin, Hou Xilu. Energy analysis of agricultural eco-economic system before and after grain for green in typical watershed in loess hilly region of China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2009, 25(6): 266-273.
    Citation: Zhou Ping, Liu Guobin, Hou Xilu. Energy analysis of agricultural eco-economic system before and after grain for green in typical watershed in loess hilly region of China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2009, 25(6): 266-273.

    黄土丘陵区退耕前后典型流域农业生态经济系统能值分析

    Energy analysis of agricultural eco-economic system before and after grain for green in typical watershed in loess hilly region of China

    • 摘要: 应用能值分析理论和方法,从资源的投入和产出结构角度对黄土丘陵区退耕还林草政策实施前后纸坊沟流域农业生态经济系统的资源利用、环境压力、能值指标变化及生态经济效益进行比较研究。结果表明:退耕前,该流域农业生态经济系统农产品总产出能值为7.53E+18 sej,退耕后减小了1.50E+17 sej,单位面积农产品生产力由退耕前的5.38E+15 sej/hm2上升到退耕后的1.68E+16 sej/hm2,畜产品的产出能值有所下降。退耕后系统生产优势度指数由退耕前的0.60上升到0.72,系统稳定性指数由退耕前的0.51增加到退耕后的0.53,退耕后流域人口承载力较退耕前大。退耕前后该流域能值投入率及环境负荷几乎无变化,净能值产出率由0.11增加到0.29,退耕前流域人均能值用量为5.16×1015 sej,退耕后增加到5.41×1015 sej,系统可持续发展指数由退耕前的2.55上升到退耕之后的6.69。退耕后,能值-货币比为2.21×1012 sej/$,与退耕前相比变化不大。为了使该流域的农业生态系统更加持续稳定的发展,需进一步调整农业结构,优化资源投入配置,提高资源生产效率,减小环境负荷,逐步走向系统可持续性不断增强的健康发展轨道。

       

      Abstract: Based on emergy theory and method, resource utilization, environmental pressure, variation of emergy indexes and efficiency of agricultural eco-economic system were analyzed before and after “grain for green policy” from resource input and output in zhifanggou watershed in loess hilly region of China. The results showed that the total emergy output of agricultural products of agricultural eco-economic system was 7.53E+18 sej before grain for green in watershed, and decreased 1.50E+17 sej after this policy. The production of agricultural products per unit area increased from 5.38E+15 sej/hm2 to 1.68E+16 sej/hm2 and emergy output of animal products decreased. The dominance index of system production increased from 0.60 to 0.72, the stability index of system increased from 0.51 to 0.53, and the population carrying capacity was also increased after grain for green. However, emergy investment ratio and environmental loading were nearly stable. Net emergy yield ratio increased from 0.11 to 0.29, and emergy per capita also change from 5.16×1015 sej to 5.41×1015 sej. Index of system sustainable development also increased from 2.55 to 6.69. After grain for green, the ratio of emergy-monetary was 2.21×1012 sej/$, which changed little as compared with before returning farmland. For sustainable and stable development of agricultural ecosystem in zhifanggou watershed, adjusting agricultural structure, optimizing the allocation of resource input, improving resource productivity and reducing the environmental loading were all needed in the next step. In this way, the agriculture of zhifanggou watershed could develop more sustainable and healthy.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回