Li Pengfei, Zhang Xingchang, Hao Mingde, Zhang Yanjiang, Cui Yongxing, Zhu Shilei. Soil quality evaluation for reclamation of mining area on Loess Plateau based on minimum data set[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(16): 265-273. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.16.030
    Citation: Li Pengfei, Zhang Xingchang, Hao Mingde, Zhang Yanjiang, Cui Yongxing, Zhu Shilei. Soil quality evaluation for reclamation of mining area on Loess Plateau based on minimum data set[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(16): 265-273. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.16.030

    Soil quality evaluation for reclamation of mining area on Loess Plateau based on minimum data set

    • Mineral exploitation affects soil quality especially in the ecologically fragile areas the Loess Plateau. The quality of soil can be improved by vegetation restoration. In order to reveal the changes of soil quality in the process of vegetation restoration in the reclaimed land of mining, we took Heidaigou mining area and the surrounding natural vegetation restoration area as the research area, and selected 21 physicochemical indicators as the total data set (TDS). The minimum data set (MDS) was constructed by using principal component analysis (PCA) and Norm values. Two evaluation methods, non-linear (NL) and Linear (L), were used to evaluate the soil quality in this study area. The results show that the minimum data set include percentage of silt (Silt), organic matter (OM), available phosphorus (AP), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and microbial carbon (MBC). It indicates that in addition to conventional nutrients and physical properties, soil quality in this region is restricted by salinization and microbial biomass. The order of weight of MDS was: MBC (0.241) > OM (0.235) > AP (0.193) > Silt (0.174) > SAR (0.157). The applicability of the two evaluation methods is verified and we find that the overall spatial pattern of soil quality obtained by the two methods is similar, but there are still differences in details. According to the analysis results of the two evaluation methods, soil quality index (SQI) were all significantly improved by vegetation restoration (P < 0.05).Under different vegetation restoration types, the average value of the SQI-NL based on the MDS was sorted as follows: natural vegetation restoration land (NL, 0.587) > shrubs reclamation for 20 years (RLS 20, 0.479) > herbs reclamation for 12 years (RLH 12, 0.455) > shrubs reclamation for 10 years (RLS 10, 0.453) > herbs reclamation for 20 years (RLH 20, 0.424) > arbors reclamation for 20 years (RLA 20, 0.364) > and unreclaimed land (UL, 0.262) (P < 0.05), the average value of the SQI-L based on the MDS was sorted as follows: NL (0.522) > RLS 20 (0.444), > RLS 10 (0.412), > RLH 12 (0.401) > RLH 20 (0.400) > RLA 20 (0.326) > UL (0.228) (P < 0.05). In summary, different vegetation restoration years and different vegetation restoration types significantly improved the SQI of reclaimed land of mine areas (P < 0.05); however, the SQI of all reclaimed land has not reached that of natural vegetation restoration land, which indicates that the soil quality restoration of reclaimed land of mine areas is a long process. Since the SQI - NL method has a wider value range of SQI and coefficient of variation, this method has better applicability in this region than SQI-L, this is because 1) in the case of a wide range of soil quality index, the identification and classification accuracy of soil quality can be improved, which is conducive to the accurate evaluation of soil quality status and the timely detection of problems; 2) the coefficient of variation represents the sensitivity of SQI to changes in different environmental conditions, the higher the sensitivity of soil quality index to changes in environmental conditions is, the clearer the influence factors of soil quality change can be reflected, thus more effectively guiding the scientific management of soil quality improvement. Under the SQI-NL and SQI-L methods, the determination coefficients between MDS and TDS are 0.911 and 0.866, respectively, indicating that MDS can accurately replace TDS for soil quality evaluation. This study summarizes the MDS and soil quality evaluation methods suitable for the reclamation soil quality evaluation in the mining areas of the Loess Plateau, and recommends the future research and application in the same area and soil conditions.
    • loading

    Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return