Gradient effects and ecological zoning of ecosystem services in transition zone of Beijing Bay

Liu Xiaona; Liu Chunlan; Chen Long; Pei Sha; Qiao Qing

doi:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.12.033

Volume 36 Issue 12

Jun. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE) > 2020 > 36(12): 276-285. > DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.12.033

Liu Xiaona, Liu Chunlan, Chen Long, Pei Sha, Qiao Qing. Gradient effects and ecological zoning of ecosystem services in transition zone of Beijing Bay[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(12): 276-285. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.12.033

Citation:

PDF (7287 KB)

Gradient effects and ecological zoning of ecosystem services in transition zone of Beijing Bay

Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environment Protection, National Urban Environmental Pollution Control Engineering Research Center, Beijing 100037, China

More Information

Received Date: February 12, 2020
Revised Date: April 20, 2020
Published Date: June 14, 2020

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The transitional zone of Beijing Bay forms the mountain-plain boundary lines and rural-urban social distinctions. The balance of ecological protection and economic development dominates in the regional boundary. Therefore, there is a significant gradient effect on the supply of ecosystem service in the Beijing Bay. In this study, nine typical ecosystem services were evaluated in the Beijing Bay using grids as the research unit, according to the biophysical processes formed by ecosystem services. Vegetation coverage and land development intensity were used to characterize gradient effect of ecosystem services, further to delineate four partitions with the dominant ecosystem service. The results showed that: 1) There was remarkable spatial variation in the distribution of ecosystem services due to the different formation process and influencing factors. Some services, such as food supply, increased from the hilly mountain to plain areas, indicating that ecosystem was greatly affected by human activity. The supply of ecosystem services, such as biodiversity, showed an opposite trend, due to ecosystem types and biophysical processes increased from flat plain to mountain. Specifically, water conservation and recreation determined the supply of ecosystem services. 2) Except recreation, most ecosystem services showed obviously gradient effects with vegetation coverage and i land development intensity. Each ecosystem service can be identified 0-2 mutation points along the change of two factors. In vegetation coverage, the mutation points of ecosystem services were 0.45-0.56, whereas in the intensity of land development were 15%-31%. Food supply and water quality regulation revealed a dramatic decrease as the increase in vegetation coverage between two identified mutation points. Water retention, quality regulation of air and soil increased significantly with the increase of vegetation coverage below the one identified mutation point. Carbon storage and erosion control constantly increased as the increase in vegetation coverage. Biodiversity enhanced remarkably with the increase of vegetation coverage between two identified mutation points. Food supply and water quality regulation showed an increasing trend with the improvement of land development intensity. Other ecosystem services continuously showed a significant downward trend with the increase in the intensity of land development. There was no mutation in water retention, carbon storage, erosion control and soil quality regulation with land development intensity. 3) Using the mutation points of vegetation coverage and land development intensity, the transitional zone of Beijing Bay was divided into four ecological regions, where the vegetation coverage of 0.45 and 15% intensity of land development. Natural or near natural region was dominated by regulation services, whereas the artificial area was dominated by supply services. Both semi-natural and semi-artificial regions were dominated by regulation and supply services, with an emphasis on a certain transitional feature. An optimized strategy of ecosystem services was proposed, according to the characteristics of different ecological regions. The findings can provide a sound basis for ecological protection, ecological restoration, and compensation policies, further to promote the sustainable development of local ecosystems.
- ecology,
- zoning,
- ecosystem services,
- spatial distribution,
- vegetation coverage,
- land development intensity

FullText(HTML)

References (46)

References

[1]	Hou J. An Historical Geography of Peiping[D]. Liverpool: University of Liverpool, 1949.
[2]	王纪武. 山地平原生态交错带城镇生态格局研究[J]. 城市发展研究，2009，16(12)：56-62.Wang Jiwu. Study on urban ecological pattern in mountain and plain ecotone[J]. Urban Studies, 2009, 16(12): 56-62. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	傅伯杰，陈利顶，马克明，等. 景观生态学原理及应用[M]. 北京：科学出版社，2001.
[4]	李全，李腾，杨明正，等. 基于梯度分析的武汉市生态系统服务价值时空分异特征[J]. 生态学报，2017，37(6)：2118-2125.Li Quan, Li Teng, Yang Mingzheng, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of ecosystem services value based on gradient analysis in Wuhan: 2000-2010[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(6): 2118-2125. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	何玲，贾启建，李超，等. 基于生态系统服务价值和生态安全格局的土地利用格局模拟[J]. 农业工程学报，2016，32(3)：275-284.He Ling, Jia Qijian, Li Chao, et al. Land use pattern simulation based on ecosystem service value and ecologicalsecurity pattern[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(3): 275-284. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	潘竟虎，李真. 干旱内陆河流域生态系统服务空间权衡与协同作用分析[J]. 农业工程学报，2017，33(17)：280-289.Pan Jinghu, Li Zhen. Analysis on trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in arid inland river basin[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2017, 33(17): 280-289. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	McDonnell M J, Pickett S T A, Groffman P, et al. Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 1997, 1(1): 21-36.
[8]	Herrero-Jáuregui C, Arnaiz-Schmitz C, Herrera L, et al. Aligning landscape structure with ecosystem services along an urban-rural gradient. trade-offs and transitions towards cultural services[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2018, 34: 1-21.
[9]	Radford K, James P. Changes in the value of ecosystem services along a rural-urban gradient: A case study of Greater Manchester, UK[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 109(1): 117-127.
[10]	Ye Y, Zhang J, Bryan B A, et al. Impacts of rapid urbanization on ecosystem services along urban-rural gradients: A case study of the Guangzhou-Foshan Metropolitan Area, South China[J]. Ecoscience, 2018, 25(3): 1-13.
[11]	Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D, et al. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics[J]. Land Use Policy, 2012, 29(3): 521-535.
[12]	Mario V B, Julio C, Annrica Z. Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 75(1): 711-725.
[13]	Larondelle N, D H. Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural-urban gradient: A cross-analysis of European cities[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 29: 179-190.
[14]	Francisco D L B, Rubio P, Banzhaf E. The value of vegetation cover for ecosystem services in the suburban context[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2016, 16: 110-122.
[15]	徐煖银，孙思琦，薛达元，等. 基于地形梯度的赣南地区生态系统服务价值对人为干扰的空间响应[J]. 生态学报，2019，39(1)：97-107.Xu Nuanyin, Sun Siqi, Xue Dayuan, et al. Ecosystem service value and its spatial response to human interference on the basis of terrain gradient in Gannan region, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(1): 97-107. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	Xu Y, Tang H P, Wang B J, et al. Effects of land-use intensity on ecosystem services and human well-being: A case study in Huailai County, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(5): 1-11.
[17]	Liu L, Wang Z, Wang Y, et al. Trade-off analyses of multiple mountain ecosystem services along elevation, vegetation cover and precipitation gradients: A case study in the Taihang Mountains[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 103: 94-104.
[18]	姚小薇，曾杰，李旺君. 武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征[J]. 农业工程学报，2015，31(9)：249-256.Yao Xiaowei, Zeng Jie, Li Wangjun. Spatial correlationcharacteristics of urbanization and land ecosystem servicevalue in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration[J]. Transactions of theChinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions ofthe CSAE), 2015, 31(9): 249-256. (in Chinese with Englishabstract)
[19]	约日古丽卡斯木，杨胜天，孜比布拉·司马义. 新疆艾比湖流域土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 农业工程学报，2019，35(2)：260-269.Yueriguli Kasimu, Yang Shengtian, Zibibula Simayi. Impact of land use change on ecosystem service value in Ebinur Lake Basin, Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(2): 260-269. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	张鹏岩，耿文亮，杨丹，等. 黄河下游地区土地利用和生态系统服务价值的时空演变[J]. 农业工程学报， 2020， 36(11)：277-288.Zhang Pengyan, Geng Wenliang, Yang Dan, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of land use and ecosystem service value in the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River Region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(11): 277-288. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	俞孔坚，袁弘，李迪华，等. 北京市浅山区土地可持续利用的困境与出路[J]. 中国土地科学，2009，23(11): 3-8.Yu Kongjian, Yuan Hong, Li Dihua, et al. Difficulties and solutions of the sustainable land use strategy in suburban hilly area in Beijing [J]. China Land Science, 2009, 23(11): 3-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	俞孔坚，许立言，游鸿，等. 北京市浅山区农村社会经济发展类型区划分: 基于二步聚类法[J]. 城市发展研究，2010，17(12)：66-71.Yu Kongjian, Xu Liyan, You Hong, et al. The socio- economical zoning of the suburb hilly rural area in Beijing: A two-step cluster approach[J]. Urban Studies, 2010, 17(12): 66-71. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	李苗苗，吴炳方，颜长珍，等. 密云水库上游植被覆盖度的遥感估算[J]. 资源科学，2004，26(4)：153-159.Li Miaomiao, Wu Bingfang, Yan Changzhen, et al. Estimation of vegetation fraction in the upper basin of Miyun Reservoir by remote sensing[J]. Resources Science, 2004，26(4)：153-159. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	Li B, Chen D, Wu S, et al. Spatio-temporal assessment of urbanization impacts on ecosystem services: Case study of Nanjing City, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 71: 416-427.
[25]	李盈盈，刘康，胡胜，等. 陕西省子午岭生态功能区水源涵养能力研究[J]. 干旱区地理，2015，38(3)：636-642.Li Yingying, Liu Kang, Hu Sheng, et al. Water conservation function of Ziwuling ecological area in Shaanxi Province[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2015, 38(3): 636-642. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	Sharp R, Chaplin-Kramer R, Wood S A, et al. InVEST 3.3.0 User's Guide[M/OL]. 2015. http://data. naturalcapitalproject.org/ nightly-build/invest-users-guide/html/
[27]	符素华，王红叶，王向亮，等. 北京地区径流曲线数模型中的径流曲线数[J]. 地理研究，2013，32(5)：797-807.Fu Suhua, Wang Hongye, Wang Xiangliang, et al. The runoff curve number of SCS-CN method in Beijing[J]. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(5): 797-807. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	耿润哲，王晓燕，焦帅，等. 密云水库流域非点源污染负荷估算及特征分析[J]. 环境科学学报，2013，33(5)：1484-1492.Geng Runzhe, Wang Xiaoyan, Jiao Shuai, et al. Application of improved export coefficient model in estimating non-point source nutrient load from Miyun reservoir watersheds[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2013, 33(5): 1484-1492. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	Nowak D J, Crane D E, Stevens J C. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States[J]. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2006, 4(3/4): 115-123.
[30]	陈龙，刘春兰，潘涛，等. 基于干沉降模型的北京平原区造林削减PM2.5效应评估[J]. 生态学杂志，2014，33(11)：2897-2904.Chen Long, Liu Chunlan, Pan Tao, et al. Assessment of the effect of PM2.5 reduction by plain afforestation project in Beijing based on dry deposition model[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014, 33(11): 2897-2904. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	方精云，刘国华，徐嵩龄. 我国森林植被的生物量和净生产量[J]. 生态学报，1996，16(5)：497-508.Fang Jingyun, Liu Guohua, Xu Songling. Biomass and net production of forest vegetation in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1996, 16(5): 497-508. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	王光华，北京森林植被固碳能力研究[D]. 北京：北京林业大学，2012.Wang Guanghua. Carbon Sequestration Capability of Forest Vegetation in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	刘宝元，毕小刚，符素华. 北京土壤流失方程[M]. 北京：科学出版社，2010.
[34]	Maes J, Paracchini M L, Zulian G. A European assessment of the provision of ecosystem services towards an atlas of ecosystem services[R]. Italy: Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability, 2011.
[35]	Santos-Martín F, Zorrilla-Miras P, Palomo I, et al. Protecting nature is necessary but not sufficient for conserving ecosystem services: A comprehensive assessment along a gradient of land-use intensity in Spain[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2019, 35: 43-51.
[36]	Anastasiou A, Fryzlewicz P. Detecting multiple generalized change-points by isolating single ones[Z]. [2019-12-10] https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=IDetect.
[37]	Lautenbach S, Kugel C, Lausch A, et al. Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2011, 11: 676-687.
[38]	Lin S W, Wu R D, Yang F L, et al. Spatial trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services within a global biodiversity hotspot[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 84: 371-381.
[39]	Kong L Q, Zheng H, Xiao Y, et al. Mapping ecosystem service bundles to detect distinct types of multifunctionality within the diverse landscape of the Yangtze River Basin, China[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(3): 1-16.
[40]	Zhang Z Y, Liu Y F, Wang Y H, et al. What factors affect the synergy and tradeoff between ecosystem services, and how, from a geospatial perspective?[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 257: 120454.
[41]	Yang Y Y, Zheng H, Kong L Q, et al. Mapping ecosystem services bundles to detect high- and low-value ecosystem services areas for land use management[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 225: 11-17.
[42]	Chen T Q, Feng Z, Zhao H F, et al. Identification of ecosystem service bundles and driving factors in Beijing and its surrounding areas[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 711: 134687.
[43]	Zhao Y Y, Wu J G, He C Y, et al. Linking wind erosion to ecosystem services in drylands: A landscape ecological approach[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32: 2399-2417.
[44]	Peng J, Tian L, Liu Y X, et al. Ecosystem services response to urbanization in metropolitan areas: Thresholds identification[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017(607/608): 706-714.
[45]	王莉雁，肖燚，江凌，等. 城镇化发展对呼包鄂地区生态系统服务功能的影响[J]. 生态学报，2016，36(19)：6031-6039.Wang Liyan, Xiao Yi, Jiang Ling, et al. The influence of urbanization on ecosystem services in the Hohhot-Baotou- Ordos region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(19): 6031-6039. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[46]	李慧蕾，彭建，胡熠娜，等. 基于生态系统服务簇的内蒙古自治区生态功能分区[J]. 应用生态学报，2017，28(8)：2657-2666.Li Huilei, Peng Jian, Hu Yina, et al. Ecological function zoning in Inner Mongolia Autonomous region based on ecosystem service bundles[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(8): 2657-2666. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

1.	牛强，伍磊，刘悦，张伟铭，李皓晟. 国土空间规划的生态服务价值评估和方案优选——基于“土地利用+生态效能”的双维复合视角. 生态经济. 2024(02): 156-163 .
2.	柯钦华，周俏薇，庄宝怡，孙传谆. 基于生态系统服务供需平衡的粤港澳大湾区生态安全格局构建. 生态学报. 2024(05): 1765-1779 .
3.	王雯，侯青青，裴婷婷. 甘肃河东地区坡度对生态系统服务的影响及其阈值效应. 生态环境学报. 2024(07): 1117-1129 .
4.	柯钦华，周俏薇，孙传谆，李景刚，李灿，朱庆莹. 基于生态系统服务权衡的粤港澳大湾区土地利用冲突识别研究. 热带地理. 2023(07): 1426-1439 .
5.	张海洋，杨琰瑛，刘凯，周滨，苏德岳，马成，师荣光. 基于生态系统服务的流域分区规划与管理——以于桥水库流域为例. 农业资源与环境学报. 2023(05): 1028-1039 .
6.	刘小波，王玉宽，刘勤，李政旸. 基于城市化梯度的中国西南地区生态系统服务权衡与协同. 生态学报. 2023(22): 9416-9429 .
7.	蔡振饶，方朝阳，何清华，颜吉林，高丹，刘志勇. 基于景观聚类的南昌市主城区城乡梯度识别及其生态系统服务响应. 环境科学研究. 2022(03): 806-817 .
8.	张少尧，邓伟，胡茂桂，张昊，王占韵，彭立. 山区过渡性地理空间人文自然交互性识别与分异解析. 地理学报. 2022(05): 1225-1243 .
9.	勾蒙蒙，李乐，刘常富，肖文发，王娜，欧阳帅，胡建文. 大宁河流域生态系统服务权衡关系梯度效应. 生态学报. 2022(18): 7445-7457 .
10.	卫彦宏，乔旭宁，张仲伍，杨永菊，牛海鹏. 基于气候带与农业区划的农田生态系统服务权衡及驱动机制. 农业工程学报. 2022(20): 220-228 . 本站查看