Spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of trade-offs/synergies in land use functions in Hangzhou City, China

Zhu Congmou; Yuan Shaofeng

doi:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.06.030

Volume 38 Issue 6

Mar. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE) > 2022 > 38(6): 264-273. > DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.06.030

Zhu Congmou, Yuan Shaofeng. Spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of trade-offs/synergies in land use functions in Hangzhou City, China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(6): 264-273. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.06.030

Citation:

PDF (6365 KB)

Spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of trade-offs/synergies in land use functions in Hangzhou City, China

School of Public Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China

More Information

Received Date: December 27, 2021
Revised Date: February 19, 2022
Published Date: March 30, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract: The contradictions between land production, living, and ecological functions have gradually emerged, as industrialization and urbanization continue to advance. It is necessary to accurately allocate and coordinate the functions of land development and protection for the reasonable distribution of human activities in sustainable agriculture. This study aims to explore the spatiotemporal characteristics of trade-offs/synergies in the land use functions and the influencing factors. Taking Hangzhou City of China as an example, an attempt was made to evaluate the land production, living and ecological functions at the fine scale from 2000 to 2018 using the multi-source data and a series of geospatial models. Then, the correlation analysis was used to reveal the trade-offs/synergies of land use functions at the global and grid scales. The influencing factors of land use function trade-offs/synergies were also identified by the linear regression model. The results showed that: (1) The living function showed a trade-off relationship with the production and ecological function between 2000 and 2018, whereas the trade-off intensity of production and living functions was stronger than that of living and ecological functions. Production and ecological functions were established to determine a synergistic relationship during the study period. There was a trend of increasing first and then decreasing in the trade-off relationship between production and living functions, where the trade-offs of living and ecological functions gradually weakened. The interactive relationship between production and ecological functions was shifted from a synergistic relationship in 2000-2005 to a trade-off relationship in 2015-2018. (2) Spatially, the production-living function was dominated by strong trade-off and production-weakening trade-off, where the trade-off intensity tended to weaken from the east to the west and from the central to the periphery. The areas with a synergy state were located in the low-altitude mountain of central and western Hangzhou. The production-ecological function presented a mixed pattern of trade-off and synergy areas in space. The trade-off areas accounted for about 31%, with the weak trade-off and production-weakening trade-offs, mainly distributed in northern and eastern Hangzhou. The synergy areas occupied about 38%, with the weak synergy and simultaneous improving synergy, mainly distributed in the western and southern Hangzhou. The living-ecological function was dominated by the weak trade-off and ecology-weakening trade-off. The trade-off area accounts for 14%, where the trade-off intensity showed a trend of high in the east and low in the west, gradually decreasing from the center to the edge. The synergy relationship was dominated by weak synergy and simultaneous weakening synergy, the synergy areas accounted for 8%, mainly scattered in the outer suburbs. (3) Natural conditions and geographical location posed significant negative effects on the trade-offs/synergies in production-living and living-ecological functions, whereas there were significant positive effects on production-ecological function trade-offs/synergies. The urbanization-induced land conversion and the increase of land-use intensity further aggravated the trade-offs in land use functions. Therefore, there were different trade-offs/synergies in the land use functions at global and grid scales. The overall characteristics and local differences can be fully considered in the decision-making on land use function, according to the local conditions.
- land use,
- function,
- trade-off and synergy,
- spatio-temporal difference,
- influencing factors,
- Hangzhou City

FullText(HTML)

References (36)

References

[1]	Wiggering H, Dalchow C, Glemnitz M, et al. Indicators for multifunctional land use: Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2006, 6(1): 238-249.
[2]	陈睿山，蔡运龙，严祥，等. 土地系统功能及其可持续性评价[J]. 中国土地科学，2011，25(1)：8-15.Chen Ruishan, Cai Yunlong, Yan Xiang, et al. The functions of land system and its sustainability assessment[J]. China Land Science, 2011, 25(1): 8-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	Nilsson M, Griggs D, Visbeck M. Map the interactions between sustainable development goals[J]. Nature, 2016, 534(7607): 320-322.
[4]	Liu Y S, Fang F, Li Y H. Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 40: 6-12.
[5]	王亚飞，郭锐，樊杰. 国土空间结构演变解析与主体功能区格局优化思路[J]. 中国科学院院刊，2020，35(7)：855-866.Wang Yafei, Guo Rui, Fan Jie. Evolution analysis of China's spatial development structure and pattern optimization of major function zones[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(7): 855-866. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Verburg P H, Steeg J, Veldkamp A, et al. From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(3): 1327-1335.
[7]	Pérez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, et al. Land use functions: A multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability[M]//Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes. Springer: Berlin, 2008: 375-404.
[8]	刘超，许月卿，刘焱序，等. 基于系统论的土地利用多功能分类及评价指标体系研究[J]. 北京大学学报，2018，54(1)：181-188.Liu Chao, Xu Yueqing, Liu Yanxu, et al. Research on land use functions classification and evaluation system based on system theory[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2018, 54(1): 181-188. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Paracchini M L, Pacini C, Jones M L, et al. An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2011, 11(1): 71-80.
[10]	冀正欣，刘超，许月卿，等. 基于土地利用功能测度的"三生"空间识别与优化调控[J]. 农业工程学报，2020，36(18)：222-231.Ji Zhengxin, Liu Chao, Xu Yueqing, et al. Identification and optimal regulation of the production-living-ecological space based on quantitative land use functions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(18): 222-231. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Zou L L, Liu Y S, Yang J X, et al. Quantitative identification and spatial analysis of land use ecological-production-living functions in rural areas on China's southeast coast[J]. Habitat International, 2020, 100: 102182.
[12]	Fan Y T, Jin X B, Gan L, et al. Spatial identification and dynamic analysis of land use functions reveals distinct zones of multiple functions in eastern China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 642: 33-44.
[13]	Zhang Y N, Long H L, Tu S S, et al. Spatial identification of land use functions and their trade-offs/synergies in China: Implications for sustainable land management[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 107: 105550.
[14]	Lyu Y F, Wang M J, Zou Y N, et al. Mapping trade-offs among urban fringe land use functions to accurately support spatial planning[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 802: 149915.
[15]	康庆，郭青霞，丁一，等. 山西省"三生"功能协同/权衡关系分析[J]. 自然资源学报，2021，36(5)：1195-1207.Kang Qing, Guo Qingxia, Ding Yi, et al. Tradeoffs/synergies analysis of "Production-Living-Ecological" functions in Shanxi province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(5): 1195-1207. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	刘愿理，廖和平，李涛，等. 山区土地利用多功能时空分异特征及影响因素分析[J]. 农业工程学报，2019，35(21)：271-279.Liu Yuanli, Liao Heping, Li Tao, et al. Spatio-temporal diversity and influencing factors of multi-functionality of land use in mountainous regions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(21): 271-279. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	Liu C, Xu Y Q, Huang A, et al. Spatial identification of land use multifunctionality at grid scale in farming-pastoral area: A case study of Zhangjiakou City, China[J]. Habitat International, 2018, 76: 48-61.
[18]	张永蕾，栾乔林，熊昌盛，等. 基于多源空间数据的"三生"空间异质性评价与分区划定[J]. 农业工程学报，2021，37(10)：214-223.Zhang Yonglei, Luan Qiaolin, Xiong Changsheng, et al. Spatial heterogeneity evaluation and zoning of production-living-ecological space based on multi-source spatial data[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2021, 37(10): 214-223. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	刘超，许月卿，卢新海. 生态脆弱区土地利用多功能权衡/协同格局演变与优化分区：以张家口市为例[J]. 经济地理，2021，41(1)：181-190.Liu Chao, Xu Yueqin, Lu Xinhai. Spatio-temporal evolution and optimization regionalization of trade: off and synergy of land use functions in ecologically fragile and poverty areas: A case study of Zhangjiakou City[J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(1): 181-190. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	Rallings A M, Smukler S M, Gergel S E, et al. Towards multifunctional land use in an agricultural landscape: A trade-off and synergy analysis in the Lower Fraser Valley, Canada[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019, 184: 88-100.
[21]	Cord A F, Bartkowski B, Beckmann M, et al. Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 28: 264-272.
[22]	Liu C, Xu Y Q, Lu X H, et al. Trade-offs and driving forces of land use functions in ecologically fragile areas of northern Hebei Province: Spatiotemporal analysis[J]. Land Use Policy, 2021, 104: 105387.
[23]	Meng J J, Cheng H R, Li F, et al. Spatial-temporal trade-offs of land multi-functionality and function zoning at finer township scale in the middle reaches of the Heihe River[J]. Land Use Policy, 2022, 115: 106019.
[24]	范业婷，金晓斌，项晓敏，等. 江苏省土地利用功能变化及其空间格局特征[J]. 地理研究，2019，38(2)：383-398.Fan Yeting, Jin Xiaobin, Xiang Xiaomin, et al. Land use functions change and its spatial pattern in Jiangsu province from 2000 to 2015[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(2): 383-398. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	Zheng Q M, Huang L, Wang K, et al. A new source of multi-spectral high spatial resolution night-time light imagery-JL1-3B[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, 215: 300-312.
[26]	Li B J, Chen D X, Wu S H, et al. Spatio-temporal assessment of urbanization impacts on ecosystem services: Case study of Nanjing City, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 71: 416-427.
[27]	蒙吉军，王祺，李枫，等. 基于空间差异的黑河中游土地多功能利用研究[J]. 地理研究，2019，38(2)：369-382.Meng Jijun, Wang Qi, Li Feng, et al. Assessing multifunctional land use in the middle reach of the Heihe River basin based on spatial variances[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(2): 369-382. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	Zhu C M, Zhang X L, Zhou M M, et al. Impacts of urbanization and landscape pattern on habitat quality using OLS and GWR models in Hangzhou, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 117: 106654.
[29]	吴丹，邹长新，林乃峰，等．长江经济带坡面土壤保持服务功能时空格局及其变化特征[J]. 水土保持通报，2018，38(5)：144-148.Wu Dan, Zou Changxin, Lin Naifeng, et al. Temporal and spatial variations of soil conservation service function in Yangtze River economic belt[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 38(5): 144-148. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	Cao Y, Cao Y, Li G, et al. Linking ecosystem services trade-offs, bundles and hotspot identification with cropland management in the coastal Hangzhou Bay area of China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 97: 104689.
[31]	王枫，董玉祥. 广州市土地利用多功能的空间差异及影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学，2015，37(11)：2179-2192.Wang Feng, Dong Yuxiang. Spatial differences and influencing factors of land use function in Guangzhou[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(11): 2179-2192. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	Caroline H, Helen S, Bhaskar V, et al. Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 28: 263-275.
[33]	王鹏涛，张立伟，李英杰，等. 汉江上游生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J]. 地理学报，2017，72(11)：2064-2078.Wang Pengtao, Zhang Liwei, Li Yingjie, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics of the trade-off and synergy relationships among multiple ecosystem services in the Upper Reaches of Hanjiang River Basin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(11): 2064-2078. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	Zhu C M, Dong B Y, Li S N, et al. Identifying the trade-offs and synergies among land use functions and their influencing factors from a geospatial perspective: A case study in Hangzhou, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 314: 128026.
[35]	Fan Y T, Gan L, Hong C Q, et al. Spatial identification and determinants of trade-offs among multiple land use functions in Jiangsu Province, China[J]. Science of the total Environment, 2021, 772: 145022.
[36]	梁明，聂拼，陆胤昊，等. 淮南市土地利用程度变化过程的时空演化特征[J]. 农业工程学报，2019，35(22)：99-106.Liang Ming, Nie Pin, Lu Yinhao, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of land use intensity change process of Huainan[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(22): 99-106. (in Chinese with English abstract)