Determination of the rigid and flexible space for cropland control under the perspective of conflict of “three lines” of territorial space

NIU Shuai; HU Yecui; CHEN Xingxin; GAO Mengwen

doi:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202403189

Volume 40 Issue 13

Jun. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE) > 2024 > 40(13): 222-232. > DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202403189

NIU Shuai, HU Yecui, CHEN Xingxin, et al. Determination of the rigid and flexible space for cropland control under the perspective of conflict of “three lines” of territorial space[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2024, 40(13): 222-232. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202403189

Citation:

PDF (2424 KB)

Determination of the rigid and flexible space for cropland control under the perspective of conflict of “three lines” of territorial space

1.
School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geoscience, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China

More Information

Received Date: March 25, 2024
Revised Date: April 26, 2024
Available Online: June 25, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Cultivated land has been one of the most vital resources and environmental elements for the human survival. However, the purely administrative rigid control cannot effectively meet the needs of urban and rural residents for the multiple functions of cultivated land. It is a high demand to coordinate the conflict between the “three lines” of territorial space and the multi-functionality of cultivated land. In this study, the control zones of cultivated land were constructed to complement the rigid control and flexible guidance, in order to realize the efficient and multi-functional use of cultivated land resources. The example was taken as Guangxi Hechi municipal jurisdiction. Firstly, the LESA system was applied to evaluate the level of regional quality of cultivated land, in order to preliminarily obtain the permanent basic and general farmland zones; The circuit resistance theory and the least cost path (LCP) model were selected to construct the ecological security pattern, in order to delineate the ecological protection red line; The construction land expansion was analyzed using the Geo-detector model. The urban development boundary was obtained from the dynamic simulation of the land use situation in 2035 using the Mixed Compartmental Cellular Automata (MCCA) model. Four scenarios were identified under the “three lines” conflict area after basic evaluation. The amendment rules were formulated to classify the cultivated land. The results show that: 1) The overall quality of cultivated land was at a medium-low level, most of which were II, IV and V levels. The area of permanent basic farmland was initially delineated to be 795.46 km², according to the threshold effect; 2) The preliminary delineation of permanent basic farmland was in the serious conflict with the ecological protection red line and the urban development boundary, with an area of 212.39 km². The conflicting areas were optimized to ultimately obtain a reasonable permanent basic farmland area (i.e., rigid control area); 3) The general farmland outside the rigid spatial scope was amended for the flexible guidance zone. Three kinds of multi-functional zones of cultivated land were coupled within the spatial scope (production-ecological, production-livelihood and ecological-ecological-livelihood compound utilization zone). In view of different control zones, the control idea of “rigid and flexible” was proposed for the cultivated land system. Differentiated control measures were emphasized in use control, such as “what can't be done”, “what can be done” and “how can be done”. The rigid and flexible zoning of cultivated land was greatly contributed to the Hechi municipal jurisdiction. More refined management of cultivated land was formulated to implement the multifunctional and sustainable use of cultivated land. In conclusion, the rigid and flexible spatial delineation of cultivated land can accurately support the effective implementation of spatial planning, in order to realize the win-win situation of territorial spatial planning and the protection of cultivated land resources.
- land use,
- cultivated land systems,
- rigid and flexible space,
- "three lines",
- territorial spatial planning,
- multi-functionality of cultivated land,
- Karst areas

FullText(HTML)

References (42)

References

[1]	CHEN L L, ZHAO H S, SONG G, et al. Optimization of cultivated land pattern for achieving cultivated land system security: A case study in Heilongjiang Province, China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2021, 108(7): 105589.
[2]	张义博. 新时期中国粮食安全形势与政策建议[J]. 宏观经济研究,2020(3):57-66. ZHANG Yibo. China's food security situation and policy recommendations in the new era [J]. Macroeconomics, 2020(3): 57-66, 81. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	ZHOU T, TAN R, SHU XF. Rigidity with partial elasticity: Local government adaptation under the centralized land quota system in China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2022, 118(3): 106138.
[4]	杨智慧,路欣怡,孔祥斌,等. 中国耕地刚性管制与弹性调控框架构建[J]. 中国土地科学,2021,35(6):11-19. YANG Zhihui, LU Xinyi, KONG Xiangbin, et al. Construction of China^’s rigid control and resilient adjustment of cultivated land protection[J]. China Land Science, 2021, 35(6): 11-19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	谢高地,成升魁,肖玉,等. 新时期中国粮食供需平衡态势及粮食安全观的重构[J]. 自然资源学报,2017,32(6):895-903. XIE Gaodi, CHENG Shengkui, XIAO Yu, et al. The balance between grain supply and demand and the reconstruction of China's food security strategy in the new period [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(6): 895-903. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	宋敏,张安录. 大食物观视阈下的耕地利用转型:现实挑战、理论逻辑与实现路径[J]. 中国土地科学,2023,37(8):31-41. SONG Min, ZHANG Anlu. Cultivated land use transition from the “Greater Food” perspective: Realistic challenges, theoretical logic and implementation paths[J]. China Land Science, 2023, 37(8): 31-41. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	熊昌盛,张永蕾,王雅娟,等. 中国耕地多功能评价及分区管控[J]. 中国土地科学,2021,35(10):104-114. XIONG Changsheng, ZHANG Yonglei, WANG Yajuan, et al. Multi-function evaluation and zoning control of cultivated land in China[J]. China Land Science, 2021,35(10): 104-114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	罗莎莎,赖庆标,王旭东,等. 基于多功能评价与权衡-协同关系的福建省耕地区划管控[J]. 农业工程学报,2023,39(13):271-280. LUO Shasha, LAI Qingbiao, WANG Xudong, et al. Control and management of cropland regionalization in Fujian Province of China using multi-functional evaluation and trade-off/synergy relationships [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2023, 39(13): 271-280. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	赵越,罗志军,曹丽萍,等. 基于空间决策的区域城镇发展与农业生产协调布局优化:以江西省临川区为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2019,34(3):526-538. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190307 ZHAO Yue, LUO Zhijun, CAO Liping, et al. Layout optimization of regional urban development and agricultural production based on spatial decision-making: A case study of Linchuan district in Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(3): 526-538. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190307
[10]	钱家乘,师诺,赵华甫,等. 中国耕地弹性管控的理论解析与研究框架:从单一目标权衡到多目标协同[J]. 中国土地科学,2023,37(3):38-47. QIAN Jiacheng, SHI Nuo, ZHAO Huafu, et al. Theoretical analysis and research framework of resilience management of cultivated land in China: From single-objective trade-offs to multi-objective synergy[J]. China Land Science, 2023,37(3): 38-47. (in Chinese with English abstract))
[11]	SU M, GUO RZ, HONG WY. Institutional transition and implementation path for cultivated land protection in highly urbanized regions: A case study of Shenzhen, China.[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 181: 493-501.
[12]	刘婉莹,宋戈,高佳,等. 下辽河平原典型地域耕地系统弹性时空分异特征[J]. 农业工程学报,2023,39(9):252-260. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202211081 LIU Wanying, SONG Ge, GAO Jia, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation of arable land system resilience in the typical areas of Lower Liaohe Plain of China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2023, 39(9): 252-260. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202211081
[13]	HOLLING C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 14(1): 1-23.
[14]	吕晓,王亚男,王柏源. 韧性理论视角下耕地利用与保护的若干思考[J]. 中国土地,2022,436(5):16-19. LYu Xiao, WANG Yan’an, WANG Baiyuan. Some thoughts on cultivated land utilization and protection from the perspective of resilience theory[J]. China Land, 2022, 436(5): 16-19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	梁鑫源,金晓斌,孙瑞,等. 多情景粮食安全底线约束下的中国耕地保护弹性空间[J]. 地理学报,2022,77(3):697-713. LIANG Xinyuan, JIN Xiaobin, SUN Rui, et al. China's resilience-space for cultivated land protection under the restraint of multi-scenario food security bottom line[J]. Journal of Geography, 2022,77(3): 697-713. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	李鑫,严思齐,肖长江. 不确定条件下土地资源空间优化的弹性空间划定[J]. 农业工程学报,2016,32(16):241-247. LI Xin, YAN Siqi, XIAO Changjiang. Determination of flexible space for land resource spatial optimization under uncertain conditions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(16): 241-247. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	MIAO X R, LI Z H, WANG M Y, et al. Measurement of cultivated land ecosystem resilience in black soil region of Northeast China under the background of cultivated land protection policy in China: A case study of Qiqihar city[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 434: 140141. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140141
[18]	DANG Y X, ZHAO Z T, KONG X B, et al. Discerning the process of cultivated land governance transition in China since the reform and opening-up-- Based on the multiple streams framework[J]. Land Use Policy, 2023, 133: 106844.
[19]	LIANG X Y, JIN X B, HAN B, et al. China’s food security situation and key questions in the new era: A perspective of farmland protection[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2022,(6): 1001-1019.
[20]	吴宇哲,许智钇. 休养生息制度背景下的耕地保护转型研究[J]. 资源科学,2019,41(1):9-22. WU Yuzhe, XU Zhiyi. Study on the transformation of cropland protection under the background of rehabilitation system[J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(1): 9-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	FOLBERTH C, KHABAROV N, BALKOVIČ J, et al. The global cropland-sparing potential of high-yield farming[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3(4): 281-289. doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-0505-x
[22]	TAO J Y, LU Y Q, GE D Z, et al. The spatial pattern of agricultural ecosystem services from the production-living-ecology perspective: A case study of the Huaihai Economic Zone, China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2022, 122: 106355. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106355
[23]	LIU J, JIN X B, XU W Y, et al. Assessing trade-offs and synergies among multiple land use functional efficiencies: Integrating ideal reference and key indicators for sustainable landscape management[J]. Applied Geography, 2023, 158: 103037. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103037
[24]	赵华甫,屈雪冰,冯新伟,等. 耕地的弹性变形理论及实证研究[J]. 地域研究与开发,2012,31(2):73-77. ZHAO Huafu, QU Xuebing, FENG Xinwei, et al. The resilience deformation theory of cultivated land and its empirical research[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2012, 31(2): 73-77. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	宋小青,欧阳竹. 中国耕地多功能管理的实践路径探讨[J]. 自然资源学报,2012,27(4):540-551. SONG Xiaoqing, OUYANG Zhu. Route of multifunctional cultivated land management in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(4): 540-551. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	辜寄蓉,朱明仓,江浏光艳,等. 国土空间规划中弹性空间的作用与划分[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(12):39-47. GU Jirong, ZHU Mingcang, JIANG Liuguangyan, et al. The effect and dividing of flexible space in territory spatial planning. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning[J], 2019, 40(12): 39-47. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	李思楠,赵筱青,普军伟,等. 西南喀斯特典型区国土空间地域功能优化分区[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(17):242-253. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.17.029 LI Sinan, ZHAO Xiaoqing, PU Junwei, et al. Optimization of regionalization of territorial space function regions in typical karst areas of southwest China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(17): 242-253. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.17.029
[28]	陈文广,张青璞,孔祥斌,等. 基于“三线”统筹的省域永久基本农田布局优化规则与实证研究[J]. 农业工程学报,2021,37(15):248-257. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.15.030 CHEN Wenguang, ZHANG Qingpu, KONG Xiangbin, et al. Optimizing rules and empirical research of provincial permanent basic farmland layout based on the “Three-Line” coordination[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2021, 37(15): 248-257. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.15.030
[29]	韩述,郭贯成,史洋洋,等. 基于国土空间“三线”划定与耕地质量自相关的耕地空间布局优化[J]. 农业工程学报,2022,38(19):237-248. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.19.026 HAN Shu, GUO Guancheng, SHI Yangyang, et al. Optimization of the spatial layout of arable land protection using “Three Lines” delineation of territorial spatial planning and spatial autocorrelation attributes of arable land quality[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(19): 237-248. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.19.026
[30]	刘希朝,李效顺,蒋冬梅,等. 基于适度边界的“三线”冲突融合研究 ——以徐州市为例[J]. 中国土地科学,2021,35(7):7-16. LIU Xizhao, LI Xiaoshun, JIANG Dongmei, et al. Conflict fusion of “Three Lines” based on moderate boundary: A case study of Xuzhou city [J]. China Land Science, 2021,35(7): 7-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	冉娜,金晓斌,范业婷,等. 基于土地利用冲突识别与协调的“三线”划定方法研究——以常州市金坛区为例[J]. 资源科学,2018,40(2):284-298. RAN Na, JIN Xiaobin, FAN Yeting, et al. “Three Lines” delineation based on land use conflict identification and coordination in Jintan District, Changzhou[J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(2): 284-298. (in Chinese with English abstract))
[32]	ZHU Y Y, WANG Z W, ZHU X H. New reflections on food security and land use strategies based on the evolution of Chinese dietary patterns[J]. Land Use Policy, 2023, 126: 106520. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106520
[33]	王韵秋,胡业翠,高梦雯,等. 多维视角下广西喀斯特石漠化地区国土空间生态修复分区[J]. 农业工程学报,2023,39(1):223-231. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202210065 WANG Yunqiu, HU Yecui, GAO Mengwen, et al. Land-space ecological restoration zoning of karst rocky desertification areas in Guangxi from multi-dimensional perspectives[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2023, 39(1): 223-231. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202210065
[34]	CHEN Y M, YAO M R, ZHAO Q Q, et al. Delineation of a basic farmland protection zone based on spatial connectivity and comprehensive quality evaluation: A case study of Changsha City, China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 101: 105145.
[35]	钱凤魁,张琳琳,贾璐,等. 基本农田划定中的耕地立地条件评价研究[J]. 自然资源学报,2016,31(3):447-456. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20150218 QIAN Fengkui, ZHANG Linlin, JIA Lu, et al. Site condition assessment during prime farmland demarcating[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(3): 447-456. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20150218
[36]	钱凤魁,项子璇,王贺兴,等. 基于最小数据集与LESA体系的县域耕地质量评价[J]. 农业工程学报,2023,39(8):239-248. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202210249 QIAN Fengkui, XIANG Zixuan, WANG Hexing, et al. Evaluating cultivated land quality in county territory using the minimum data set, land evaluation and site assessment (LESA)[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2023, 39(8): 239-248. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202210249
[37]	丁雨賝,冯长春,王利伟. 山地区域土地生态红线划定方法与实证研究——以重庆市涪陵区义和镇为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2016,35(7):851-859. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.07.006 DING Yuchen, FENG Changchun, WANG Liwei. Determination of ecological red line of mountainous areas: A case study of Yihe town in Chongqing municipality[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(7): 851-859. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.07.006
[38]	高梦雯,胡业翠,李向,等. 基于生态系统服务重要性和环境敏感性的喀斯特山区生态安全格局构建 ——以广西河池为例[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(7):2596-2608. GAO Mengwen, HU Yecui, LI Xiang, et al. Construction of ecological security pattern based on the importance of ecosystem services and environmental sensitivity in karst mountainous areas: A case study in Hechi, Guangxi[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(7): 2596-2608. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	GAO Z Q, TAO F, WANG Y H, et al. Potential ecological risk assessment of land use structure based on MCCA model: A case study in Yangtze River Delta Region, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 155: 110931. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110931
[40]	ZHAO Z J, FAN B L, ZHOU Q B, et al. Simulating the coupling of rural settlement expansion and population growth in Deqing, Zhejiang Province, based on MCCA modeling[J]. Land, 2022, 11(1975): 1975.
[41]	岳文泽,王田雨,甄延临. “三区三线”为核心的统一国土空间用途管制分区[J]. 中国土地科学,2020,34(5):52-59. YUE Wenze, WANG Tianyu, ZHEN Yanlin. Unified zoning of territorial space use control derived from the core concept of “Three Types of Spatial Zones and Alert-lines”[J]. China Land Science, 2020,34(5): 52-59. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[42]	胡林影,郭杰,欧名豪,等. 耕地系统保护的“刚性—弹性—韧性”:理论框架与实施路径[J]. 规划师,2023,39(11):7-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2023.11.002 HU Linying, GUO Jie, OU Minghao, et al. The “rigidity-elasticity-resilience” of systematic farmland protection: Theoretical framework and implementation path[J]. Planners, 2023, 39(11): 7-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2023.11.002

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

1.	肖顺武，宁君阳. 耕地种植用途管控制度研究——基于《粮食安全保障法》相关规定的解析. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2024(06): 110-122 .
2.	刘愿理，姚焱，汪蕊，许亚茜. 生态脆弱区乡村聚落时空格局演化特征与影响因素研究. 农业工程学报. 2024(20): 219-229 . 本站查看
3.	佘艳. 新时期下建立我国粮食安全和耕地保护党政同责制度的思考. 中国土地. 2024(11): 38-41 .
4.	孙玉杰，颜广东，邹元，丁忠义. “非粮化”背景下潜在耕地的空间管控研究——以江阴市为例. 上海国土资源. 2024(04): 53-60 .