• EI
    • CSA
    • CABI
    • 卓越期刊
    • CA
    • Scopus
    • CSCD
    • 核心期刊
YAO Dunxue, SHI Luyi, SHEN Shiming, et al. Integrated bio-methanol cracking hydrogen production system and its life cycle assessment[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2025, 41(6): 247-258. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202408174
Citation: YAO Dunxue, SHI Luyi, SHEN Shiming, et al. Integrated bio-methanol cracking hydrogen production system and its life cycle assessment[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2025, 41(6): 247-258. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202408174

Integrated bio-methanol cracking hydrogen production system and its life cycle assessment

More Information
  • Received Date: December 17, 2024
  • Revised Date: February 04, 2025
  • Available Online: February 27, 2025
  • Hydrogen energy can play a pivotal role in the energy transition and sustainable development. It is very urgent to optimize the energy structures and transition industries toward low-carbon solutions in recent years, particularly in the pursuit of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. Fortunately, bio-methanol cracking hydrogen production can be expected to offer cost-effectiveness and scalability among the emerging technologies. However, it is still lacking in the environmental impact and economic assessment. In this study, a systematic quantitative assessment was conducted on the environmental impacts at each stage of the life lifecycle. A dynamic economic evaluation was also coupled for the decision-making and strategic deployment of bio-methanol cracking hydrogen production. A case study was selected as the medium-sized plant of methanol cracking hydrogen production in Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, China. A comprehensive evaluation of the integrated system was selected to facilitate the environmental and economic performance. A life cycle model was developed to assess the environmental impacts. The potentials of environmental impacts were then calculated at each stage. Furthermore, some indicators were determined after economic evaluation, in order to balance the overall environmental footprint and the economic feasibility of the system. The results indicated that the hydrogen production stage contributed to the most significant environmental impacts, accounting for over 70% of categories, such as acidification potential (AP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP), and human toxicity potential (HTP). Notably, the HTP category was accounted for as much as 90.47%. The methanol production and transportation stages were also identified as substantial contributors to the environmental impacts. The ADP, HTP, and global warming potential (GWP) contributed the most to the overall environmental impact. While the least contribution was from the ozone depletion potential (ODP). Sensitivity analysis showed that the effective strategies greatly contributed to the minimum fuel consumption during methanol transportation. Negative environmental impacts were then mitigated to reduce the electricity usage in hydrogen production. The carbon emissions of the life cycle varied between 0.71 and 12.18 kg/kg , depending on the stage and scenario. Among the contributing factors, the bio-methanol production mode shared the most significant influence on the carbon emissions of the life cycle. Hydrogen energy was also used to reduce the emissions during methanol transportation. The costs of the integrated system were composed of the raw materials expenses, fixed capital investment, as well as operation and maintenance costs. While its revenue primarily stemmed from the hydrogen fuel sales. The economic indicators were obtained, with a payback period (PBP) of 12.16 years, a net present value (NPV) of 2.118 7 million yuan, and an internal rate of return (IRR) of 13%. Strong profitability, liquidity, and favorable economic performance were achieved in the bio-methanol cracking hydrogen production. Key influencing factors on the economic feasibility included raw material costs, carbon pricing, and hydrogen energy prices. The NPV ranged from -5.68×107 to 8.64×107 CNY in the various scenarios. Particularly, the economic competitiveness of the system was significantly enhanced in the scenarios with the higher hydrogen energy and carbon prices. The hydrogen energy prices enhanced the revenue potential of the system. While the higher carbon pricing also provided strong economic incentives for low-carbon technologies, further improving its financial viability.

  • [1]
    BALIBAR S. Energy transitions after COP21 and 22[J]. Comptes Rendus Physique, 2017, 18(7/8): 479-487.
    [2]
    OBERSTEINER M, BEDNAR J, WAGNER F, et al. How to spend a dwindling greenhouse gas budget[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8: 7-10. doi: 10.1038/s41558-017-0045-1
    [3]
    NUNES P, OLIVEIRA F, HAMACHER S, et al. Design of a hydrogen supply chain with uncertainty[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(46): 16408-16418. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.10.015
    [4]
    ANANDARAJAH G, MCDOWALL W, EKINS P. Decarbonising road transport with hydrogen and electricity: Long term global technology learning scenarios[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(8): 3419-3432. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.110
    [5]
    AZIZ M, WIJAYANTA A, NANDIYANTO A. Ammonia as effective hydrogen storage: A review on production, storage and utilization[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(12): 3062. doi: 10.3390/en13123062
    [6]
    SCHORN F, BREUER J, SAMSUN R, et al. Methanol as a renewable energy carrier: An assessment of production and transportation costs for selected global locations[J]. Advances in Applied Energy, 2021, 3(12): 100050.
    [7]
    国家发展改革委. 氢能产业发展中长期规划(2021-2035)[R]. 北京,2022.
    [8]
    BALCOMBE P, SPEIRS J, JOHNSON E, et al. The carbon credentials of hydrogen gas networks and supply chains[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 91: 1077-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.089
    [9]
    宋东新,王世乐,苗剑,等. 可再生能源制氢技术经济性探讨及成本分析[J]. 中外能源,2023,28(11):24-29.

    SONG Dongxin, WANG Shile, MIAO Jian, et al. Economics and cost analysis of technologies for hydrogen production from renewable energy[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2023, 28(11): 24-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [10]
    刘铉东,张颖超,栾学斌,等. 天然气水蒸气重整制氢技术的能耗及成本分析[J]. 石油炼制与化工,2023,54(7):105-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2399.2023.07.020

    LIU Xuandong, ZHANG Yingchao, LUAN Xuebin, et al. Energy consumption and cost analysis of hydrogen production by steam reforming og natural gas[J]. Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, 2023, 54(7): 105-112. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2399.2023.07.020
    [11]
    秦建中,张元东. 甲醇裂解制氢工艺与优势分析[J]. 玻璃,2004,31(5):29-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1987.2004.05.006

    QIN Jianzhong, ZHANG Yuandong. Methanol cracking to hydrogen process and advantage analysis[J]. Glass, 2004, 31(5): 29-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1987.2004.05.006
    [12]
    李雅欣,何阳东,刘韬,等. 甲烷裂解制氢工艺研究进展及技术经济性对比分析[J]. 石油与天然气化工,2022,51(3):38-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3426.2022.03.007

    LI Yaxin, HE Yangdong, LIU Tao, et al. Research progress and comparative techno-economic analysis of methane pyrolysis technology for hydrogen production[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2022, 51(3): 38-46. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3426.2022.03.007
    [13]
    陈馨. 典型制氢工艺生命周期碳排放对比研究[J]. 当代石油石化,2023,31(1):19-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6809.2023.01.005

    CHEN Xin. Comparative study on life-cycle carbon emissions of typical hydrogen production[J]. Petroleum & Petrochemical Today, 2023, 31(1): 19-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6809.2023.01.005
    [14]
    赵培轩,刘慧敏,潘启成,等. 盐碱地高盐废水电解脱氯同步制氢特性[J]. 农业工程学报,2022,38(22):166-171. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.22.018

    ZHAO Peixuan, LIU Huimin, PAN Qicheng, et al. H2/Cl2 production performance of wastewater electrolysis from saline-alkali land treatment[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(22): 166-171. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.22.018
    [15]
    徐功迅,陈伟,方真. 生物质超临界水制氢研究进展[J]. 农业工程学报,2023,39(7):24-35. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202301053

    XU Gongxun, CHEN Wei, FANG Zhen. Research progress of supercritical water hydrogen production from biomass[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2023, 39(7): 24-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202301053
    [16]
    PALONE O, HOXHA A, GAGLIARDI G, et al. Synthesis of methanol from a chemical looping syngas for the decarbonization of the power sector[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2023, 145(2): 021018. doi: 10.1115/1.4055356
    [17]
    KHAN S, JAIN G, SRIVASTAVA A, et al. Enzymatic biomethanol production: Future perspective[J]. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 2023, 38: e00729. doi: 10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00729
    [18]
    PALO D, DAGLE R, HOLLADAY J. Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2007, 107(10): 3992-4021. doi: 10.1021/cr050198b
    [19]
    黄粉莲,佘超杰,万明定,等. 不同海拔条件下甲醇替代率和主喷正时对甲醇/柴油RCCI发动机性能的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2024,40(5):1-11.

    HUANG Fenlian, SHE Chaojie, WAN Mingding, et al. Effects of methanol ratio and main injection timing on performances of a methanol-diesel RCCI engine at different altitudes[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2024, 40(5): 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [20]
    International Organization for Standardization. Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Principles and framework: ISO 14040-2006[S]. Switzerland: International Standards Organization, 2006.
    [21]
    李冬冬,田培雨,孙莹莹,等. 华北地区蛋鸡养殖产业碳排放核算[J]. 农业工程学报,2024,40(12):193-201.

    LI Dongdong, TIAN Peiyu, SUN Yingying, et al. Accounting carbon emission in the layer breeding industry of North China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2024, 40(12): 193-201. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [22]
    FINNVEDEN G, HAUSCHILD M, EKVALL T, et al. Recent developments in life cycle assessment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 91(1): 1-21.
    [23]
    ZHANG J, LING B, HE Y, et al. Life cycle assessment of three types of hydrogen production methods using solar energy[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(30): 14158-14168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.150
    [24]
    陈轶嵩,丁振森,王文君,等. 氢燃料电池汽车不同制氢方案的全生命周期评价及情景模拟研究[J]. 中国公路学报,2019,32(5):172-180.

    CHEN Yisong, DING Zhensen, WANG Wenjun, et al. Life-cycle assessment and scenario simulation of four hydrogen production schemes for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(5): 172-180. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [25]
    JIANG T, WEI Y, LIU X, et al. Life cycle analysis and power optimization of three typical hydrogen supply chains[J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2023, 25(8): 2561-2581. doi: 10.1007/s10098-023-02595-z
    [26]
    马国杰,朱琳影,张苗苗,等. 秸秆沼气化发电技术生命周期评估及经济分析[J]. 农业工程学报,2022,38(24):162-168.

    MA Guojie, ZHU Linying, ZHANG Miaomiao, et al. Life cycle assessment and economic analysis of straw biogasification power generation technology[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(24): 162-168. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [27]
    王雪雪,朱文. 甲醇裂解制氢工艺与优势研究[J]. 化工管理,2021,27:93-94.

    WANG Xuexue, ZHU Wen. Study on process and advantages of hydrogen production from methanol pyrolysis[J]. Chemical Engineering Management, 2021, 27: 93-94. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [28]
    王周. 天然气制氢、甲醇制氢与水电解制氢的经济性对比探讨[J]. 天然气技术与经济,2016,10(6):47-49.

    WANG Zhou. Discussion on economic comparison of hydrogen production by natural gas, methanol and water electrolysis[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2016, 10(6): 47-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [29]
    LI J, ZHU X, DJILALI N, et al. Comparative well-to-pump assessment of fueling pathways for zero-carbon transportation in China: Hydrogen economy or methanol economy?[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 169: 112935. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112935
    [30]
    杨晴. 新能源技术经济学[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2018:114-139.
    [31]
    SUN Y, DENG A, YANG Q, et al. The future of coal-fired power plants in China to retrofit with biomass and CCS: A plant-centered assessment framework considering land competition[J]. Applied Energy, 2025, 377: 124547. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124547
    [32]
    韩菲. 生物质热解多联产系统生态热力学评价研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学,2015.

    HAN Fei. Ecological Thermodynamics Assessment of Biomass Pyrolytic Polygeneration System[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [33]
    YADAV P, ATHANASSIADIS D, YACOUT D, et al. Environmental impact and environmental cost assessment of methanol production from wood biomass[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 265: 114990. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114990
    [34]
    CARVALHO L, FURUSJö E, MA C, et al. Alkali enhanced biomass gasification with in situ S capture and a novel syngas cleaning. Part 2: Techno-economic assessment[J]. Energy, 2018, 165: 471-482. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.159
    [35]
    FURUSJö E, MA C, JI X, et al. Alkali enhanced biomass gasification with in situ S capture and novel syngas cleaning. Part 1: Gasifier performance[J]. Energy, 2018, 157: 96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.097
    [36]
    GUINÉE J, GORÉE M, HEIJUNGS R, et al. Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7(5): 311-313. doi: 10.1007/BF02978897
    [37]
    中国氢能联盟. 低碳氢、清洁氢与可再生能源氢的标准与评价:T/ CAB 0078—2020[S]. 北京:中国产学研合作促进会,2020.
    [38]
    KHOO H, Ee W, ISONI V. Bio-chemicals from lignocellulose feedstock: Sustainability, LCA and the green conundrum[J]. Green Chemistry, 2016, 18: 1912-1922. doi: 10.1039/C5GC02065D
    [39]
    SHEETS J, SHAH A. Techno-economic comparison of biogas cleaning for grid injection, compressed natural gas, and biogas-to-methanol conversion technologies[J]. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2018, 12(3): 412-425. doi: 10.1002/bbb.1848
    [40]
    MOGHADDAM E, AHLGREN S, HULTEBERG C, et al. Energy balance and global warming potential of biogas-based fuels from a life cycle perspective[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 132: 74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.12.014
    [41]
    MIOTTI M, HOFER J, BAUER C. Integrated environmental and economic assessment of current and future fuel cell vehicles[J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22: 94-110. doi: 10.1007/s11367-015-0986-4
    [42]
    夏磊. 中国绿色甲醇技术与项目报告2024[EB/OL]. 2024-04-08[2024-05-09]. https://asiachem.org/HFC.
    [43]
    张佩兰,郑黎. 工业制氢技术及经济性分析[J]. 山西化工,2014,34(5):54-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7050.2014.05.016

    ZHANG Peilan, ZHENG Li. Several industrial hydrogen production technology and economic analysis[J]. Shanxi Chemical Industry, 2014, 34(5): 54-56. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7050.2014.05.016
    [44]
    贺潇翔宇. 不同制氢工艺的成本对比[EB/OL]. (2022-10-20)[2023-01-14]. https://www.doc88.com/p-78147014158076.html.
    [45]
    郑励行,赵黛青,漆小玲,等. 基于全生命周期评价的中国制氢路线能效、碳排放及经济性研究[J]. 工程热物理学报,2022,43(9):2305-2317.

    ZHENG Lixing, ZHAO Daiqing, QI Xiaoling, et al. Research on energy efficiency, carbon emission and economy of hydrogen production routes in China based on life cycle assessment method[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2022, 43(9): 2305-2317. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [46]
    LI J, MA X, LIU H, et al. Life cycle assessment and economic analysis of methanol production from coke oven gas compared with coal and natural gas routes[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 185: 299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.100
    [47]
    AHMED U. Techno-economic analysis of dual methanol and hydrogen production using energy mix systems with CO2 capture[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 228: 113663. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113663
    [48]
    欧珊珊,江岳文. 氢能证书交易体系及其对制氢优化的影响[J]. 广东电力,2023,36(10):30-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-290X.2023.10.004

    OU Shanshan, JIANG Yuewen. Hydrogen certificate trade system and its influence on hydrogen production optimization[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2023, 36(10): 30-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-290X.2023.10.004
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Jikai, ZHENG Xia, XIAO Hongwei, SHAN Chunhui, LI Yican, YANG Taoqing. Simulation of heat and mass transfer shrinkage and quality of yam slices dried using infrared combined hot air[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2024, 40(6): 134-145. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202308074
    [2]Jiang Dalong, Wang Wenjie, Wang Shanyu, Lei Dengwen, Liu Yanhong, Xiao Hongwei, Wu Min, Gao Zhenjiang, Zheng Zhian. Coupled modeling and heat and mass transfer analysis of white radish slices dried by infrared radiation combined hot air drying[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(1): 314-323. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.01.035
    [3]Ju Haoyu, Zhao Haiyan, Zhang Weipeng, Gao Zhenjiang, Xiao Hongwei. Effects of relative humidity on heat and mass transfer characteristics of carrot during hot air drying[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2021, 37(5): 295-302. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.05.034
    [4]Zhang Jianping, Zhao Zhouneng. Heat and mass transfer characteristics and model of rapeseed fluidized-bed drying with constant drying rate[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2017, 33(13): 287-295. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.13.038
    [5]Zhao Fang, Cheng Daolai, Chen Zhenqian. Effect of ultrasonic treatment on hot air drying process of sludge[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2015, 31(4): 272-276. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.04.038
    [6]Liu Bin, Yuan Rubing, Zhang Qiang, Tong Mingwei. Experimental investigation on heat and mass transfer of fluidized drying of zymotic orange peel[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2011, 27(7): 353-357.
    [7]Li Biansheng, Liu Weitao, Li Dandan, Shen Xiaoxi, Yu Yuming, Ruan Zheng, Zhu Zhiwei. Characteristic of hot air drying of candied prunes and representation model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2009, 25(11): 330-335.
    [8]Zeng Lingbin, Zhao Siming, Xiong Shanbai, Guo Xiansong. Modeling and moisture diffusion properties of salted silver carp during hot-air drying[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2008, 24(7): 280-283.
    [9]Zhang Jianjun, Wang Haixia, Ma Yongchang, Zheng yan. Experimental research on hot-air drying properties of capsicum[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2008, 24(3).
    [10]Han Yuefeng, Peng Guanghua, Zhang Shenghua, Ma Rongchi. Effects of hot-air drying technology on the yield of organic sulfide in garlic slice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2007, 23(10): 271-274.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(17)

    1. 李丽. 基于激光SLAM的复杂场景智能机器人位置自标定研究. 激光杂志. 2025(01): 228-233 .
    2. 张兵,朱琳,刘天宇,夏锡城,乔志超,杨淮源. 基于自适应抗扰算法的温室农业机器人设计应用. 科技与创新. 2025(05): 59-62 .
    3. 边艳华,解路,苗超. 基于深度强化学习和大邻域搜索的矿山巡检机器人路径规划算法. 金属矿山. 2024(02): 212-218 .
    4. 高金喆,寇志伟,孔哲,景高乐,马佳音,许寒琪. 基于激光雷达的牧场巡检机器人定位与建图算法设计. 中国农机化学报. 2024(04): 222-230 .
    5. 汪沛,曾思晓,何杰. 无人驾驶农机避障路径跟踪仿真与验证. 华南农业大学学报. 2024(03): 416-426 .
    6. 窦汉杰,陈震宇,翟长远,邹伟,宋健,冯凡,张焱龙,王秀. 果园智能化作业装备自主导航技术研究进展. 农业机械学报. 2024(04): 1-22 .
    7. 李培艺,汪小旵,王延鑫,武尧,李泽晟. 基于LiDAR多维点云优化的垄作菊花采摘机器人自主导航方法研究. 南京农业大学学报. 2024(04): 809-822 .
    8. 马坚洪,陈学永,江仁伟,林鹏,李跃丹. 智能割草机自主导航关键技术的研究综述. 机电工程技术. 2024(07): 41-45 .
    9. 肖夫克,时国龙,董大明,程亮,尹柏强. 基于无源超高频RFID的农产品包装智能定位方法. 农业工程学报. 2024(14): 221-231 . 本站查看
    10. 李伟平,梁雪梅,程志强,许永华,贾鹏,王立军. 不同光质激光对人参生长的影响. 智能化农业装备学报(中英文). 2024(03): 44-50 .
    11. 王家博,魏文波,王广阔,高菊玲,肖茂华,鲁植雄,王光明. 履带式电动微耕机自动导航系统设计与试验. 农业工程学报. 2024(23): 63-72 . 本站查看
    12. 袁世一,李干琼,王恩利. 人工智能技术在种植业应用场景分析与挑战. 中国农业信息. 2023(02): 23-35 .
    13. 沈跃,肖鑫桦,刘慧,张璇. 果园机器人LiDAR/IMU紧耦合实时定位与建图方法. 农业机械学报. 2023(11): 20-28+48 .
    14. 杨玉林,赵家松,杨争钢,潘钰. 基于Arduino的文件自动装订装置设计. 现代电子技术. 2023(24): 183-186 .
    15. 王昊祥,冯艳,潘睿智,张洪溥,周依霖,熊根良,张华. 光纤光栅波电转换的人机仿生跟随. 光学精密工程. 2023(23): 3414-3425 .
    16. 孙月平,孙杰,袁必康,方正,秦云,赵德安. 基于改进YOLOv5s的轻量化蟹塘障碍物检测与定位方法. 农业工程学报. 2023(23): 152-163 . 本站查看
    17. 于楚飞,苏工兵,袁梦,曾文豪. SLAM技术在农业机器人中的应用进展. 数字农业与智能农机. 2023(06): 22-24 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (67) PDF downloads (18) Cited by(21)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return