• EI
    • CSA
    • CABI
    • 卓越期刊
    • CA
    • Scopus
    • CSCD
    • 核心期刊
Liu Zhao, Yang Wenyuan, Zha Yuanyuan, Yang Jinzhong. Multiple inverse models for estimating soil hydraulic parameters based on field-scale moisture content observation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2015, 31(6): 135-144. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.06.019
Citation: Liu Zhao, Yang Wenyuan, Zha Yuanyuan, Yang Jinzhong. Multiple inverse models for estimating soil hydraulic parameters based on field-scale moisture content observation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2015, 31(6): 135-144. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.06.019

Multiple inverse models for estimating soil hydraulic parameters based on field-scale moisture content observation

More Information
  • Received Date: January 13, 2015
  • Revised Date: March 11, 2015
  • Published Date: March 14, 2015
  • Abstract: Unsaturated zone hydrological processes played an important role between the processes of surface and groundwater hydrology. The Richards' equation was widely utilized to describe unsaturated zone flow due to its solid physical foundation. It was essential to know the parameters of this equation before simulation, and these parameters were also called as soil hydraulic parameters in this paper. Comparing with experimental methods, the inverse method was a more realistic way to obtain parameters. Universal Inverse Code (UCODE) using gradient-type minimization method provided users with flexibility in estimating parameters of forward models. However, there were many numerical methods to solve Richards' equation, and four representative numerical models discussed in this paper were Ross model, Picard-θ model, Picard-mix model and Picard-h model, respectively. It had been known that the Ross model was of the most computational efficiency, while Picard-h model may lead to serious mass balance problem. Based on the combination of UCODE and four numerical models of Richards' equation, four different inverse models of unsaturated flow were constructed in this paper to optimize three parameters of Richards' equation, i.e., Ks (Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity), α (Reciprocal of Air Entry Pressure) and n (Grain Size Distribution Parameter). In this paper, a ten days infiltration test was conducted in a 7.77 m ×29.38 m area located in Wuhan University Water Conservancy and Water Environmental Laboratory (China), and observed data was the soil water content measured by TRIME-PICO IPH system. Every 24 hours was as an irrigation-measurement period. The upper boundary flux Ra[L/T] changed with time. More specifically, Ra was 80 mm/d during the first 3 hours, while it was 0 mm/d in the last 21 hours. Before the infiltration test, Ks was measured directly by 29 double rings, and the others parameters were measured by centrifugal method (4 filled samples and 36 undisturbed samples). The parameters Ks and α significantly varied in space, while the variance of soil water content decreased with time due to uniform upper boundary in space. The measured soil hydraulic parameters were used as initial value, and then Ks, α and n were respectively estimated by the four inverse models based on the soil water content observed in the field scale. Several indexes, i.e. R2 (Coefficient of Determination), RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error), BIAS, IA (Index of Agreement), were used to evaluate the precision that the simulated model results matched the observed variables. By comparison of these indexes, the precision order of the four inverse models and measured parameters from high to low was as follows: Ross inverse model (RMSE: 0.0123), Picard-θ inverse model (RMSE: 0.0124), Picard-mix inverse model (RMSE: 0.0125), Picard-h inverse model (RMSE: 0.0128) and measured parameters (RMSE: 0.0138). The reason for the minimal differences of soil water content data simulated by the four models was that water retention curves (or unsaturated hydraulic conductivity curves) described by the four groups of optimized parameters were close to each other. Besides, the precision of the four inverse models were marginally improved with smaller grid size. In addition, the parameter equal finality was discussed in this paper. A group of parameters, by which RMSE is less than 0.0128 in this paper, can be called equivalent parameters. It can be noticed that the curves intersected in the soil water moisture interval where there were more observation values. The equal finality zone was defined as the envelopes of water retention curves or unsaturated hydraulic conductivity curves described by equivalent parameters. We discussed equal finality zones at three cases (RMSE≤0.128, RMSE≤0.128, RMSE≤0.125 and RMSE≤0.124) and pointed out that the width of equal finality zone became narrower with the demand of higher precision. The equal finality zone was also used to illustrate the fact that the precision of the filled samples were much higher than that of undisturbed samples.
  • [1]
    Brooks R H, Corey A T. Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media[J]. Hydrology Papers, Colorado State University, 1964, March
    [2]
    Gardner W R. Some Steady-State Solutions of the Unsaturated Moisture Flow Equation With Application to Evaporation From A Water Table[J]. Soil Science, 1958, 85(4): 228-232.
    [3]
    Russo D. Determining soil hydraulic properties by parameter estimation: On the selection of a model for the hydraulic properties[J]. Water Resources Research, 1988, 24(3): 453-459.
    [4]
    Van Genuchten M. T. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44(5): 892-898.
    [5]
    查元源,周发超,杨金忠. 一种由土壤剖面含水率估算土壤水力参数的方法 [J]. 水利学报,2011,(8):883-891.Zha Yuanyuan, Zhou Fachao, Yang Jinzhong. An approach to estimate soil hydraulic parameters using soil profile moisture data[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2011, (8): 883-891. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [6]
    ?im?nek J, Van Genuchten M T, ?ejna M. HYDRUS: model use, calibration, and validation[J]. Tansac Asabe, 2012, 55(4): 1261-1274.
    [7]
    Vogel T, Huang K. Hydrus Code for Simulating One-dimensional Water Flow, Solute Transport, and Heat Movement in Variably-saturated Media: Version 5.0[M]. US Department of Agriculture, 1996.
    [8]
    Poeter E P, Hill M C. Documentation of UCODE: A Computer Code for Universal Inverse Modeling[M]. DIANE Publishing, 1998.
    [9]
    夏强,万力,王旭升,等. UCODE反演程序的原理及应用 [J]. 地学前缘,2010,(6): 147-151.Xia Qiang, Wan Li, Wang Xusheng, et al. Principles and applications of the inverse problem program: UCODE[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2010, 17(6) : 147-151. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [10]
    Hydrogeologic W. Visual Modflow user's manual[J]. Waterloo Hydrogeologic, Waterloo, ON, 2005,
    [11]
    Whelan G, Castleton K J. Examining the Linkage Between FRAMES and GMS[M]. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2006.
    [12]
    Chiang W. Processing MODFLOW Version 8.0. 12-A simulation system for modeling groundwater flow and solute transport[J]. Webtech360, Irvine, Ca, USA, 2011,
    [13]
    任国澄,朱国荣,江思珉. UCODE在反求水文地质参数中的应用及其并行求解[J]. 勘察科学技术,2010,(3): 7-10.Ren Guocheng, Zhu Guorong, Jiang Simin. Application of UCODE to Calculation for Hydrogeological Parameters and Its Parallel Solving Process[J]. Site Investigation Science and Technology, 2010, (3): 7-10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [14]
    Dahiya R, Ingwersen J, Streck T. The effect of mulching and tillage on the water and temperature regimes of a loess soil: Experimental findings and modeling[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2007, 96(1/2): 52-63.
    [15]
    汪东林,栾茂田,杨庆. 重塑非饱和黏土的土-水特征曲线及其影响因素研究[J]. 岩土力学,2009,(3):751-756.Wang Donglin, Luan Maotian, Yang Qing. Experimental study of soil-water characteristic curve of remolded unsaturated clay[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, (3): 751-756. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [16]
    Celia M A, Ahuja L R, Pinder G F. Orthogonal collocation and alternating-direction procedures for unsaturated flow problems[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 1987, 10(4): 178-187.
    [17]
    Ross P J. Modeling soil water and solute transport - Fast, simplified numerical solutions[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2003, 95(6): 1352-1361.
    [18]
    查元源. 饱和-非饱和水流运动高效数值算法研究及应用 [D]. 武汉:武汉大学,2014.Zha Yuanyuan. Research on Cost-Effective Algorithm forUnsaturated-Saturated Flow and Its Application[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [19]
    Kool J, Van Genuchten M T. HYDRUS: One-dimensional Variably Saturated Flow and Transport Model, Including Hysteresis and Root Water Uptake, Version 3.31[M]. US Salinity Laboratory, 1991.
    [20]
    Zha Y, Yang J, Shi L, et al. Simulating One-Dimensional Unsaturated Flow in Heterogeneous Soils with Water Content-Based Richards Equation[J]. gsvadzone, 2013,12(2).
    [21]
    Zha Y, Shi L, Ye M, et al. A generalized Ross method for two- and three-dimensional variably saturated flow[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2013, 54(0): 67-77.
    [22]
    W. J. Rawls D. L. B., K. E. Saxton. Estimation of Soil Water Properties[J]. 1982, 25(5): 1316-1320.
    [23]
    王亚军. 相关系数与决定系数辨析[C]. 长江流域暨西北地区科技期刊协作网2008年学术年会论文集. 西安, 2008:74-77.
    [24]
    Leisenring M, Moradkhani H. Snow water equivalent prediction using Bayesian data assimilation methods[J]. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, 2011, 25(2): 253-270.
    [25]
    任启伟,陈洋波,周浩澜,等. 基于Sobol法的TOPMODEL模型全局敏感性分析[J]. 人民长江,2010,(19):91-94.Ren Qiwei, Chen Yangbo, Zhou Haolan, et al. Global sensitivity analysis of TOPMODEL parameters based on Sobol method[J]. Yangtze River, 2010, (19): 91-94. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [26]
    张利茹,管仪庆,王君,等. GLUE法分析水文模型参数不确定性的研究[J]. 水力发电,2010,(5):14-16.Zhang Liru, Guan Yiqing, Wang Jun, et al. Application and Study on analyzing uncertainty of xinanjiang model parameter Within the GLUE Method[J]. Water Power, 2010, (5): 14-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [27]
    张添,黄春林,沈焕锋. 土壤水分对土壤参数的敏感性及其参数优化方法研究 [J]. 地球科学进展,2012,(6):678-685.Zhang Tian, Huang Chunlin, Shen Huanfeng. Sensitivity and parameters optimization method of soil parameters to soil moisture in common land model[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2012, 27(6) : 678-685. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Catalog

    Article views (2271) PDF downloads (965) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return