• EI
    • CSA
    • CABI
    • 卓越期刊
    • CA
    • Scopus
    • CSCD
    • 核心期刊
Quality evaluation and parameter selection of maize by hot-air and vacuum drying[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2010, 26(3): 346-352.
Citation: Quality evaluation and parameter selection of maize by hot-air and vacuum drying[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2010, 26(3): 346-352.

Quality evaluation and parameter selection of maize by hot-air and vacuum drying

More Information
  • Received Date: February 13, 2009
  • Revised Date: October 13, 2009
  • Published Date: March 30, 2010
  • In order to reasonably evaluate the quality of maize after hot air and vacuum drying, the physical, physiological and biochemical quality parameters of maize dried by hot air and vacuum drying methods in different levels of drying strength were determined and analyzed. The quality evaluation parameters of dried maize were selected by using of the principle component analysis method. The results indicated that, to hot air drying, crack ratio was less than 35% when drying temperature was below 60℃, drying rate was lower than 4.21%/h. Drying temperature of maize seed should under 45℃. When drying temperature was above 75℃, drying rate was higher than 4.56%/h, crack ratio increased rapidly, content of MDA and fatty acid value increased, but the activity of POD decreased. The higher the initial moisture of maize had, the larger drying strength influenced on quality parameters. To vacuum drying, crack ratio was less than 35% when drying temperature below 75℃, drying rate lower than 5.56%/h, and the germination rate of maize had a less change under 45℃. When drying temperature was above 75℃, drying rate was higher than 5.56%/h, the activity of POD decreased, MDA, conductivity and fatty acid value increased, but the activity of POD decreased. By using of the principle component analysis method, the sensitive quality evaluation parameters of maize by hot air drying that were crack ratio, fatty acid value, the activity of POD, content of MDA and conductivity, while by vacuum drying were crack ratio, germination rate, activity of POD and conductivity. The comprehensive evaluation mode was erected, and it could fundamentally reflect maize drying quality.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WENG Haiyong, YAO Yue, HUANG Deyao, ZHANG Yuting, CHENG Zuxin, YE Dapeng, WU Renye. Rapid evaluation of rice neck blast resistance using low altitude remote sensing of UAV combined with YOLOv7[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2024, 40(21): 110-118. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202405029
    [2]Wu Delun, Rao Yuan, Xu Lei, Shu Yali, Ling Nuojuan, Shi Yulong. Design and implementation of the trusted evaluation and differentiated sharing model for agricultural blockchain information[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(11): 309-317. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.11.034
    [3]Zhu Bingying, Dong Jia, Shen Mingxing, Zheng Jianchu. Evaluation of production efficiency and sustainability for straw-sheep-cropland recycling agroecosystems based on emergy analysis[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(6): 235-243. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.06.029
    [4]Wang Chuanjian, Jiang Honghong, Yin Xiaojun, Sun Shize, Zhang Ya, Li Dong. Evaluation for natural grassland utilization intensity based on GPS and UAV remote sensing for grassland biomass inversion[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2018, 34(19): 82-87. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.19.011
    [5]Zhao Zhengqiang, Wu Jie, Wang Zhipeng, Ge Yun, Wang Huting. Vibration modal analysis of Korla pear and establishment of stiffness evaluation index[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2015, 31(23): 277-284. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.23.037
    [6]He Yongkun, Tang Yuxue, Zhang Jianping. Evaluation method for effects of drought disaster on yields of maize in Southwest China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2014, 30(23): 185-191. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.23.023
    [7]Feng Yingbin, He Chunyan, Yang Qingyuan, He Jian. Evaluation of ecological effect in land use planning using ecosystem service value method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2014, 30(9): 201-211. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.09.025
    [8]Wang Zhaopeng, Wu Jie, Mei Weijiang, Ge Yun. Finite element analysis of vibration mode and firmness evaluation for Korla pear[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2013, 29(25): 251-256.
    [9]Farmland grading based on land evaluation and site assessment method in Jingyang County, Shaanxi Provence[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2010, 26(5): 324-328.
    [10]Chen Li, Zhu Weidong. Application of rough neural network in agricultural engineering project evaluation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2006, 22(7): 230-232.

Catalog

    Article views (1472) PDF downloads (1168) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return