Construction and empirical analysis of the evaluation index system for the water-saving level of large-sized irrigation districts

Fan Xichao; Qin Jingtao; Xu Lei; Liu Siruo; Gu Shaowei; Lyu Mouchao

doi:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.20.011

Volume 37 Issue 20

Oct. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE) > 2021 > 37(20): 99-107. > DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.20.011

Fan Xichao, Qin Jingtao, Xu Lei, Liu Siruo, Gu Shaowei, Lyu Mouchao. Construction and empirical analysis of the evaluation index system for the water-saving level of large-sized irrigation districts[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2021, 37(20): 99-107. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.20.011

Citation:

PDF (600 KB)

Construction and empirical analysis of the evaluation index system for the water-saving level of large-sized irrigation districts

1.
Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453002, China
2.
Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
3.
China Irrigation and Drainage Development Center, Beijing 100054,China
4.
Key Laboratory of Watersaving Irrigation Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xinxiang 453002, China

More Information

Received Date: January 17, 2021
Revised Date: March 11, 2021
Published Date: October 14, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract: About 215 billion cubic metres of water has been consumed by large and medium-sized irrigation districts in recent years, particularly over 35% quantity of the total water consumption in China. The irrigation district has been the main field of agricultural water-saving construction. Therefore, it is necessary to accurately assess the water-saving level in modern irrigation districts. In this study, an index system was established to evaluate the water-saving level in large-scale irrigation districts. Five aspects were considered, including engineering water-saving, farmland water-saving, water use management, water resources protection, and water use benefit. Eight standards were selected, such as measurability, vulnerability, predictability, typicality, controllability, integrity, responsiveness, and stability. A screening model was constructed to identify the indexes to be shortlisted or not. Subsequently, 23 indexes from the 70 primary indexes, 86.42% of the information was expressed by 32.86% of the elementary indexes, indicating the concise and adequate index system. The final indexes were formed, including the backbone canal lining ratio, the completion rate of engineering projects, backbone canal intact rate, backbone hydraulic structures intact percentage, water utilization coefficient of canal system, high-efficient water-saving irrigation coverage percentage, field water utilization coefficient, multi-cropping index, gross irrigation water consumption per mu, real collection rate of water charges, water user association coverage rate, allocation rate of water measuring equipment on lateral gate, 2 fees implementation rate, number of management personnel per 10 000 mu, proportion of management personnel with junior college degree or above, informationization coverage rate, proportion of irrigation water in total water consumption, drainage ditch intact rate, water ecological monitoring system coverage rate, proportion of ecological water in the total water consumption, grain yield produced by 1m3 irrigation water, proportion of primary industry production in irrigation district, and water consumption per-10 000-yuan-GDP. Four large-scale irrigation districts (Qucun, Penglou, Guangli, and Dagong) are all located along the Yellow River in Henan Province. The indexe system was then investigated empirically to determine the water-saving level. The water-saving level indexes for the four objective Irrigation Districts were 0.666 (Qucun), 0.730 (Penglou), 0.657 (Guangli), and 0.616 (Dagong), respectively. On the whole, the score of the water-saving level index was ranked in the descending order of Penglou, Qucun, Guangli, and Dagong. The scores of the 5 secondary indexes showed that Penglou achieved the best effect of engineering water-saving, whereas, Dagong was a negative example. This was due to the well-matched infrastructure engineering, where the backbone canal system was of systematic construction and renovation in the past 10 years. Guangli performed relatively lower than the rest because the high-efficient coverage percentage of water-saving irrigation was rather weak and the gross consumption of irrigation water per mu was pretty high, particularly for the long-term goals of farmland water-saving. There was no significant difference in the score of water use management level among the four irrigation districts, but their agriculture water rate, water user association promotion, and water measuring facilities setting, all needed to be rather improved. Water resources protection was the common weakness of the four irrigation districts, indicating the concept of project construction without considering ecological protection over the past years. Consequently, five recommendations can be addressed to further improve the water-saving level in the irrigation districts. 1) To coordinate the backbone and field construction, 2) To establish the new water-saving system under the agricultural water price reform, 3) To strengthen the dredging and transformation of drainage ditches, 4) To improve the water resources and environment monitoring network, 5) To promote the efficient saving on water irrigation, particularly for the planting area of cash crops. The findings can provide an effective way to scientifically evaluate the water-saving construction in large-scale irrigation districts, thereby promoting the process of agricultural water-saving in China.
- irrigation,
- water resources,
- canals,
- large-sized irrigation district,
- water-saving level,
- index system,
- index optimization

FullText(HTML)

References (43)

References

[1]	中华人民共和国水利部. 2019 年中国水资源公报[EB/OL]. [2020-10-10].http://www. mwr. gov. cn/sj/tjgb/szygb/202008/t20200803_ 1430726. html
[2]	倪文进. 大中型灌区现代化建设需处理好几个问题[J]. 中国水利，2020(9)：6-7.Ni Wenjin. Several problems to be solved in the modernization of large and medium-sized irrigation distircts[J]. China Water Rssources, 2020(9): 6-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	易小燕，吴勇，尹昌斌，等. 以色列水土资源高效利用经验对我国农业绿色发展的启示[J]. 中国农业资源与区划，2018，39(10)：37-42.Yi Xiaoyan, Wu Yong, Yin Changbin, et al. The enlightenment of israel's efficient utilization of land and water resources to the green development of agriculture in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018, 39(10):37-42. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	宗会来. 以色列发展现代农业的经验[J]. 世界农业，2016(11)：136-143.
[5]	王岚，马改菊. 以色列现代农业发展的影响因素、特征及启示[J]. 世界农业，2017(1)：173-178.
[6]	张永升，谷彬，马九杰. 以色列现代农业之路[J]. 世界农业，2014(6)：64-67.
[7]	王秀鹃. 农业节水的路径组合与绩效研究[D]. 泰安：山东农业大学，2019.Wang Xiujuan. Study on the Route Combination and Performance of Agricultural Water-saving in China[D]. Tai'an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	张也. 我国农业节水管理的制度转型：以美国和德国为鉴[J]. 农村经济与科技，2018，29(7)：34-37.
[9]	冯颖. 农业节水技术补偿机制研究[D]. 杨凌：西北农林科技大学，2013.Feng Ying. Study on agricultural water-saving technology compensation mechanism[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	胡乐鸣，刘绍太，曹新惠，等. 美国机械化节水技术见闻与启示[J]. 农业技术与装备，2014(1)：39-42.
[11]	Shahat Sabet Mohamed Ahmed Ali. 埃及农业发展的评价与前景研究[D]. 北京：中国农业科学院，2017.Shahat Sabet Mohamed Ahmed Ali. Evaluation and Growth Prospect of Agricultural Development in Egypt[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	Aki Kubota. Study in effects of water-saving agriculture and intercropping system for increasing food production and the technology development in the Nile Delta, Egypt[J]. Research for Tropical Agriculture, 2018,11(1):32-34.
[13]	Fleifle A E, Saavedra Valeriano O C, Nagy H M, et al. Simulation-optimization model for intermediate reuse of agriculture drainage water in Egypt[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 139(3):391-401.
[14]	韩清瑞，高祥照. 以色列、土耳其节水农业发展状况与启示[J]. 中国农业信息，2014(4)：11-13.
[15]	许燕，施国庆. 土耳其的灌溉发展及其管理[J]. 节水灌溉，2009(11)：56-59.
[16]	李随祥. 由土耳其灌溉农业管理模式引发的思考[J]. 科技情报开发与经济，2004(9)：88-89.Li Suixiang. Thoughts on the management mode of irrigation agriculture in Turkey[J]. Sci-Tech Information Development & Economy, 2004(9):88-89. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	高占义. 我国灌区建设及管理技术发展成就与展望[J]. 水利学报，2019，50(1)：88-96.Gao Zhanyi. Technical achievement and prospection in irrigation scheme developmentand management in China. [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2019, 50(1): 88-96. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	韩振中，闫冠宇，刘云波，等. 大型灌区续建配套与节水改造评价指标体系的研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电，2002(7)：17-21.Han Zhenzhong, Yan Guanyu, Liu Yunbo, et al. Research on the evaluation index system for rehabilitation and water saving reform of large-sized irrigation district[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2002(7):17-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	倪文进. 以灌区节水改造促进灌区管理体制改革[J]. 中国水利，2009(11)：15-16.
[20]	阳眉剑，吴深，于赢东，等. 农业节水灌溉评价研究历程及展望[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报，2016，14(3)：210-218.Yang Meijian, Wu Shen, Yu Yingdong, et al. Progress and prospect of agricultural water-saving irrigation assessment[J]. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2016, 14(3):210-218. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	仵峰，王亮，宰松梅，等. 大型灌区农业水价综合改革的探索[J]. 河南水利与南水北调，2019，48(2)：27-28.
[22]	邢相军，王金霞，张丽娟. 黄河流域灌区的灌溉管理改革进展及影响因素研究[J]. 安徽农业科学，2010，38(25)：14098-14102.Xing Xiangjun, Wang Jinxia, Zhang Lijuan. The progress and determinants of irrigation management reform in the irrigation districts of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(25):14098-14102. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	齐学斌，黄仲冬，乔冬梅，等. 灌区水资源合理配置研究进展[J]. 水科学进展，2015，26(2)：287-295.Qi Xuebin, Huang Zhongdong, Qiao Dongmei, et al. Research advances on thereasonable water resources allocation in irrigation district[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2015, 26(2):287-295. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	彭世彰，纪仁婧，杨士红，等. 节水型生态灌区建设与展望[J]. 水利水电科技进展，2014，34(1)：1-7.Peng Shizhang, Ji Renjing, Yang Shihong, et al. Construction and prospect of water-saving ecological irrigation district[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2014, 34(1):1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	曹金萍. 节水目标下的农业水价改革研究[D]. 泰安：山东农业大学，2014.Cao Jinping. Reform of Irrigation Water Price in Water-saving Perspective: Take the Main Irrigation Area of Shandong Province as an Example[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	Sun H, Wang S, Hao X. An Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process Method for the evaluation of agricultural water management in irrigation districts of north China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2016,179(1):324-337.
[27]	曹永梅，李君，李廉俊. 基于属性层次模型的灌区节水水平研究[J]. 人民黄河，2017，39(9)：145-148.Cao Yongmei, Li Jun, Li Lianjun. Study on water-saving level of irrigation area based on Analytic Hierarchical Model[J]. Yellow River, 2017, 39(9):145-148. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	冯峰，倪广恒，孟玉清. 基于流向跟踪和多重赋权的引黄灌区用水效率评价[J]. 农业工程学报，2017，33(10)：145-153.Feng Feng, Ni Guangheng, Meng Yuqing. Evaluation of water use efficiency in Yellow River Irrigation Area based on flow-tracing and layered-weight method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2017, 33(10):145-153. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	王锦辉，费良军，谢芳，等. 灰色关联理论-TOPSIS法的大型灌区运行状况综合评价[J]. 排灌机械工程学报，2015，33(11)：985-990.Wang Jinhui, Fei Liangjun, Xie Fang, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of operational status of large-scale irrigation district based on grey relation theory and TOPSIS method[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2015, 33(11):985-990. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	乐志华，邵东国，李浩鑫，等. 漳河灌区节水改造综合效益评价[J]. 中国农村水利水电，2016(7)：11-14.Le Zhihua, Shao Dongguo, Li Haoxin, et al. The comprehensive benefit evaluation of water-saving reform of Zhanghe Irrigation District[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2016(7):11-14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	籍欢欢，胡振华，雷波，等. 基于多目标评价及Topsis方法的节水农业综合效益评价：以黑龙江和平灌区为例[J]. 节水灌溉，2019(4)：41-45.Ji Huanhuan, Hu Zhenhua, Lei Bo, et al. Comprehensive benefit evaluation of water saving agriculture based on Multi-objective Evaluation and Topsis method: Taking Heilongjiang Peace Irrigation District as an example[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2019(4):41-45. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	尚林鑫，李育飞，邵光成，等. 基于PSR模型的灌区节水改造综合效益物元分析评价[J]. 灌溉排水学报，2018，37(11)：121-128.Shang Linxin, Li Yufei, Shao Guangcheng, et al. Evaluating multiple benefits of revamping water-saving irrigation district based on the PSR Model[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2018, 37(11):121-128. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	朱洁，刘学军，陆立国. 宁夏节水型灌区考核评价标准研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电，2019(1)：13-15，21.Zhu Jie, Liu Xuejun, Lu Liguo. Research on evaluation standard of water-saving irrigation district in Ningxia[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2019(1): 13-15, 21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	雷薇，张超，王永涛，等. 贵州大型灌区续建配套与节水改造综合效益指标体系构建研究[J]. 节水灌溉，2016(2)：88-91，100.Lei Wei, Zhang Chao, Wang Yongtao, et al. Establishment of comprehensive benefit evaluation system of engineering corollary and water-saving reconstruction of large irrigation districts in Guizhou[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2016(2):88-91,100. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	中国灌溉排水发展中心，水利部水利水电规划设计总院. 大型灌区续建配套与现代化改造实施方案编制技术指南[EB/OL]. 2020-03-24 (2020-10-10). http://nssd.mwr. gov.cn/tzgg/202003/t20200324_1393429.html
[36]	Lin T, Lin J Y, Cui S H, et al. Using a network framework to quantitatively select ecological indicators[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2009, 9(6):1114-1120.
[37]	李琳，张领先，李道亮，等. 温室智能控制系统适用性评价指标体系选择模型[J]. 农业工程学报，2012，28(3)：148-153.Li Lin, Zhang Lingxian, Li Daoliang, et al. Indicators selecting model for applicability evaluation of greenhouse intelligent control system[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2012, 28(3):148-153. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	袁晓庆，孔箐锌，李奇峰，等. 水产养殖物联网的应用评价方法[J]. 农业工程学报，2015，31(4)：258-265.Yuan Xiaoqing, Kong Qingxin, Li Qifeng, et al. Evaluation method for application of internet of things for aquaculture[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2015, 31(4):258-265. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	涂武斌. 我国农村区域生态系统健康评价研究［D］. 北京：中国农业大学，2011.Tu Wubin. Study on the Ecosystem Health Assessment of China's Regional Rural Areas[D]. Beijing:China Agriculture University, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40]	Leccese F, Salvadori G, Rocca M, et al. A method to assess lighting quality in educational rooms using analytic hierarchy process[J]. Building and Environment, 2019, 168:106501.
[41]	Deveci M, Zcan E, John R, et al. A study on offshore wind farm siting criteria using a novel interval-valued fuzzy-rough based Delphi method[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 270:110916.
[42]	沈剑波，王应宽，朱明，等. 乡村振兴水平评价指标体系构建及实证[J]. 农业工程学报，2020，36(3)：236-243.Shen Jianbo, Wang Yingkuan, Zhu Ming, et al. Evaluation index system and empirical analysis of rural revitalization level[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(3):236-243. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43]	Li T, Zhang H, Yuan C, et al. A PCA-based method for construction of composite sustainability indicators[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17(5): 593-603.

[1]	Ding Jingtao, Zhang Yuhua, Cheng Hongsheng, Shen Yujun, Song Liqiu. Establishment of environmental impact assessment index system on agricultural planning[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2017, 33(7): 177-182. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.07.023
[2]	Qiu Yuanfeng, Meng Ge, Lei Shenglong. Evaluation index system for rural water conservancy modernization in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(20): 171-178. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.20.022
[3]	Yang Liu, Wang Ni, Xie Jiancang, Jing Xiaolong. Index optimization of eco-environment evaluation in irrigation district based on multi-source information fusion decision[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2015, 31(14): 225-231. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.14.031
[4]	Yao Chengsheng, Teng Yi, Huang Lin. Evaluation index system construction and empirical analysis on food security in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2015, 31(4): 1-10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.04.001
[5]	Qian Jianping, Liu Xuexin, Yang Xinting, Xing Bin, Ji Zengtao. Construction of index system for traceability granularity evaluation of traceability system[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2014, 30(1): 98-104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.01.013
[6]	Zhao Liqin, Guo Yuming, Zhang Peizeng, Han Zhanxing. Construction and gray evaluation of the performance index system of wheat no-tillage planter[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2009, 25(5): 89-93.
[7]	Chen Yu, Yang Gaihe, Feng Yongzhong, Ren Guangxin. Index system for regional suitability evaluation of trinity biogas ecosystem[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2009, 25(3): 174-178.
[8]	Yuan Xiujie, Zhao Gengxing, Zhu Xuexin. Linkage of evaluation index system for cultivated land fertility evaluation in plain and hill regions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2008, 24(7): 65-71.
[9]	Li Yan, Zhao Gengxing, Wang Ailing, Zhang Ren. Evaluation index system for land consolidation benefit and itsapplication[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2006, 22(10): 98-101.
[10]	Zhang Yong, Zeng Lan, Wu Bingfang. Index systems for regional food security early warning[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2004, 20(3): 192-196.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(21)

1.	张召召，雷金洋. 基于频域反射的环式农田土壤水分传感器的开发与试验验证. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文). 2024(02): 265-271 .
2.	马尤林. 黔西南州兴仁县贞龙中型灌区节水配套改造工程分析评估研究. 水利科技与经济. 2024(06): 100-104 .
3.	徐凯，沈建强，刘敏昊，杨开静，白明皓，雷波，徐立荣，翟林鹏. 基于C-D生产函数的灌区节水贡献率研究. 中国农村水利水电. 2024(07): 234-240+254 .
4.	粟洨悦，陈万林，徐志芬，陈菁，岳琼，马隰龙，李金刚. 都江堰灌区水-能源-粮食系统耦合协调分析. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 32-40 .
5.	申欣鑫，黎红梅. 续建配套与节水改造对粮食综合生产能力的影响研究——基于湖南省14个市州大型灌区的实证分析. 中国农业资源与区划. 2024(09): 42-53 .
6.	向宇轩，赵鑫，牛攀，艾武，崔宁博，陈飞. 智慧灌溉技术推广效应评价体系研究与实证. 节水灌溉. 2024(12): 72-79+94 .
7.	黄玮，余小罗，裴青宝，宋奕欣，韩雨. 灌区灌溉功能健康评价与分析——以江西省永丰县为例. 江西水利科技. 2024(06): 458-463 .
8.	赵文琦，孙栋元，周敏，惠磊，张发荣，徐宝山，崔艳强，马亚丽，盛彩红. 疏勒河流域现代化灌区建设评价研究. 水利规划与设计. 2023(02): 17-22 .
9.	张欣，张保祥，李冰，吴振. 基于用水定额的区域节水评价方法及应用. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文). 2023(01): 95-106 .
10.	王莹，谭美仙，陈正发，李重庆，李靖. 高原山地绿色农田健康水循环评价指标体系. 排灌机械工程学报. 2023(05): 511-518 .
11.	雪宝，汤骅，程泉，俞靖，刘洪光，张志远. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的灌溉用水效率评价. 灌溉排水学报. 2023(05): 82-89+107 .
12.	杨盛贇，王洁，彭亚敏，陈菁，陈丹. 灌区高质量发展判断准则与评价指标研究. 中国农村水利水电. 2023(06): 236-241+248 .
13.	余幸，王艳华，景明，罗玉丽，杨健，曹起章，吕望. 大中型灌区高质量发展现状评价指标体系构建与实证. 人民黄河. 2023(08): 21-25 .
14.	张立志，李小军，谢文鹏. 山东省灌区节水评价指标的筛选与应用分析. 山东水利. 2023(07): 25-27+30 .
15.	王腾，李佳，付尧，郑慧，赵永峰，李俊，樊才睿. 基于层次分析-熵权法的内蒙古农牧交错带农业用水水平综合评价. 水土保持学报. 2023(05): 259-266 .
16.	赵杰. 面向农田灌区水利泵站工程的决策优化研究. 水利科技与经济. 2023(10): 113-117 .
17.	李珊珊，曹顶业，沈桂莹，李国栋. 基于机器学习和全局敏感性的弧形闸门淹没特性. 农业工程学报. 2023(15): 25-33 . 本站查看
18.	朱洁，刘学军，蒋佳莉. 基于FAHP法的宁夏现代化生态灌区健康评价体系研究与实证. 节水灌溉. 2023(11): 121-129 .
19.	任盼，费良军，冯缠利，同海丽，姜瑞瑞，介飞龙，高旭艳，陈思远. 基于模糊层次分析法的节水型生态灌区综合评价. 灌溉排水学报. 2022(07): 129-139 .
20.	刘恬恬，李子明，胡雅琪，马蒙，吴文勇. 灌溉渠系优化配水模型与算法研究进展. 节水灌溉. 2022(11): 51-58 .
21.	聂超甲，叶回春，张世文，郭佳炜，崔贝，黄文江. 海南岛农业台风灾害风险评估与可持续发展对策. 农业工程学报. 2022(23): 237-246 . 本站查看